Steven Waldman

Steven Waldman

Romney Was TOO Christian

posted by swaldman | 4:29pm Thursday February 7, 2008

Some might think that Romney lost evangelicals because he wasn’t Christian enough. I think it’s the other way around. He acted too Christian.
Romney believed that to win the nomination he had to win over evangelical Christians. He figured the way to do that was to get all Jesusy. So he declared, “I believe that Jesus Christ is the Son of God and the Savior of mankind.” In so doing, he showed a fatal misunderstanding of the attitude of evangelicals toward Mormonism. Though some evangelicals do believe Mormonism is an evil cult, many simply believe it’s an odd religion. Strange, but no stranger than all sorts of other religions. These evangelicals are actually quite tolerant, and would be willing to vote for a non-evangelical candidate who shared their values in other ways. Remember how popular Joe Lieberman, an Orthodox Jew, was with evangelicals? Many Christians at the time simply said, well he’s not of our faith but he’s religious, the next best thing to being a religious Christian, and he’s got conservative values.
Romney could have engendered the same response. He could have stressed his religiosity, and the wholesomeness of Mormons (a “brand asset” for the faith). But when he instead went around demonstrating his Christian-ness, he crossed a line, making many evangelicals think he was misrepresenting Christianity. He went from being odd to being dangerous.”When he goes around and says Jesus Christ is my Lord and savior, he ticks off at least half the evangelicals,” Richard Land of the Southern Baptist Convention said. “He’s picking a fight he’s going to lose.”
Of course Romney was in a difficult position. Mormons do consider themselves Christian. So he was faced with the dilemma of alienating evangelicals and betraying his own faith.



Previous Posts

Good Bye
Today is my last day at Beliefnet (which I co-founded in 1999). The swirling emotions: sadness, relief, love, humility, pride, anxiety. But mostly deep, deep gratitude. How many people get to come up with an idea and have rich people invest money to make it a reality? How many people get to create

posted 8:37:24am Nov. 20, 2009 | read full post »

"Steven Waldman Named To Lead Commission Effort on Future of Media In a Changing Technological Landscape" (FCC Press Release)
STEVEN WALDMAN NAMED TO LEAD COMMISSION EFFORT ON FUTURE OF MEDIA IN A CHANGING TECHNOLOGICAL LANDSCAPE FCC chairman Julius Genachowski announced today the appointment of Steven Waldman, a highly respected internet entrepreneur and journalist, to lead an agency-wide initiative to assess the state o

posted 11:46:42am Oct. 29, 2009 | read full post »

My Big News
Dear Readers, This is the most difficult (and surreal) post I've had to write. I'm leaving Beliefnet, the company I co-founded in 1999. In mid November, I'll be stepping down as President and Editor in Chief to lead a project on the future of the media for the Federal Communications Commission, the

posted 1:10:11pm Oct. 28, 2009 | read full post »

"Beliefnet Co-Founder and Editor-in-Chief Steps Down to Lead FCC Future of the Media Initiative" (Beliefnet Press Release)
October 28, 2009 BELIEFNET CO-FOUNDER AND EDITOR-IN-CHIEF STEPS DOWN TO LEAD FCC FUTURE OF THE MEDIA INITIATIVE New York, NY - October 28, 2009 - Beliefnet, the leading online community for inspiration and faith, announced today that Steven Waldman, co-founder, president and editor-in-chief, will re

posted 1:05:43pm Oct. 28, 2009 | read full post »

Secularizing the Cross (Christian Activists: Be Careful What You Wish For)
The Supreme Court heard oral arguments this week, in Buono v. Salazar, about whether a white 6 1/2 foot cross can be displayed in a national park as a tribute to World War I soldiers. Though it's depicted as a classic clash of the secular and the religious, it actually illustrates why Christian act

posted 1:15:51pm Oct. 08, 2009 | read full post »

Advertisement
Comments read comments(19)
post a comment
Michele McGinty

posted February 7, 2008 at 7:48 pm


You’re right, he should have made the distinction because we all know it’s there but I still voted for him because what choice did I have?



report abuse
 

Nate Oman

posted February 7, 2008 at 9:14 pm


I think that you are right that Romney’s Jesus line in his Texas speech was a tactical mistake, but I also think that you are wrong as to why he made the statement. I think that he understood that the statement would not go down well with evangelical Christians. (I know people involved at the Romney campaign at a fairly high level who told me that Romney was told NOT to mention Jesus in the speech for precisely this reason.)
Rather, I think that Jesus was in the speech as a direct challenge to evangelical Christians and was part and parcel to his claim that he would not abandon his Mormonism in order to get the nod. Part of not abandoning his Mormonism was refusing to cede the Mormons-are-not-Christians argument. The flaw of your analysis is that you fail to understand that the Mormon insistence on their own Christianity is not simply a tactical PR ploy, but rather flows from religious covenants that Mormons regard as central.



report abuse
 

S Wells

posted February 8, 2008 at 8:55 am


Well, he was certainly too Christian for me. I’m an atheist. It’s extremely difficult for me to take seriously the suitability of anyone who believes Jesus was the Son of God for public office. From my perspective, it’s a lot like being confronted with someone who thinks they have a direct pipeline to reliable moral principles because the large white rabbit who follows them around tells them they do.
I know, I know, religious people don’t see it that way. I’m just saying how it looks to me. Not saying there’s not good stuff in the bible because there is. But, the good stuff that is in there is good because it’s true, not because it’s in the bible. There’s lots of junk in there too that we would be better off disregarding.
Anyone who believes there is an omnipotent, omniscient god is highly suspect as a potential leader from where I stand.



report abuse
 

Steven Hall

posted February 8, 2008 at 10:09 am


Nate Oman has it right. Romney was not the mistaken one in this relationship. This shows that evangelicals have a fundamental misunderstanding of how crucial–and central–a role Jesus Christ plays in the Mormon faith.



report abuse
 

Donny (Psalm 51, me too.)

posted February 8, 2008 at 10:47 am


Mormons consider themselves Christians. The Apostles of Christ Jesus, do not. The Gospels where Jesus was quoted, do not.
This is why Mormons have to hold to their: ” . . . as far as the Bible is translated correctly.” doctrine. Their Jesus is a different “person” than that of historic Christian truth. Their Jesus may be dear to them, but Jesus Himself warned we believers in Him, to expect the Mormon brand of counterfeit religion. And that is why we also reject the false version of Liberal and Progressive lies.
You are right, Evengelicals (which I am) would vote for a non-Evangelical Christian. Remember Ronald Reagan?
But when it comes to a heretical and thoroughly false religion attempting to pass itself off as part of the Christian body . . . WHEN IT HAS ATTACKED EVERY SINGLE DENOMINATION AS BEING EXPELLED FROM THE CHURCH from the lips of their faith-founding “Prophet” . . . they are going to have a problem when it comes to wanting to join those that they reject from the foundation of their new American religion.
Mormons (and Mr. Romney) should have just been honest from day one. They certainly are fine conservtive Republicans. No problems there. But please no pretense of a Christian connection.
Mormons were first called “Christians” by themselves while they lived in America. The followers of the historic Christ Jesus, were first called “Christians” in Antioch two-millenia before Joseph Smith was born. And sorry Mr. Smith and YOUR followers, but the gates of Hell have not prevailed against it. You are not the first group of people to get that wrong. You’ve heard of Liberals and Progressives obviously.



report abuse
 

James

posted February 8, 2008 at 10:53 am


Listen, Romney’s campaign failed because conservatives recognized that the man did not hold many of our beliefs as late as 1994. This “I saw the light” routine didn’t pass the smell test with us. There is something uneasy about someone saying anything to get elected.



report abuse
 

frgough

posted February 8, 2008 at 11:16 am


Romney grabbed almost half the evangelical vote.
Try again.



report abuse
 

nmstx

posted February 8, 2008 at 11:59 am


Latter-day Saints study the New Testament regularly, pray in the name of Christ, and have pictures of him all over our buildings. We celebrate Christmas and often send our children to Protestant preschools, where they fit in just fine. Others may wish to define “Christian” in a way that excludes us, but amongst ourselves, we have no doubts we are Christian. It ought to be to Romney’s credit that, amidst so many allegations of inauthenticity, he talks about Jesus Christ the way Mormons usually do.
He can’t win. Some accuse him of being an opportunist who change his views wherever the wind blows, while others would demand that he suppress basic tenets of his faith. Sometimes, oddly, the same people say both things.



report abuse
 

nmstx

posted February 8, 2008 at 12:00 pm


I meant, “pictures of Him.”



report abuse
 

RR

posted February 8, 2008 at 12:30 pm


He lost because he’s a phony. He was willing to disavow not only his past political beliefs, but even past polices that have proven over time to have worked brilliantly. If he’ll do that to get the nomination…then how can you believe anything he says?



report abuse
 

Doug

posted February 8, 2008 at 12:34 pm


Well, I believe Jesus is the son of God and Savior of mankind. I also think defending religion from secularism buys into the greatest red herring of recent history. I’m pretty disinterested in re-electing the Sanhedrin and extremely suspicious of anyone who succeeds in politics by pandering religion.
There’s this, too: It’s hard to call Romney “Too Christian” when his sincerity was his biggest weakness.



report abuse
 

Mike

posted February 8, 2008 at 12:35 pm


It didn’t help that Romney acted phonier than a three-dollar bill, so that anything he said was suspect. Evangelicals aren’t unique; any group is going to distrust someone who insist that he’s exactly like them, only more so.



report abuse
 

Woop

posted February 8, 2008 at 12:35 pm


Listen NMSTX, as a former Mormon who was on a mission, everything you say is false. The church may have pictures around to prosyletize and prove we are Christian, but the Jehovah Witnesses do too. Where does it count? In church, Christ’s name and person is rarely ever mentioned. Joseph Smith is mentioned more than Christ at any meeting. In houses, you see temples and Smith, not Jesus usually. People talk about Christ only out of obligation–like they have to, but we know there is not genuine regard. Just being honest for once for the church. Christ is an afterthought. And you know this.



report abuse
 

em

posted February 8, 2008 at 12:36 pm


“and have pictures of him all over our buildings.”
They had cameras 2000 years ago?



report abuse
 

Brian Horan

posted February 8, 2008 at 1:16 pm


I grew up Evangelical Christian. Old reels of Dobson talking about family dynamics were some of the earliest memories I had in my Bible-Church in the 1st 1/2 of the 80s. It was rare to see a movie in church.
My Bible-Church wasn’t to far from the LDS Temple under construction in Littleton at that time. We were taught explicitly that the LDS church was a cult.
The early 80s was a time the film ‘The Godmakers’ was being distributed. You can watch snippets of it on youtube.com (secret temple rituals, Mormon theology relating to deification).
Well, the Evangelical ‘king-maker’ Dobson supported Romney. My Evangelical leaning parents did too.
I gotta think that Evangelicals in Colorado Springs are shaking their heads wondering how the blatantly Evangelical organization was legitimizing what they consider to be a polytheistic cult in Dobson’s tacit endorsement of Romney.
I was raised to believe that our American Founding Fathers were just as Evangelical as our own church flavor was.
I know that’s BS now. Thirteen signers to the Constitution were Masons.
I have no problem with a candidate if as Jesus said his ‘yes is yes’ and his ‘no is no’. Romney failed that miserably.
I’ve met many Mormons who don’t believe they could make it to heaven through their own works. That would pass a Billy Graham litmus test.
So they’ve got the Trinity thing screwed up. How many Evangelicals understand the Trinity?
Since ’94 I dropped the Evangelical thing. I could never wrap my brain around how the ‘Sermon on the Mount’ coincided with ‘Supply Side’ economics’ preference for the rich.
Dobson, Robertson, Falwell, and Ralph Reed must all get it. They believe we need
Romney was such a dope, he campaigned at a car dealership in the Denver, metro area. Like we all trust car dealers? Yeah, maybe on planet Dobson.
Dobson is a piece of work to say the least. He’s been moaning about how we live in a Christian country for the last two decades.
As Ben Franklin put it: Those compounded of gospel and law end up betraying both, and us as well.
Maybe Dobson should be giving lectures on condo-flipping.



report abuse
 

Mike

posted February 8, 2008 at 3:14 pm


It is a shame that Romney’s kind of Christianity is not wanted in the Republican party. So much for the big tent acceptance of value voters. This is further evidence that the Republican party that has been formed by a large religious base can not show enough Christian good will to keep from falling apart. What goes around, comes around.



report abuse
 

Brian Horan

posted February 8, 2008 at 8:01 pm


Mike,
I couldn’t agree more.



report abuse
 

Jules

posted February 10, 2008 at 11:41 am


Mormons are in an impossible situation. They are accused of not being Christian, their beliefs are regularly presented in a dishonest way by those who claim to be experts or former members, but if they say anything it creates a new set of problems. However, I think a very ugly underbelly of evangelicism has been exposed to the world that they should have kept under cover. Ultimately, bigotry never fares well under bright lights so congratulations to Romney for being willing to stand up to it. It won’t be so difficult for the next candidate from the “wrong” religion.



report abuse
 

KathyC

posted February 18, 2008 at 3:30 pm


Woop- I don’t know when the last time you stepped in a Mormon church was which you “claim” to have served a mission for. Most of the members I know including myself have pictures of the temple, and of Jesus Christ on their wall- not Joseph Smith. EVERY talk in church, every testimony, every prayer is ended in the name of Jesus Christ- similar to swearing on the Bible in Court of days gone by.
We may mention Joseph Smith frequently- BUT it is as a prophet who we believe had a vision of who??? Jesus Christ. I don’t worship Joseph Smith anymore than jews worship Moses.
Joseph Smith taught that the first principals of the Gospel are 1st Faith in the Lord Jesus Christ,..(4th Article of Faith)
I think that Romney’s “Mormon” problems were dying down to some extent, but I think that Huckabee seemed happy to work to take him out for McCain- Romney being the other religious candidate was “handicapped” vs Huckabee- no local LDS bishop would have invited Romney in to speak to his congregation.



report abuse
 

Post a Comment

By submitting these comments, I agree to the beliefnet.com terms of service, rules of conduct and privacy policy (the "agreements"). I understand and agree that any content I post is licensed to beliefnet.com and may be used by beliefnet.com in accordance with the agreements.

Share this story


About Beliefnet

Our mission is to help people like you find, and walk, a spiritual path that will bring comfort, hope, clarity, strength, and happiness. More about Beliefnet.

Help

Media Kit

Subscribe

Legal

Copyright © Beliefnet, Inc. and/or its licensors. All rights reserved. Use of this site is subject to Terms of Service and to our Privacy Policy. Constructed by Beliefnet.

Advertisement

Report as Inappropriate

You are reporting this content because it violates the Terms of Service.

All reported content is logged for investigation.