|
Previous Posts
Good Bye
Today is my last day at Beliefnet (which I co-founded in 1999). The swirling emotions: sadness, relief, love, humility, pride, anxiety.
But mostly deep, deep gratitude.
How many people get to come up with an idea and have rich people invest money to make it a reality? How many people get to create
posted 8:37:24am Nov. 20, 2009 |
read full post
»
"Steven Waldman Named To Lead Commission Effort on Future of Media In a Changing Technological Landscape" (FCC Press Release)
STEVEN WALDMAN NAMED TO LEAD COMMISSION EFFORT ON FUTURE OF MEDIA IN A CHANGING TECHNOLOGICAL LANDSCAPE
FCC chairman Julius Genachowski announced today the appointment of Steven Waldman, a highly respected internet entrepreneur and journalist, to lead an agency-wide initiative to assess the state o
posted 11:46:42am Oct. 29, 2009 |
read full post
»
My Big News
Dear Readers,
This is the most difficult (and surreal) post I've had to write. I'm leaving Beliefnet, the company I co-founded in 1999.
In mid November, I'll be stepping down as President and Editor in Chief to lead a project on the future of the media for the Federal Communications Commission, the
posted 1:10:11pm Oct. 28, 2009 |
read full post
»
"Beliefnet Co-Founder and Editor-in-Chief Steps Down to Lead FCC Future of the Media Initiative" (Beliefnet Press Release)
October 28, 2009
BELIEFNET CO-FOUNDER AND EDITOR-IN-CHIEF STEPS DOWN TO LEAD FCC FUTURE OF THE MEDIA INITIATIVE
New York, NY - October 28, 2009 - Beliefnet, the leading online community for inspiration and faith, announced today that Steven Waldman, co-founder, president and editor-in-chief, will re
posted 1:05:43pm Oct. 28, 2009 |
read full post
»
Secularizing the Cross (Christian Activists: Be Careful What You Wish For)
The Supreme Court heard oral arguments this week, in Buono v. Salazar, about whether a white 6 1/2 foot cross can be displayed in a national park as a tribute to World War I soldiers. Though it's depicted as a classic clash of the secular and the religious, it actually illustrates why Christian act
posted 1:15:51pm Oct. 08, 2009 |
read full post
»
|
posted October 21, 2008 at 9:06 pm
The trouble with Sarah Palin is that she makes a mockery of her
professed Christianity by distorting information, and using innuendo to suggest Barack Obama could be a terrorist and that’s a reason to fear him. Also, the comment made by Joe Biden about Obama being tested as President by other countries creating crises to see how he’d respond.
Surely Joe did not mean that Obama isn’t capable of responding appropriately, but she interpreted it that way anyway. John McCain would be tested too. One can always wonder if he’s capable to responding appropriately, because he too will be tested.
As a Christian, I do think that honesty and integrity count. I don’t see that coming from Sarah. I wonder why so many people don’t see what to me seems so obvious! Both she and John mcCain use innuendo and pretend they are merely raising honest questions.
posted October 21, 2008 at 10:41 pm
I thought she gave a weak testimony..
posted October 22, 2008 at 12:12 am
I was going to vote for Obama, then I found out he was a Christian….
Aw well maybe there’s hope for him yet. Palin’s a hopelessly intolerant arrogant Christian though. And judging by the way she has behaved in this campaign, she doesn’t have a clue what Jesus’ message was or who he was. Obama is a much better example of Jesus. He doesn’t make Christianity look like a bunch of angry, rude, lying, self-serving, intolerant hypocrites. He just might be transformational for Christianity’s horrible public image.
posted October 22, 2008 at 11:01 am
I have struggled over the past few months with trying to “chew and swallow” the very mixed messages we are receiving from the candidates on the trail.
Whatever your religious affiliation, I believe that true spirituality is found in the person who is not only tolerant of all the creations/people of God, but also makes a conscious decision to live a good life.
I am imperfect, and I have made mistakes. Each day, I hope for the strength to be a better person, to use the gifts I’ve been given.
I wonder these days if the candidates lie awake at night, knowing that some of their choices of conduct are very different from the pious comments they make about their faith. For what? To win a race…
I am deeply concerned that Ms. Palin has decided that in order for her to be right, someone has to be wrong…
Ms. Palin’s image of faith has been spun to the point that I’m not sure what she stands for…she is willing to let go of and skirt questions about her faith for an election…what else is she willing to let go or justify in the name of power.
I pray for the Americans who are suffering right now. Maybe the ones in a war they disagree with, or the family packing their belongings to move from a foreclosed home. I pray to not only “my ” God, but to whomever may be listening. I am praying that we can elevate this country out of the mud.
posted October 22, 2008 at 12:07 pm
Palin is a hack. She’s McCain’s hatchet-woman, doing the dirty work of the party by throwing out all the character assassination remarks and incredible accusations that McCain’s people won’t let Johnny Boy do because they are trying so hard to portray him as a nice guy who goes across party lines and cares only about America, not party politics. So she’s a way of allowing the ticket to have its proverbial cake and eat it too.
Trouble is, we’ve all seen this before with Bush and his crew, and so most people aren’t falling for it. McCain had no shot in hell without Palin, but I have to think that in the end, she only polarizes people further, and drives more of the “middle” further into Obama’s camp.
Regarding her position on religion, it’s the same as everything else she says about just about any of the big issues (abortion, creationism, etc. etc. etc.). When she’s preaching to the choir, she tells them what they want to hear, or she comes across as being part of the fringe extreme. When she is called out on it, she backpedals, obfuscates, or simply refuses to answer the question. She sometimes flat out contradicts herself (see her various statements about Roe v. Wade). Despite all this taking place in the media where we can all match up her various contradictory statements, she still positions herself in the role of “maverick” who is unlike all those Washington politicians with their lies, their scandals, their flip-flopping, and their sophistry. Yeah, right.
So I don’t know about you folks, but I’m certainly not buying it.
posted May 26, 2011 at 10:01 pm
I like it very much, thank you