Steven Waldman

Steven Waldman

“Stupid” and “Mindless” Catholics

posted by swaldman | 1:19pm Tuesday November 25, 2008

Conservative George Weigel at the Ethics and Public Policy Institute writes:

This year, the pro-abortion candidate carried every state in what Maggie Gallagher calls the “Decadent Catholic Corridor” — the Northeast and the older parts of the Midwest. Too many Catholics there are still voting the way their grandparents did, and because that’s what their grandparents did. This tribal voting has been described by some bishops as immoral; it is certainly stupid, and it must be challenged by adult education. That includes effective use of the pulpit to unsettle settled patterns of mindlessness.

I don’t want to intrude on the debate over whether you’re a bad Catholic if you vote for a pro-choice candidate. But I need to note a factual error. Obama won not primarily because Catholics reflexively vote Democratic but rather because millions of Cathoilcs who had been voting Republican switched to the Democrats this time.
What’s more, this was not driven only by “cafeteria Catholics” or those with a tenuous grasp of Catholic teaching: Barack Obama won 47% of Catholics who attend mass weekly compared to 43% who voted for John Kerry.
It seems to me that, from a Catholic perspective, one of the central questions from this election was why did so many of the most religious Catholics disregard their Bishops?



Previous Posts

Good Bye
Today is my last day at Beliefnet (which I co-founded in 1999). The swirling emotions: sadness, relief, love, humility, pride, anxiety. But mostly deep, deep gratitude. How many people get to come up with an idea and have rich people invest money to make it a reality? How many people get to create

posted 8:37:24am Nov. 20, 2009 | read full post »

"Steven Waldman Named To Lead Commission Effort on Future of Media In a Changing Technological Landscape" (FCC Press Release)
STEVEN WALDMAN NAMED TO LEAD COMMISSION EFFORT ON FUTURE OF MEDIA IN A CHANGING TECHNOLOGICAL LANDSCAPE FCC chairman Julius Genachowski announced today the appointment of Steven Waldman, a highly respected internet entrepreneur and journalist, to lead an agency-wide initiative to assess the state o

posted 11:46:42am Oct. 29, 2009 | read full post »

My Big News
Dear Readers, This is the most difficult (and surreal) post I've had to write. I'm leaving Beliefnet, the company I co-founded in 1999. In mid November, I'll be stepping down as President and Editor in Chief to lead a project on the future of the media for the Federal Communications Commission, the

posted 1:10:11pm Oct. 28, 2009 | read full post »

"Beliefnet Co-Founder and Editor-in-Chief Steps Down to Lead FCC Future of the Media Initiative" (Beliefnet Press Release)
October 28, 2009 BELIEFNET CO-FOUNDER AND EDITOR-IN-CHIEF STEPS DOWN TO LEAD FCC FUTURE OF THE MEDIA INITIATIVE New York, NY - October 28, 2009 - Beliefnet, the leading online community for inspiration and faith, announced today that Steven Waldman, co-founder, president and editor-in-chief, will re

posted 1:05:43pm Oct. 28, 2009 | read full post »

Secularizing the Cross (Christian Activists: Be Careful What You Wish For)
The Supreme Court heard oral arguments this week, in Buono v. Salazar, about whether a white 6 1/2 foot cross can be displayed in a national park as a tribute to World War I soldiers. Though it's depicted as a classic clash of the secular and the religious, it actually illustrates why Christian act

posted 1:15:51pm Oct. 08, 2009 | read full post »

Advertisement
Comments read comments(15)
post a comment
hootie1fan

posted November 25, 2008 at 3:01 pm


For Catholics, pro-life is not solely defined by abortion. It makes no sense to support only anti-abortion candidate when they are so wrong on every other pro-life issue.
—————-
Especially when those candidates use the abortion issue to gain votes and lose all interest once in office. Well at least until the next election cyle…….



report abuse
 

David W.

posted November 25, 2008 at 3:14 pm


Because their pocketbooks are more important than the issue of life.



report abuse
 

Bill

posted November 25, 2008 at 3:30 pm


Steve, you make quite a leap in your final question when you said “disregard their Bishops”. These “religious Catholics” as you call them, might not have “disregarded” their bishops, but in fact listened to them and then respectfully disagreed.
I would assume that a “religious” Catholics is one who prays for his bishop, respectfully listens to him, and learns from him. It is certainly possible that an individual bishop might make a mistake while he is teaching, in which case one could legitimately disagree. But if a “religious Catholic” is going to go down the path of disagreeing with his bishop, he had better make quite certain that he knows what the Church teaches — and then prays for his bishop to teach what the Church teaches.



report abuse
 

Steven Waldman

posted November 25, 2008 at 3:55 pm


Bill, that’s a fair point. I originally “ignored” but then changed it because of the very point you made. I’d hoped that ‘disregard’ could include those who listened but decided to go a different way



report abuse
 

James

posted November 25, 2008 at 3:57 pm


This pro-life Catholic, who voted for Obama, said to the Republican Party: Fool me once, shame on you. Fool me twice, shame on me. Fool me Three Times??? No way, no how!



report abuse
 

Your Name

posted November 25, 2008 at 4:05 pm


I am a cradle catholic. Stopped going to church when I was a teenager and could say I’m not going anymore. I grew up in the south and the church was segregated. This was a big issue to me as an older child and teenager. One of our parish priests was an bad alcoholic and caused scandal. Over the years, I’ve become a Buddhist, a Bahai, and a Lutheran. But now, I am drawn back to the church. It’s about the Mass, the intellectual heritage, monasticism and the ritual. I could not find that satisfaction elsewhere. I disagree with the church hierarchy on some isssues, I don’t really follow the bishops pronouncements. I live my faith from the heart and the mind. As one philosophical entertainer (Alan Watts, and british born Episopal priest from the 60′s)said. America fought a revolution to become an independent, democratic nation. And yet we supposedly long to die and go to heaven, where we will be back in a monarchy. So, I’m a cafeteria catholic, but the church is more than the Pope and bishops. It’s all of us. And if you look at the example of history (recently gay, pedophile, etc.) plus the inquisition etc. There is no compelling need to follow every pronouncement from the Vatican or bishops, duh, they are sometimes wrong. We are all just people trying to figure out our way in life. Even the Pope. The church is all of us. I love the Catholic church and hope that all faiths can learn to at least respect one another. By the way, I think abortion and capital punishment are wrong (sanctity of life, possibility of redemption), but we live in a secular society with a separation of church and state, as it should be. Abortion is only one of the evils in our society (human trafficing, genocide, extreme materialism that has brought our great nation to the point of collapse. We should do what we can, but only God can intervene and really change things. This is a fallen world and we do not have the capacity to save it ourselves.



report abuse
 

budcath

posted November 25, 2008 at 4:08 pm


I just posted the above comment at 4:05, but my name didn’t get on it. Crazy software.



report abuse
 

pagansister

posted November 25, 2008 at 4:21 pm


I would call those Catholics that voted for Obama, “thinking” Catholics, not “sheep” Catholics, in other words, following Benny and friends mindlessly. The thinking includes realizing that the election wasn’t about just one subject…abortion…and that they have a right as an American to vote they way they want. My guess that even some of them use (gasp) artificial birth control. I also speculate that they feel it isn’t their business to tell other women what to do with their bodies.



report abuse
 

Your Name

posted November 25, 2008 at 4:42 pm


Pagansister. I saved my wife the hassle and got a vasectomy after our second child. My wife was 40 then. I’ve studied comparative religion for the last 40 years (58 if you include my Catholic upbringing) and I have respect for most, including Pagan and Wicca. I think what’s important though is the basic, “treat others as you want to be treated”. If you stray too far from that, there’s a problem. No matter what tradition you follow, Paramahansa Yoganada said this. “There was a man who needed a well. He began digging, but when he didn’t find water after a day or so, he gave up and moved to a different location and began to dig again. He did this over and over and never found water. You should dig in one place and not give up and you will eventually find the water”. That’s not an exact quote, but almost. I’ve been the impatient well digger, so been there done that. I hate that everyone is fighting over religion. The reality is no one knows the truth (it’s faith and belief and hope) and anyone who tells you they do these days is lying.



report abuse
 

pagansister

posted November 25, 2008 at 7:19 pm


First, sorry for the double post above! It told me the scramble had expired! Guess not, went in.
Your Name at 4:42 PM 25 Nov. :
Admire your consideration for your wife…my husband did the same thing after our 2nd. What a relief! I agree with your version of what some call “the Golden Rule”. And you’re right…no one knows the truth when it comes to religion. However there are unfortunately a lot of folks who think they do!!



report abuse
 

Robert

posted November 25, 2008 at 11:22 pm


“It seems to me that, from a Catholic perspective, one of the central questions from this election was why did so many of the most religious Catholics disregard their Bishops?”
Because of the decades of disrespect their Bishops have earned for themselves. The best and brightest of Catholics are not welcome in spiritual vocations.



report abuse
 

RJohnson

posted November 26, 2008 at 11:46 am


“It seems to me that, from a Catholic perspective, one of the central questions from this election was why did so many of the most religious Catholics disregard their Bishops?”
Could it be because, for decades, the Bishops disregarded the Catholic laity who were bringing them complaints about abusive priests?



report abuse
 

john k

posted June 21, 2009 at 5:25 am


I believe most catholics just looked and heard obama and that he attended a catholic church and also that he supposedly is a catholic and believed that a good enough reason to vote for him…in my run ins with catholics there is usually very little reason that goes into there thinking involving their religion but mainly that it is just their way of life..so yes many follow blindly..



report abuse
 

Jim in Texas

posted July 30, 2009 at 11:01 pm


john k ….with catholics there is …..
I concur. I have found that to be true. Having relatives who are catholic, I find them to be that way. Blindly following like sheep.



report abuse
 

cheap custom jerseys

posted May 26, 2011 at 10:05 pm


I like it very much, thank you



report abuse
 

Post a Comment

By submitting these comments, I agree to the beliefnet.com terms of service, rules of conduct and privacy policy (the "agreements"). I understand and agree that any content I post is licensed to beliefnet.com and may be used by beliefnet.com in accordance with the agreements.

Share this story


About Beliefnet

Our mission is to help people like you find, and walk, a spiritual path that will bring comfort, hope, clarity, strength, and happiness. More about Beliefnet.

Help

Media Kit

Subscribe

Legal

Copyright © Beliefnet, Inc. and/or its licensors. All rights reserved. Use of this site is subject to Terms of Service and to our Privacy Policy. Constructed by Beliefnet.

Advertisement

Report as Inappropriate

You are reporting this content because it violates the Terms of Service.

All reported content is logged for investigation.