Science and the Sacred

Decent Swordfish

Monday August 31, 2009

Categories: Weekly Feature
swordfish.jpg

Source: FotoosVanRobin / Flickr / All Rights Reserved

Every Monday, "Science and the Sacred" features an essay from one of The BioLogos Foundation's co-presidents: Karl Giberson and Darrel Falk. Today's entry was written by Karl Giberson.

I love the show Frasier and watch it most nights before I go to bed. Last night's episode had Frasier whining about how nothing was up to his standards at the resort where he was trying to score points with his latest love interest.

Frasier was particularly upset that the fancy fish entrees on the menu had run out. The waiter said that he was sorry but that they did have a "decent swordfish." Frasier responded with condescension, ridiculing this suggestion and making it sound like "decent swordfish" was fare suitable only for boorish philistines. He even managed to pronounce the proffered entrée in such a way that it sounded unappetizing.

Frasier's sneering condescension put me in mind of some of the complaints that have been leveled at the BioLogos project to find harmony between science and faith. I speak of the way that that the label "accommodationist" is being applied as if it were a warning from the FDA that these ideas are not fit for human consumption. On Richard Dawkins site there is a long discussion called "The Big Accommodationism Debate," with contributions from various critics who blog about accommodationism as if it is some kind of plague.

But accommodationism, like "decent swordfish," should not be sneered at. To accommodate is good. It's a virtue, like honesty, diligence, and kindness. Imagine a father going into a hotel on a rainy night hoping they have room for him and his tired family. He comes out and announces, "Thank goodness, but they are not accommodating. I would hate to have stopped at an accommodationist motel." Does this make sense? Does it make sense not to invite Aunt Clara for Thanksgiving because she is too accommodating?

To accommodate simply means to "provide what the occasion needs." Hotels accommodate guests when they have room for them; car dealers accommodate customers by providing them with appropriate cars. Polite hosts accommodate their dinner guests by not talking about how they came on the wrong day, or how their clothes are so out of fashion.

In a pluralistic democracy accommodationism is critically important for civil discourse. America has made great strides in accommodating the many viewpoints that have a place at our national table. We have particular words and phrases that we use and don't use to talk about African Americans, gays, women, the disabled, Jews, the elderly, and so on. The very atheists whining about the accommodationism of BioLogos are asking us to start calling them brights, because "atheist" sounds, you know, so negative...

The BioLogos project is proud to be labeled accommodationist, for that is exactly how we see ourselves. We believe that science and faith can and should accommodate each other. They are not the same, so they need not be equated or assimilated, but they do need to co-exist.

As scientists we understand that natural history does not testify to an endless series of supernatural interventions. We appreciate that our faith traditions have come to accommodate this fact about the world and adjusted accordingly. As religious believers we understand that the world is meaningful and we reject the claim that science has squeezed out all meaning from nature. Our science can accommodate the belief that the world is not without purpose, for science has no reason whatsoever to even be talking about purpose, much less claiming to have proved it is not there.

We plead with our colleagues in the scientific community to refrain from talking about science as if it is all encompassing and capable of adjudicating questions of purpose; and we plead with our fellow believers to refrain from using their theological beliefs to explain all of reality, as if the Bible was a science text. If we do this then perhaps those two perspectives can indeed accommodate each other.

And then, of course, we can all sit down together and enjoy a nice meal of decent swordfish.

Share |
Advertisement
Comments
Bob Smallman
August 31, 2009 1:52 PM

Nicely put!

Jonathan
August 31, 2009 7:03 PM

Wow! Godwin's Law in the 2nd comment!

Bob Smallman
September 1, 2009 10:52 AM

Just a clarification: I meant the ARTICLE was nicely put.

Daniel Mann
September 1, 2009 2:42 PM
http://www.MannWord.blogspot.com


Karl,

I appreciate the clarity with which you write, and I suspect that I would like you if we ever were to meet. But if eating swordfish together depends upon our accommodating to each other, I’m afraid I will have to forego the swordfish. I have something that’s too valuable to compromise.

As you have already so poignantly demonstrated, Darwin’s acid is highly corrosive to the Christian faith. This is a price that few Christians are understandably ready to pay. I’m afraid you will have to share your swordfish with your fellow Darwinists.

Scanman
September 7, 2009 12:48 AM

To Karl above,

I don't mind compromising to the truth. If my interpretation of scriptures is contradictory to the truths that are written by God in the text of his creationm, than it is my interpretation that has to be reexamined.

Read All Comments

Post a Comment

By submitting these comments, I agree to the beliefnet.com terms of service, rules of conduct and privacy policy (the "agreements"). I understand and agree that any content I post is licensed to beliefnet.com and may be used by beliefnet.com in accordance with the agreements.



Please type the text you see in the box below to verify your post and help us prevent spam. You have a limited time to type - you may wish to compose your comment in a separate document and paste it here upon completion.

Type the characters you see in the picture above.

Advertisement

Search This Blog

feed icon Subscribe

RSS Feed

Receive updates from Science and the Sacred

About the Authors

The BioLogos Foundation
The BioLogos Foundation promotes the search for truth in both the natural and spiritual realms, and seeks to harmonize these different perspectives.
» Posts by The BioLogos Foundation
Darrel Falk
Dr. Darrel Falk is Professor of Biology at Point Loma Nazarene University in San Diego, where he has taught since 1988. He is the author of Coming to Peace with Science: Bridging the Worlds Between Faith and Biology (InterVarsity Press, Downer's Grove, Il
» Posts by Darrel Falk
Karl Giberson
Dr. Karl Giberson is an internationally known scholar of science-and-religion and one of America’s leading participants in the creation/evolution controversy. He is the author of four books, including, “Saving Darwin".
» Posts by Karl Giberson
Pete Enns
Peter Enns is an evangelical Christian scholar, author of several books and commentaries, and Senior Fellow of Biblical Studies for BioLogos.
» Posts by Pete Enns
More »

About Science and the Sacred

Leaders of the BioLogos Foundation share insights on the latest ideas on science, faith, and their integration.

Advertisement

Advertisement


About Beliefnet

Our mission is to help people like you find, and walk, a spiritual path that will bring comfort, hope, clarity, strength, and happiness. More about Beliefnet.

Legal

Copyright © Beliefnet, Inc. and/or its licensors. All rights reserved. Use of this site is subject to Terms of Service and to our Privacy Policy. Constructed by Beliefnet.

Advertisement

Report as Inappropriate

You are reporting this content because it violates the Terms of Service.

All reported content is logged for investigation.