Religion & Public Life With Mark Silk

Religion & Public Life With Mark Silk

Tancredo’s Constitutional Revisionism

posted by Mark Silk | 7:29am Tuesday July 27, 2010

Tom Tancredo, the former  congressman from Colorado who briefly ran for
the 2008 Republican presidential nomination on an anti-immigrant
platform, has now thrown his hat into the Colorado senatorial gubernatorial ring, running
under the auspices
of the Constitution Party. That party, among
other things, indulges in what has become all-to-familiar historical revisionism regarding the
religious roots of the republic, to wit (from the preamble to its platform):

This great nation was founded, not by religionists,
but by
Christians; not on religions but on the Gospel of Jesus Christ. For this
very reason peoples of other faiths have been and are afforded asylum,
prosperity, and freedom of worship here.

The goal of the Constitution Party is to restore American
jurisprudence to its Biblical foundations and to limit the federal
government to its Constitutional boundaries.

Some of those founders were hardly Christians. Thomas Jefferson, for his part, was denounced by Federalist pamphleteers in the 1796 and 1800 presidential elections as a Francophiliac atheist. But never mind that. The key claim here is that the United States was founded on the Gospel, and that this is the reason those of other faiths were afforded religious liberty.

Let us stipulate that certain kinds of Protestant Christianity may have disposed some revolutionary-era Americans toward the principle of permitting all religious comers to worship according to their lights. That was not the kind that impelled the Calvinist powers-that-be in the Massachusetts Bay Colony to throw the likes of Roger Williams and Anne Hutchinson out of Boston. Or to kill the odd Quaker who had the misfortune of stumbling into their neck of the woods. But by the end of the 18th century, freedom of conscience was a widely accepted idea in the Anglo-American world.

For the framers of the Constitution, however, this was a non-Christian Enlightenment point of view. George
Washington’s 1790 letter
to the Jews of Newport could not be clearer that it was a secular principle of citizenship, not a Gospel gift of soul freedom that had been embraced in the Novus Ordo Seclorum: 

The citizens of
the United States of America have a right to applaud
themselves for having given to mankind examples of an enlarged and
liberal policy, a policy worthy of imitation. All possess alike liberty
of conscience and immunities of citizenship.

It is now no more that toleration is
spoken of as if it were the
indulgence of one class of people that another enjoyed the exercise of
their inherent natural rights, for, happily, the Government of the
United States, which gives to bigotry no sanction, to persecution no
assistance, requires only that they who live under its protection should
demean themselves as good citizens in giving it on all occasions their
effectual support.

The patronizing religiosity of the Constitution Party bears no relationship to the Constitution.



Previous Posts

The Ayn Rand Republicans
I confess to feeling a little bit queasy about the American Values Network's new video hoisting Rep. Paul Ryan, Sen. Rand Paul, Rush Limbaugh, and other GOP luminaries on the petard of Ayn Rand and her atheistic philosophy of objectivism. Take a look. [youtube]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0TxCW

posted 7:13:30pm May. 24, 2011 | read full post »

Whither evangelicals?
I'm fully prepared to believe that Mitch Daniels' family proved to be the unleapable hurdle in his abortive run-up to the GOP presidential race. Imagine yourself as wife Cheri, having split for the coast to marry on old flame, your husband and young daughters left behind in Boone County, Indiana,

posted 9:19:56am May. 23, 2011 | read full post »

No more "social conservatives"
With the presidential election cycle getting up to speed, it's time for reporters and yakkers like me to stop writing about "social conservatives" as if they were an identifiable segment of the voting population. I say this as someone who has happily been using the term since late 2008, when it

posted 8:25:11am May. 20, 2011 | read full post »

So clerical celibacy was not the problem?
Those on the Catholic left are not very happy that the Jay Report declines in no uncertain terms to blame clerical celibacy for the sexual abuse crisis. As the report puts it: Factors that remained consistent over this time period, such as celibacy, do not explain the sexual abuse "crisis." Celib

posted 9:50:34am May. 19, 2011 | read full post »

Gay priests are not the problem
That's the big news out of the John Jay College Final Report on the sexual abuse of minors by Catholic priests, due out at 2 p.m. today, according to David Gibson's scoop for RNS last night (followed swiftly by NYT's Laurie Goodstein, who also scored a copy). To wit: [T]he researchers found no st

posted 6:56:19am May. 18, 2011 | read full post »

Advertisement
Comments read comments(3)
post a comment
Dennis Keane

posted July 27, 2010 at 12:09 pm


Wonderful entry. When I first came across this page, I was under the initial impression that it would support the revisionist history of the USA as being founded on Christian “values”. I was very happy to be wrong.
Also, I did not know of the George Washington letter. This letter in combination with Jefferson’s writings and the treaty with Tripoli gives very strong evidence that the country formed a secular government to protect the rights of people like Tom Tancrendo to make foolish statements.
Thank you
Dennis Keane



report abuse
 

Your Name

posted July 27, 2010 at 12:37 pm


This man is scarier than Rod Dreher.



report abuse
 

kenneth

posted July 27, 2010 at 1:14 pm


I knew it had to happen sooner or later: a Christian Hamas.



report abuse
 

Post a Comment

By submitting these comments, I agree to the beliefnet.com terms of service, rules of conduct and privacy policy (the "agreements"). I understand and agree that any content I post is licensed to beliefnet.com and may be used by beliefnet.com in accordance with the agreements.

Share this story


About Beliefnet

Our mission is to help people like you find, and walk, a spiritual path that will bring comfort, hope, clarity, strength, and happiness. More about Beliefnet.

Help

Media Kit

Subscribe

Legal

Copyright © Beliefnet, Inc. and/or its licensors. All rights reserved. Use of this site is subject to Terms of Service and to our Privacy Policy. Constructed by Beliefnet.

Advertisement

Report as Inappropriate

You are reporting this content because it violates the Terms of Service.

All reported content is logged for investigation.