|
Previous Posts
We're Moving
Science & the Sacred is moving to our new home on The BioLogos Foundation's Web site. Be sure to visit and bookmark our new location to stay up to date with the latest blogs from Karl Giberson, Darrel Falk, Pete Enns, and our various guests in the science-religion dialogue. We're inaugurating ou
posted 8:00:00am Dec. 11, 2009 |
read full post
»
Shiny Scales, Silvery Skins, and Evolution
Source: Physorg.comIridescence -- a key component of certain makeup, paints, coatings of mirrors and lenses -- is also an important feature in the natural world. Both fish and spiders make use of periodic photonic systems, which scatter or reflect the light that passes against their scales or
posted 8:00:00am Dec. 09, 2009 |
read full post
»
A Stellar Advent Calendar
Looking for a unique way to mark the days of the Advent season? The Web site Boston.com offers an Advent calendar composed of images from the Hubble Telescope, both old and new. Each day, from now until the celebration of the Nativity of Christ, the calendar will offer a beautiful image from the hea
posted 8:00:00am Dec. 09, 2009 |
read full post
»
Belief, Guidance, and Evolution
Recently BioLogos' Karl Giberson was interviewed by Marcio Campos for the Brazilian newspaper Gazeta do Povo's Tubo De Ensaio (i.e. "Test tube") section. What follows is a translated transcript of that interview, which we will be posting in three installments. Here is the first.
Campos: Starting o
posted 8:00:00am Dec. 08, 2009 |
read full post
»
Let's Come at this From a Different Angle
Every Friday, "Science and the Sacred" features an essay
from a guest voice in the science and religion dialogue. This week's
guest entry was written by Peter Enns. Enns is an evangelical Christian
scholar and author of several books and commentaries, including the
popular Inspiration and Incarnatio
posted 8:00:00am Dec. 04, 2009 |
read full post
»
|
posted June 2, 2009 at 12:06 pm
The Holy Inquisition does not deserve any credit here. Obsequious groveling to the Medici family and his post-review additions regarding the movement of Jupiter’s moons to the manuscript are what got this thing through. The Inquisition, even then, was committed to allowing scientific conclusions to be made only if they were amenable to received dogma.
posted June 3, 2009 at 5:41 pm
I have to agree with DML. The Inquisition’s failure to persecute Galileo for publication of this paper is not evidence of any common ground between scientific inquiry and the religious authority of the time. I am a strong proponent of the harmony between science and faith, but I believe that science as a way of understanding the universe should be embraced by religion, not conditionally tolerated.
posted June 6, 2009 at 11:47 am
There was nothing holy about the "holy" inquisition!