Palin: Homosexuality Is a Choice
Wednesday October 1, 2008
In her interview with Katie Couric, Palin says one of her closest friends is gay. Interestingly, she describes it as a choice -- a key dividing line between social conservatives (who argue that it is a choice) and many others...
Filed Under: homosexuality, sarah palin
Add to Del.icio.us
Add to Technorati
Add to Digg
Add to Newsvine
Add to Facebook
Add to StumbleUpon
Advertisement
Advertisement
Search This Blog
About Steven Waldman
Subscribe
Most Popular Posts
Hot Topics:
Righteous Posts:
Best Posts That No One Read:
- Our Patriotic Holy War
- Obama's White Family and Black Church
- Science & Religion Dispatched from Cambridge
Little Known Facts:
- The Rise of Prayerism
- Deism--It's Back!
- Abortion vs. Gays: The Evangelical Age Gap
- The Spiritual Atheists
Still Cracks Me Up:
Posts That Annoy Conservatives:
Posts That Annoy Liberals:
- Thomas Jefferson: Believer in Intelligent Design?
- Obama's White House Shouldn't Vet Prayers
- Agreeing with Values Voters
- Why the Catholic Bishops Matter on Health Care
- How to Defuse the Health Care Abortion Issue
- In Defense of Bloody Aborted Fetus Photos
Posts That Annoy Everyone:
Calendar
Tag Cloud
abortion, abortion health care, abortion reduction, barack obama, Barack Obama, casting stones, Catholic, Catholics, Christian, economy, election day '08, evangelicals, Founding Faith, Founding Fathers, gay marriage, health care, Islam, Jews, Judaism, mccain, national service, news, obama, Obama, politics, prayer, pro-life, republican convention, rick warren, sarah palin
Considering the sort of position she has been placed in, it was probably the best answer that could be expected of her. At least she did not say that they should be fed to the polar bears.
I think the jury is still out on the issue of homosexuality being a "choice". Since many homosexual people felt an affinity for the same sex since early childhood, it's difficult to say whether that can be considered a "choice". Can one choose at say, age 4? Can one know what is implied in that choice as an adult? I don't think so. I think that most parents would agree that their children come somewhat "ready made" with their own strengths and weaknesses regardless of what parents would like them to be. Some children are natural artists or mathematicians. Is that a choice too? I don't think so.
Gee, how big of Sarah to accept her friend's "choice" to be a lesbian. She doesn't judge people. I'm so impressed! :o) (not) Though some still think it is a choice, I can't understand why anyone would choose to be discriminated against by the laws that still are on the books and treated like a "sinner" with the whole bit about hell by some who think there is such a place, as well as other ways. I can't imagine choosing that for any reason.
If you're going to quote her, quote her correctly. First of all, she says nothing about that particular church's bulletin, but I'm sure you meant to tie her into what the particular church is doing by stating that fact just as Couric tried to tie her into it by flashing the picture behind her interview. She is not a member of that church. What she said was this:
"When the media gets it wrong it frustrates Americans who are just trying to get the facts and be able to make up their mind about a persons’ values. You know what, I don’t know what prayers are worthy of being prayed and what prayers are going to be answered or not answered. "
Once again, the media, you, gets it wrong.
I personally believe that the question of whether homosexuality is a choice is irrelevant to the gay-rights debate. While it is deplorable to discriminate against someone because of something that they can't change, that doesn't mean that it is the only form of unacceptable discrimination. For instance, most people would agree that religion (or faith, spirituality, etc.) is clearly a choice. Yet religion is protected in the first amendment. And what could be more of a choice than speech, which is also protected in the first amendment?
Suppose a man were fired because he only dated redhaired women? That would be a form of absurd and unacceptable discrimination, and I would oppose it. Yet an argument that he could only date redhaired women would be laughed out of the public debate.
There is too much scientific evidence that being homosexuality is not a choice for most people. The treatment of homosexuality by some Christians is appalling.
How about people born with both male and female parts? Was that a "choice?"
Within my denomination, there has been considerable disagreement about the Church's statement on homosexuality. There have been attempts at each major church conference to have a more accepting statement, which still has not happened. Many individuals churches are very accepting of homosexuality.
A few months ago, the Presbyterian Church voted to allow ordaining homosexuals.
I pray that someday Christians will accept homosexuals as equal children of God.
A saying:
God don't make no junk.
Homosexuals by virtue of their nature are sexually attracted to members of the same sex. Even though there are variants in all of creation and degrees of attraction as evidenced by the famous Kinsey Report of the 1950's, true homosexuals are exclusively attracted to their own sex. If homosexuality were a choice then you are saying that heterosexuals could also be homosexuals and feel just as sexually attracted to their own sex but choose not to. No honest true heterosexual would ever claim to be attracted to their own sex.
We should be more concerned with being loving compassionate beings and minding our own business than judging anyone elses.
Religion. Now THAT'S a choice.
Post a Comment
By submitting these comments, I agree to the beliefnet.com terms of service, rules of conduct and privacy policy (the "agreements"). I understand and agree that any content I post is licensed to beliefnet.com and may be used by beliefnet.com in accordance with the agreements.