|
Previous Posts
Good Bye
Today is my last day at Beliefnet (which I co-founded in 1999). The swirling emotions: sadness, relief, love, humility, pride, anxiety.
But mostly deep, deep gratitude.
How many people get to come up with an idea and have rich people invest money to make it a reality? How many people get to create
posted 8:37:24am Nov. 20, 2009 |
read full post
»
"Steven Waldman Named To Lead Commission Effort on Future of Media In a Changing Technological Landscape" (FCC Press Release)
STEVEN WALDMAN NAMED TO LEAD COMMISSION EFFORT ON FUTURE OF MEDIA IN A CHANGING TECHNOLOGICAL LANDSCAPE
FCC chairman Julius Genachowski announced today the appointment of Steven Waldman, a highly respected internet entrepreneur and journalist, to lead an agency-wide initiative to assess the state o
posted 11:46:42am Oct. 29, 2009 |
read full post
»
My Big News
Dear Readers,
This is the most difficult (and surreal) post I've had to write. I'm leaving Beliefnet, the company I co-founded in 1999.
In mid November, I'll be stepping down as President and Editor in Chief to lead a project on the future of the media for the Federal Communications Commission, the
posted 1:10:11pm Oct. 28, 2009 |
read full post
»
"Beliefnet Co-Founder and Editor-in-Chief Steps Down to Lead FCC Future of the Media Initiative" (Beliefnet Press Release)
October 28, 2009
BELIEFNET CO-FOUNDER AND EDITOR-IN-CHIEF STEPS DOWN TO LEAD FCC FUTURE OF THE MEDIA INITIATIVE
New York, NY - October 28, 2009 - Beliefnet, the leading online community for inspiration and faith, announced today that Steven Waldman, co-founder, president and editor-in-chief, will re
posted 1:05:43pm Oct. 28, 2009 |
read full post
»
Secularizing the Cross (Christian Activists: Be Careful What You Wish For)
The Supreme Court heard oral arguments this week, in Buono v. Salazar, about whether a white 6 1/2 foot cross can be displayed in a national park as a tribute to World War I soldiers. Though it's depicted as a classic clash of the secular and the religious, it actually illustrates why Christian act
posted 1:15:51pm Oct. 08, 2009 |
read full post
»
|
posted August 31, 2008 at 4:02 pm
“For Obama to avoid this fate, he’s probably going to do a Sister Souljah on those Democrats who mock Palin, specifically coming to her defense on matters of faith.”
Ironic, given it should be McCain having a Sister Souljah moment with the far right of his party, instead of handing them their own veep candidate.
I don’t see why Obama should have to apologize for having supporters who question a modern political candidate who supports creationism. Has our disourse gotten to the point that we have to ignore science and good education policy because a small number of people believe in creationism? That Obama’s “faith outreach” needs to be sensitive to not offend creationists?
I mean, I understand your point. In the modern political world, we can’t afford to offend Christian conservatives. Obama thinks he needs to bend over backwards to be nice to folks who work against the Democrat’s agenda. I get that.
But doesn’t Palin’s nomination mean that Obama doesn’t really need to pander to that crowd. They are no longer disaffected. They may no longer be up for grabs. So why indulge creationism just to score political points with people who are opposed to your agenda and probably unattainable politically?
posted August 31, 2008 at 5:41 pm
Anyone stupid enough to believe in magical creation (or what Liars for Jesus call intelligent design) is not going to vote for Obama anyway. There’s no reason for Obama to suck up to religious insanity.
posted August 31, 2008 at 6:40 pm
Obama has always said that he feels a person of faith may believe in evolution. He’s always supported public schools teaching good science and relegating religion to other venues. As difficult as it may be to believe, millions and millions of *religious) Americans agree. All he has to do is go on saying what he’s been saying.