
Twenty-one years and 40,000 generations later, an experiment looking at the evolution of a population of single-celled E. coli bacteria has finally reached its conclusion. The results "beautifully emphasize the succession of mutational events that allowed these organisms to climb toward higher and higher efficiency in their environment," says Dominique Schneider, a molecular geneticist and member of the research team. More importantly, the study offers new insights (and also raises new questions) about the relationship between adaptive evolution, random mutations, and the genome.
The scientists began the experiment with a cultured population of fast-reproducing E. coli bacteria, freezing samples of the population at fixed points to compare their genomes to previous and future generations. While Darwin's theory of natural selection has been extensively tested and supported in various ways over the years, never before has it been studied for so many generations and in such enormous detail.
By the midpoint (20,000 generations), the team found 45 mutations in the surviving bacteria. Just as Darwin's theory proposed, these mutations did indeed confer some advantage to the bacteria. Thanks to advances in genome sequencing since the project began 21 years ago, the team was able to precisely see which mutations were beneficial and how they improved adaptation of the cells to their environment. Says Michigan State University professor and team member Richard Lenski, "It's extra nice now to be able to show precisely how selection has changed the genomes of these bacteria, step by step over tens of thousands of generations."
However, later generations of the experiment showed that the relation between mutations and adaptations is not always in a predictable equilibrium. A mutation which altered DNA metabolism around generation 26,000 led to a massive jump in mutations, even though the rate of adaptation was beginning to slow. By the final generation, the number of mutations increased to 653, and many of these were likely neutral and had no impact on the adaptability of the bacteria to their environment.
40,000 generations and 20 years seems like a long time to study the changes in a single type of cell. However, this represents 1/3,000,000,000th of the time and a much more miniscule fraction of the organisms which would have existed prior to the first multi-cellular organisms on earth. We know so little and yet we have learned so much.
The team plans to continue their study on the tiny bacteria, but the results, as collaborator Jeffrey Barrick notes, show "an astounding amount about the details of evolution in these little Erlenmeyer flasks."
The full paper can be accessed online through the journal Nature (with a paid subscription).

Add to Newsvine
Add to StumbleUpon




However, this represents 1/3,000,000,000th of the time and a much more miniscule fraction of the organisms which would have existed prior to the first multi-cellular organisms on earth.
Two surplus zeros.
What is wonderful about this experiment is that it demonstrates that evolution DOES take place without necessarily having those great transformations that are such a controversy among Christians and non-Christians.
Personally, I believe in evolution. That is not to say that I don't believe in creationism. The details simply don't matter. They just don't.
It's awesome to see scientists attemtping to show us how God does things. A lab environment in place of the creation event.
A glimpse maybe, but it's great validation for the "fundamentals of the faith."
By the way, did any of those e coli's change into a bullfrog tadpole?
I'm just asking.
You know, the chicken or the egg deal.
If E. Coli gave rise to amphibians after 40k generations, that would be proof of creation by miraculous intervention, not evolution by natural selection.
And, no, that didn't happen, so...
I'm just sayin'.
GJG
It is a characteristic of the E. coli used in this study that they cannot grow on citrate in the presence of oxygen. Yet, they found that they were able to evolve the ability. Just waiting for them to publish some results as to what the mutations were, in what order they may have occurred and how it changed the baacteriums physiology.
Post a Comment
By submitting these comments, I agree to the beliefnet.com terms of service, rules of conduct and privacy policy (the "agreements"). I understand and agree that any content I post is licensed to beliefnet.com and may be used by beliefnet.com in accordance with the agreements.