Romney's Mormonism/Christianity, Cont'd
Friday February 8, 2008
Two posts in the comment box capture what I was talking about in my item about Romney and evangelicals: "You are right, Evengelicals (which I am) would vote for a non-Evangelical Christian. Remember Ronald Reagan? "But when it comes to...
Add to Del.icio.us
Add to Technorati
Add to Digg
Add to Newsvine
Add to Facebook
Add to StumbleUpon
Advertisement
Advertisement
Search This Blog
About Steven Waldman
Subscribe
Most Popular Posts
Hot Topics:
Righteous Posts:
Best Posts That No One Read:
- Our Patriotic Holy War
- Obama's White Family and Black Church
- Science & Religion Dispatched from Cambridge
Little Known Facts:
- The Rise of Prayerism
- Deism--It's Back!
- Abortion vs. Gays: The Evangelical Age Gap
- The Spiritual Atheists
Still Cracks Me Up:
Posts That Annoy Conservatives:
Posts That Annoy Liberals:
- Thomas Jefferson: Believer in Intelligent Design?
- Obama's White House Shouldn't Vet Prayers
- Agreeing with Values Voters
- Why the Catholic Bishops Matter on Health Care
- How to Defuse the Health Care Abortion Issue
- In Defense of Bloody Aborted Fetus Photos
Posts That Annoy Everyone:
Calendar
Tag Cloud
abortion, abortion health care, abortion reduction, barack obama, Barack Obama, casting stones, Catholic, Catholics, Christian, economy, election day '08, evangelicals, Founding Faith, Founding Fathers, gay marriage, health care, Islam, Jews, Judaism, mccain, national service, news, obama, Obama, politics, prayer, pro-life, republican convention, rick warren, sarah palin
There you have it? As an evangelical and a Republican Romney's mormonism has nothing to do with why I could not support him. I think what we are really looking at in this election is a three party election with only two names.
"If they were to say it’s up to each person to define his or her own Christianity, it makes a mockery of, well, a couple of thousand years of theological warfare." Not to mention what the Bible actually says about God the Father and our Lord Jesus Christ (you know, the whole Trinity thing).
"Not to mention what the Bible actually says about God the Father and our Lord Jesus Christ (you know, the whole Trinity thing)."
I thought "the whole Trinity thing" was something that had to be inferred from the Bible, not something ever explicitely outlined. Am I wrong?
As for the rest, I think Romney's Mormonism became a factor only because the media decided it should be. Reporters seized on an imagined parallel to Kennedy's Catholicism and ran with it. As is all too often the case in modern "journalism," the media failed to report on what really mattered to most voters.
Sure, you can find people to quote who did believe it was an issue, but most people simply didn't care and were, frankly, tired of hearing about it. They wanted to know where Romney stood on the Iraq war. They wanted to know what his plans were for the U.S. economy. They wanted to know, in short, his positions on issues that actually affected their lives and the future direction of the country, not on the religious tension between Evangelical Christians and Latter Day Saints.
Romney failed precisely because he did not resonate with voters on those issues they cared most about, not because of his Mormonism. That was just a phantom created by the media because they felt it was a story that could sell.
Romney failed, not because of the Mormon thing alone. He got hit by the Yuck Factor. It was simply very hard for people to take one look at him and not think, Yuck.
There are a number of factors that can really screw up a campaign, among them are the Yuck, Yawn and Yeeeech! factors.
Yawn is obvious. The candidate just puts everyone to sleep.
Yuck is when the candidate looks like the loan officer at the bank.
Yeeech is when you get endorsed by a Kennedy.
finally someone posts my beliefs
I thought Romney's plea was thoroughly upatriotic in that he basically disinfranchized every law abiding American citizen who doesn't believe in any god, gods, goddesses, great spirit, allah, when he made the comment that freedom requires faith or some such nonsense while pleading for people to accept his particular choice of indoctrination. It also let me know that he doesn't understand, nor can respect, that our Constitution, our Bill of Rights and our Declaration of Independence is bible-free and almost supernatural free altogether. There's only one reference to anything that could possibly be construed as religious/superstitious/supernatural and that's the one diestic reference to a Creator (not mormon, not christian, not jewish, not muslim). I think it's time we all return to our American heritage of secular government; a neutrality toward religion, and start having politicians "swear" on a the Constitution or not "swear" on anything at all........after all, shouldn't they be telling the truth at all times and not just when they're under oath?
Post a Comment
By submitting these comments, I agree to the beliefnet.com terms of service, rules of conduct and privacy policy (the "agreements"). I understand and agree that any content I post is licensed to beliefnet.com and may be used by beliefnet.com in accordance with the agreements.