Steven Waldman

Gay Rights as National Security Issue

Friday August 15, 2008

Not surprisingly, the draft Democratic platform includes repeal of the don't-ask-don't-tell policy for gays in the military. What was striking was where in the platform the Democrats put this declaration.

The 2004 Democratic platform called for "equal treatment of servicemen"...in a section on civil rights.

The 2008 platform point-blank calls for the repeal of "don't-ask-don't-tell"...in the section on national security:

"Allow All Americans to Serve We will also put national security above divisive politics. More than 10,000 service men and women have been discharged on the basis of sexual orientation since the "Don't Ask, Don't Tell" policy was implemented, at a cost of over $360 million. Many of those forced out had special skills in high demand, such as translators, engineers and pilots. At a time when the military is having a tough time recruiting and retaining troops, it is wrong to deny our country the service of brave, qualified people. We support the repeal of "Don't Ask Don't Tell" and the implementation of policies to allow qualified men and women to serve openly regardless of sexual orientation."

Since it was conventional wisdom in the 1990s that Bill Clinton's early political problems stemmed in part from efforts to allow gays in the military, it's interesting that Obama is going so directly at this. He is either a) a stronger believer in gay rights; b) more politically tone deaf; c) more politically astute, having found a shrewder way of framing the issue; or d) tapping into profound changes in public opinion since 1993.

Some historians believe that African American service in World War II helped shift American atittudes (both black and white) on race. Will 9/11 and the Iraq war be seen as key factors in the progress of gay rights?

Advertisement
Comments
Michael
August 15, 2008 10:21 AM

Obama is (a) (c) and (d). A lot has changed since 1993. We are actually having a serious discussion of gay marriage as an issue of equality and human dignity; that would have been unfathomable in 1993. We also see the impact of DADT, where well-trained, well-qualified experts are booted out of the military because of concerns about showers. The recent House hearing on DADT showed sophisticated reasons for eliminating the ban and nutty rationalizations that even embarrassed supporters for keeping the ban.

pagansister
August 15, 2008 7:39 PM

Another good reason to vote NOT Republican. What difference does a persons sexual orientation make? It is ridiculous that so many highly skilled soldiers have been booted because they were gay.

Post a Comment

By submitting these comments, I agree to the beliefnet.com terms of service, rules of conduct and privacy policy (the "agreements"). I understand and agree that any content I post is licensed to beliefnet.com and may be used by beliefnet.com in accordance with the agreements.



Please type the text you see in the box below to verify your post and help us prevent spam. You have a limited time to type - you may wish to compose your comment in a separate document and paste it here upon completion.

Type the characters you see in the picture above.

Advertisement

Search This Blog

feed icon Subscribe

RSS Feed

Receive updates from Steven Waldman

Calendar

Advertisement

Advertisement


About Beliefnet

Our mission is to help people like you find, and walk, a spiritual path that will bring comfort, hope, clarity, strength, and happiness. More about Beliefnet.

Legal

Copyright © Beliefnet, Inc. and/or its licensors. All rights reserved. Use of this site is subject to Terms of Service and to our Privacy Policy. Constructed by Beliefnet.

Advertisement

Report as Inappropriate

You are reporting this content because it violates the Terms of Service.

All reported content is logged for investigation.