Steven Waldman

Steven Waldman

Old

posted by swaldman | 10:00pm Tuesday October 7, 2008

John McCain was begging for debates in the town hall format. But I’m taking the minority position that it actually hurt him. When he padded around the platform, he looked like an old man, late at night, looking for the refrigerator. It’s not exactly that he looked tired. It’s that his gait seemed that of a sprightly but elderly gent.
And there was that odd moment when Obama was talking and McCain wandered in and out of the background like he was lost.
McCain apparently performs well in these formats when alone but apparently his campaign didn’t realize that the dynamic is entirely different when there’s another man, a younger man, on the stage, too.
They both had some good moments substantively — McCain’s close was particularly strong — but the atmospherics favored Obama.
UPDATE: A few other things that occurred to me while walking the dog:
The first few times that McCain talked about how unpopular he is in the Senate it seemed a sign of his independence. But his constant reminder of how everyone there hates him – combined with his petulance toward Obama – makes one wonder: how can he get things done in Congress if they can’t stand him?
McCain thinks “bipartisanship” is the same thing as having a willingness to buck your own party. He criticized Obama for not breaking with the Democrats enough. That’s actually a very inside-the-beltway mentality. Many establishment journalists use that as a test of a candidate’s integrity. But most people who succeed across party lines do so without actually alienating their own party, think: Ted Kennedy and Orrin Hatch. Because McCain’s particular efforts at bipartisanship have indeed irritated the Republican party – especially campaign finance reform – he’s come to equate the two. But to most Americans, it’s the guy who seems respectful of his opponents who is most likely to successfully work across party lines.
Finally, was McCain’s strange joke about hair transplants meant to be a dig at Joe Biden?



Previous Posts

Good Bye
Today is my last day at Beliefnet (which I co-founded in 1999). The swirling emotions: sadness, relief, love, humility, pride, anxiety. But mostly deep, deep gratitude. How many people get to come up with an idea and have rich people invest money to make it a reality? How many people get to create

posted 8:37:24am Nov. 20, 2009 | read full post »

"Steven Waldman Named To Lead Commission Effort on Future of Media In a Changing Technological Landscape" (FCC Press Release)
STEVEN WALDMAN NAMED TO LEAD COMMISSION EFFORT ON FUTURE OF MEDIA IN A CHANGING TECHNOLOGICAL LANDSCAPE FCC chairman Julius Genachowski announced today the appointment of Steven Waldman, a highly respected internet entrepreneur and journalist, to lead an agency-wide initiative to assess the state o

posted 11:46:42am Oct. 29, 2009 | read full post »

My Big News
Dear Readers, This is the most difficult (and surreal) post I've had to write. I'm leaving Beliefnet, the company I co-founded in 1999. In mid November, I'll be stepping down as President and Editor in Chief to lead a project on the future of the media for the Federal Communications Commission, the

posted 1:10:11pm Oct. 28, 2009 | read full post »

"Beliefnet Co-Founder and Editor-in-Chief Steps Down to Lead FCC Future of the Media Initiative" (Beliefnet Press Release)
October 28, 2009 BELIEFNET CO-FOUNDER AND EDITOR-IN-CHIEF STEPS DOWN TO LEAD FCC FUTURE OF THE MEDIA INITIATIVE New York, NY - October 28, 2009 - Beliefnet, the leading online community for inspiration and faith, announced today that Steven Waldman, co-founder, president and editor-in-chief, will re

posted 1:05:43pm Oct. 28, 2009 | read full post »

Secularizing the Cross (Christian Activists: Be Careful What You Wish For)
The Supreme Court heard oral arguments this week, in Buono v. Salazar, about whether a white 6 1/2 foot cross can be displayed in a national park as a tribute to World War I soldiers. Though it's depicted as a classic clash of the secular and the religious, it actually illustrates why Christian act

posted 1:15:51pm Oct. 08, 2009 | read full post »

Advertisement
Comments read comments(6)
post a comment
Sandy Schwartz

posted October 7, 2008 at 11:39 pm


Agree totally!!!! Not at all favorable to McCain. Also, he, like Palin, was intensely reading from notes in between comments. Which took away from the idea that these were spontaneous answers. Did anyone else notice this!!??



report abuse
 

Stan

posted October 8, 2008 at 1:10 am


Everyone assumes because John McCain has been in Congress he has had major accomplishments.
Read about McCain on Wikipedia, the majority of the information is about McCain’s military career.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/John_McCain
Part of the McCain-Feingold Act in 2002 has been found to be unconstitutional in several different courts. McCain is currently exploiting loop-holes that he has been trying to close.
McCain should attend a charm school and stop bragging about not being known as Mr. Congeniality.
Every time McCain went negative, the bars on the CNN site of men and women rating the debate went down. Obama consistently got the higher ratings, especially from women.



report abuse
 

Rob

posted October 8, 2008 at 3:54 am


It’s a lot harder to play to a mixed crowd. As someone who admires but will not vote for John McCain this time, I have the feeling that tonight’s performance closed the book on his presidential ambitions.



report abuse
 

Warren Cheswick

posted October 8, 2008 at 7:29 am


The question I kept asking myself last night as I watched this debate was how anyone could actually vote for this guy (McCain) and this party (Rep.) over Obama. Obama comes off as smarter, kinder, and more concerned for the welfare of “Joe six-pack.” His tax policy doesn’t reward corporate greed. He has had to join in the mudslinging this past week because he can’t let McCain “swift-boat” him like Rove did Kerry, but it was all done in self-defense. And turns out that Sarah Palin hasn’t been such a boon for McCain after all, so there’s that flub to take into consideration. A guy who talks about clean energy while at the same time promising to build “nuclear power plants all over the place” is scary. McCain is too old and too tied to the failed policy and philosophy of Bush.



report abuse
 

jestrfyl

posted October 8, 2008 at 11:05 am


Sort of like Nixon and his choice to avoid makeup on TV 48 years ago, McCain should have realized that he would look older and smaller when physically next to Obama. They may adapt the camera and adjust the lights when it is only him. But when the camera is on them both, and the lights create as many shadows (wrinkles) as highlights (wavy silver v. short, dark hair)on both, McCain did not fare well.
Also, McCain sould have used a good dramatic coach. It is not good to wander around the stage when someone else is speaking. It distracts the audience (which may have been his intent), which then expects the wanderer to do something (which McCain could not do). Otherwise, stand still and listen – or at least make it look like you are listening.
These events are more theater than rhetoric or – who would imagine – an actual “debate”. So they should have some theatrical advice as well as all the other stuff. Who really cares about the facts if one of the two players looks more lost, appears less engaged, and simply drifts away (even if standing still)?



report abuse
 

pagansister

posted October 10, 2008 at 9:39 pm


Unfortunately McCain didn’t come off well at all, IMO, in the Town Hall debate. His age did show. As mentioned above, I too noticed him wandering around the stage while Obama was talking, definitely not polite. If he has trouble physically, with sitting on a chair, perhaps he could have just stood by his chair.
That debate didn’t help him at all, and with Sarah at his side…he’ll be sinking farther from his goal. She certainy isn’t helping anything.



report abuse
 

Post a Comment

By submitting these comments, I agree to the beliefnet.com terms of service, rules of conduct and privacy policy (the "agreements"). I understand and agree that any content I post is licensed to beliefnet.com and may be used by beliefnet.com in accordance with the agreements.

Share this story


About Beliefnet

Our mission is to help people like you find, and walk, a spiritual path that will bring comfort, hope, clarity, strength, and happiness. More about Beliefnet.

Help

Media Kit

Subscribe

Legal

Copyright © Beliefnet, Inc. and/or its licensors. All rights reserved. Use of this site is subject to Terms of Service and to our Privacy Policy. Constructed by Beliefnet.

Advertisement

Report as Inappropriate

You are reporting this content because it violates the Terms of Service.

All reported content is logged for investigation.