Steven Waldman

N**ts to You, Rev. Jackson

Wednesday July 9, 2008


Most men might be irked if they heard that someone wanted to have their genitalia removed.
Barack Obama, however, is probably celebrating. Drudge Report says Jesse Jackson apparently was caught on tape suggesting the procedure for the Democratic nominee because he felt Obama was spending too much time lecturing black churches on morality.

If you're trying to prove you're not a black radical, it doesn't hurt to be attacked by Jesse Jackson for your moral prudishness.

It's not just vividness of Jackson's comments -- the delicate Drudge Report referred to the candidate's "n**ts" -- it's the substance. Jackson apparently was suggesting that Obama has focused too much on black behavior and not enough on the government's responsibility. If Obama is lucky, this will highlight some of what Obama's been saying in black churches. On Father's Day, Obama said to the congregation at Apostolic Church of God in Chicago (according the prepared text):

"If we are honest with ourselves, we'll admit that what too many fathers also are is missing -- missing from too many lives and too many homes. They have abandoned their responsibilities, acting like boys instead of men. And the foundations of our families are weaker because of it.

You and I know how true this is in the African-American community. We know that more than half of all black children live in single-parent households, a number that has doubled -- doubled -- since we were children. We know the statistics -- that children who grow up without a father are five times more likely to live in poverty and commit crime; nine times more likely to drop out of schools and 20 times more likely to end up in prison. They are more likely to have behavioral problems, or run away from home or become teenage parents themselves. And the foundations of our community are weaker because of it.

How many times in the last year has this city lost a child at the hands of another child? How many times have our hearts stopped in the middle of the night with the sound of a gunshot or a siren? How many teenagers have we seen hanging around on street corners when they should be sitting in a classroom? How many are sitting in prison when they should be working, or at least looking for a job? How many in this generation are we willing to lose to poverty or violence or addiction? How many?

Yes, we need more cops on the street. Yes, we need fewer guns in the hands of people who shouldn't have them. Yes, we need more money for our schools, and more outstanding teachers in the classroom, and more after-school programs for our children. Yes, we need more jobs and more job training and more opportunity in our communities.

But we also need families to raise our children. We need fathers to realize that responsibility does not end at conception. We need them to realize that what makes you a man is not the ability to have a child -- it's the courage to raise one."

Here's the full speech on video:


Everyone kept wondering when Obama was going to have his Sister Souljah moment (a reference to Bill Clinton going out of his way to diss the star over nasty rap lyrics to show he was a centrist). Maybe Obama didn't need that after all. He just needed for one of his supporters to suggest his castration. Obama gets all the breaks.

Comments
Mr. Incredible
July 11, 2008 2:07 PM

==Thank you, Mr, Incredible. In fact, I knew that; but the fingers and the brain did not entirely mesh at that moment.==

I didn't mean to come off as harshly overcorrecting, if, in fact, you got that impression.

I've heard "beholding" before -- or, as teenagers/early 20-somethings say, "beholdeen"; they turn the "eeng" into "een" -- and it seems to me that it comes from hearing the proper pronunciation, "beholden," thinking that "beholden" is a mispronunciation of "beholding," when it's not, as you know.

Anonymous
July 11, 2008 7:30 PM

Nope. No problem. Glad to see some folks who prefer accuracy in linguistics. The internet and texting have certainly not helped iin that regard!

Mr. Incredible
July 11, 2008 8:17 PM

==Glad to see some folks who prefer accuracy in linguistics.==

I used to be in radio news and some teevee news. Anchor, reporter, writer, and I was always fine-tuning my language. I hate to see and hear radio and teevee people sound as though they slept through English, speaking like stupid people.

I heard a tlevision news anchor, taling about the Olympics the other day, and she mentioned something about a contender in the Shortput, saying, "throwing the shotput."

Well, immediately, I called the newsroom and said that the "ball" is the "shot," and that the "throw" is the "put," that the "thrower" puts the shot, not throws the put. My goodness.

I hate split infinitives, too, cuz you can't split thinking, and the infinitive references a specific process of thought that cannot be split.

Now, don't get me wrong. I, myself, for effect, use informal forms, like "wanna" and, thanks to Steve Harvey Show, some street language.

However, today's news presenter knows nothing else and, what's more, doesn't even care! Yet, they try to tell us that they are accurate, objective, credible!

== The internet and texting have certainly not helped iin that regard!==

Still, intelligent people know how to shuttle between forms of language, in order to suit the situation.

Anonymous
July 11, 2008 8:20 PM

CORRECTION
"I heard a tlevision news anchor, taling about the Olympics the other day, and she mentioned something about a contender in the Shortput, saying, 'throwing the shotput.'"

See? There go my fingers now.

CORRECTED: I heard a television news anchor, talking about the Olympics the other day, and she mentioned something about a contender in the Shotput, saying, "throwing the shotput."

Mr. Incredible
July 11, 2008 8:23 PM

That last post is from me. My name didn't take.

Read All Comments

Post a Comment

By submitting these comments, I agree to the beliefnet.com terms of service, rules of conduct and privacy policy (the "agreements"). I understand and agree that any content I post is licensed to beliefnet.com and may be used by beliefnet.com in accordance with the agreements.



Please type the text you see in the box below to verify your post and help us prevent spam.

Type the characters you see in the picture above.

Advertisement

Search This Blog

feed icon Subscribe

RSS Feed

Receive updates from Steven Waldman

Calendar


About Beliefnet

Our mission is to help people like you find, and walk, a spiritual path that will bring comfort, hope, clarity, strength, and happiness. More about Beliefnet.

Legal

Copyright © Beliefnet, Inc. and/or its licensors. All rights reserved. Use of this site is subject to Terms of Service and to our Privacy Policy. Constructed by Beliefnet.

Advertisement