Steven Waldman

Steven Waldman

Explaining McCain’s Strange Silence on National Service

posted by swaldman | 10:59pm Wednesday September 10, 2008

The other day I wondered allowed if I’d missed some big John McCain national service speech. He’d been a big advocate of civilian service for years but I hadn’t heard anything about it, while Obama has been emphasizing it (more about Obama’s plan here).
Paul Glastris, the editor of the Washington Monthly, which published McCain’s plea for national service a few years back, provides the answer: McCain has indeed stopped talking about it:

Whatever the reason, the Arizona senator has spent this presidential season eloquently exhorting young people to “serve a cause higher than self” while studiously avoiding mention of any new measures to create more opportunities for such service. He took a weeklong “Service to America” speaking tour this spring, during which he said nothing about national service. His website is bereft of information on the subject. When reporters ask his campaign for anything in writing on the candidate’s national service agenda, they are sent copies of his 2001 Washington Monthly article.

Why would he shy away? One theory: while national service has become broadly popular, earning support from people like Mitt Romney and George W. Bush, it has remained unpopular with some of the most conservative anti-government parts of the party. If McCain’s challenge was juicing up the base, why talk about something would alienate the anti-government hardliners? It’s not like anyone other than a few national service junkies would notice that the stopped talking about it. So why take the risk?
One subtext of the Republican convention was that being a soldier is real service; being a community organizer (i.e. civilian service) was comical if not diabolical. If he backed a big community service proposal, perhaps that would have undermined that culture-war argument.
McCain will have a chance to rectify that today (Thursday). He and Obama will both appear at ServiceNation, a conference promoting community and national service. I’m sure he’ll talk positively about serving one’s nation. The key question is whether he’ll be specific, as he once was. I’ll report back.



Previous Posts

Good Bye
Today is my last day at Beliefnet (which I co-founded in 1999). The swirling emotions: sadness, relief, love, humility, pride, anxiety. But mostly deep, deep gratitude. How many people get to come up with an idea and have rich people invest money to make it a reality? How many people get to create

posted 8:37:24am Nov. 20, 2009 | read full post »

"Steven Waldman Named To Lead Commission Effort on Future of Media In a Changing Technological Landscape" (FCC Press Release)
STEVEN WALDMAN NAMED TO LEAD COMMISSION EFFORT ON FUTURE OF MEDIA IN A CHANGING TECHNOLOGICAL LANDSCAPE FCC chairman Julius Genachowski announced today the appointment of Steven Waldman, a highly respected internet entrepreneur and journalist, to lead an agency-wide initiative to assess the state o

posted 11:46:42am Oct. 29, 2009 | read full post »

My Big News
Dear Readers, This is the most difficult (and surreal) post I've had to write. I'm leaving Beliefnet, the company I co-founded in 1999. In mid November, I'll be stepping down as President and Editor in Chief to lead a project on the future of the media for the Federal Communications Commission, the

posted 1:10:11pm Oct. 28, 2009 | read full post »

"Beliefnet Co-Founder and Editor-in-Chief Steps Down to Lead FCC Future of the Media Initiative" (Beliefnet Press Release)
October 28, 2009 BELIEFNET CO-FOUNDER AND EDITOR-IN-CHIEF STEPS DOWN TO LEAD FCC FUTURE OF THE MEDIA INITIATIVE New York, NY - October 28, 2009 - Beliefnet, the leading online community for inspiration and faith, announced today that Steven Waldman, co-founder, president and editor-in-chief, will re

posted 1:05:43pm Oct. 28, 2009 | read full post »

Secularizing the Cross (Christian Activists: Be Careful What You Wish For)
The Supreme Court heard oral arguments this week, in Buono v. Salazar, about whether a white 6 1/2 foot cross can be displayed in a national park as a tribute to World War I soldiers. Though it's depicted as a classic clash of the secular and the religious, it actually illustrates why Christian act

posted 1:15:51pm Oct. 08, 2009 | read full post »

Advertisement
Comments read comments(7)
post a comment
Sherry

posted September 11, 2008 at 12:49 am


Sorry Steven, (and I love your postings)
>
Don’t you mean “I wondered aloud”?
On point, I too wonder how McCain will proceed on any number of topics.
His own “strange silence” on many important issues and his keeping Palin away from the media is curious at best.



report abuse
 

cx

posted September 11, 2008 at 5:50 am


That’s a subject that didn’t poll well with his target audience.
That’s all. Senator McCain doesn’t have time for things that don’t poll well any more.



report abuse
 

hootie1fan

posted September 11, 2008 at 10:05 am


It’s not being a “real” soldier that matters to the right wing and for the record John McCain was officially a sailor (even pilots in the US Navy are officialy sailors).
Just look at how they treated some of those who actually serviced in theatre of operations and all of them are Democrats: Max Cleland (amputee), John Kerry (Purple Heart 3), Al Gore, Jack Murtha (37 years), Bob Kerry (Medal of Honor), Jim Webb, Jimmy Carter, Tammy Duckworth (amputee), Paul Hackett, etc.



report abuse
 

Mike C

posted September 11, 2008 at 10:38 am


I would say that McCain has also dropped mentioning national service because he knows, if he is elected, he’ll bring back the draft. He actually supported this in response to a question at a town hall meeting not too long ago.



report abuse
 

Alex

posted September 11, 2008 at 10:58 am


McCain led the republican side to keep Clinton’s Americorps going. In other words, he actually took action and made something happen because it made sense for America. It is clear that McCain both supports service and given the opportunity do something positive to support it. It is also clear that it not a point of differentiation between candidates. Better to focus on lack of real experience and lack of any legislative achievement in Obama’s experience short resume.



report abuse
 

Charles Cosimano

posted September 11, 2008 at 2:49 pm


McCain cannot bring back the draft without an act of Congress and he won’t get that act because no one in Congress is quite ready to commit suicide. National Service is an idea whose time is never going to come because every parent and grandparent in the country would never forgive anyone dumb enough to vote for it.



report abuse
 

Roon

posted September 11, 2008 at 4:33 pm


The forum tonight (Sept. 11) with Obama and McCain will be streamed live
here.
The Service Nation blog is a good source of info as well.



report abuse
 

Post a Comment

By submitting these comments, I agree to the beliefnet.com terms of service, rules of conduct and privacy policy (the "agreements"). I understand and agree that any content I post is licensed to beliefnet.com and may be used by beliefnet.com in accordance with the agreements.

Share this story


About Beliefnet

Our mission is to help people like you find, and walk, a spiritual path that will bring comfort, hope, clarity, strength, and happiness. More about Beliefnet.

Help

Media Kit

Subscribe

Legal

Copyright © Beliefnet, Inc. and/or its licensors. All rights reserved. Use of this site is subject to Terms of Service and to our Privacy Policy. Constructed by Beliefnet.

Advertisement

Report as Inappropriate

You are reporting this content because it violates the Terms of Service.

All reported content is logged for investigation.