One of the great unwritten stories of the Bush years is why religious leaders remained so quiet on torture. Most conservative Christian leaders were mum. Rick Warren, a.k.a. America's Pastor, did make a statement against torture a couple of years...
A religious conservative being selectively outraged?? Couldn't be. If there were an anti torture constituency then Warren and other Christian leaders would have been all over it.
jim
December 16, 2008 9:12 PM
Well said, td. That there isn't an anti-torture constituency is a terrible indictment of the United States as it is today.
BobN
December 16, 2008 9:32 PM
No anti-torture constituency? Sure there is!
Of course, they're not in his pews.
jim martin
December 17, 2008 3:06 AM
Excellent questions Mr. Waldman!
It is about time that people of faith begin to force church leaders to take a stand on all issues with leadership (both Democrats and Republicans) or remain silent on all of these issues.
Gene
December 17, 2008 9:22 AM
http://everydayordinary.blogspot.com
Rick Warren sounds kind of pathetic here.
theod
December 17, 2008 10:14 AM
Typical inability of a religious leader with something to lose (access, influence, members) completely unable to speak Truth to Power. He clearly had plenty of opportunities to bring it up. He's just another celebrity who is a moral fraud and will be the last to admit it.
Don
December 17, 2008 11:27 AM
It's time we tossed the whole lot overboard. Rich People, Politicians, Pastors of Mega Churches, TV Experts, Pundits, Media collaborators and anyone whole continues to make excuses and do their bidding. We the people of the United States continue to elect and support a group of egomaniacs totally unsuitable and incompetent to provide leadership at a time of global peril. Rick Warren is just another one in a long line of dishonest attention seeking media hounds who hides behind his title of Pastor. He claims he's not a policy person. He's fully immersed in policy. That's what the faith based initiatives were all about. Getting religious people involved in policy. Now that there's an issue that requires actual critique of the government, he decides he doesn't know anything about policy. Please stop providing a forum for Rick Warren and his like until they come clean about their real agendas.
truthynesslover
December 17, 2008 1:41 PM
What moral failures and frauds!But dont forget keep that money comming!
Ross S. Heckmann
December 17, 2008 4:38 PM
Of course there should be "soul-searching going on among religious conservatives on this issue -- especially now that it's become clear that the administration they supporpted authorized, layed the groundwork for, and in some cases, directly encouraged torture?" I just read in Jerome's commentary on Isaiah 6 that the reason that the prophet Isaiah did not see a vision of the Lord until the year that King Uzziah died, and that Isaiah regarded himself as a man of unclean lips, living in the midst of a people of unclean lips, is that they cowardly failed to denounce the impiety of King Uzziah. Isaiah repented, went forward as a true prophet of God, and paid the ultimate price by being martyered (he was sawn in two). How many of us guilty bystanders are willing to do the same?
Julie
December 17, 2008 10:42 PM
I believe everyone has a duty to speak out against torture, wars based on lies that killed thousands of innocent people.
Rev Wright spoke out about Bush's Iraq war. The media used the few second clips to say Wright was anti-American. I doubt many ever listened to the entire sermon.
I have heard James Dobson approve of Bush's unjust war that was against the teachings of Christ.
All religious people should have spoken out against the war
Serginho
January 13, 2009 2:15 PM
I would like to think that Warren was being sincere when he said that he was 'totally against torture'.
But his actions lead me to believe otherwise.
From the beginning, the so called "war on terror" had a decidedly anti-Muslim bent, and because of this, evangelicals not only tolerated, but tacitly approved said war, including some of its excesses. After all, some of Pres. Duh's phraseology, e.g. "axis of evil", "evildoers", "Operation Infinite Justice"(the original name of the Afghanistan war) wasn't exactly intended to rally the secular community, was it?
Not only that, but the evangelicals worked actively to secure Duh's reelection in 2004 notwithstanding the fact that torture allegations had already surfaced.
There will be no soul-searching as Mr. Waldman suggests, because anyone who condones torture, regardless of the reason, has no soul to search. Such people have already sold their soul for earthly ends.
Post a Comment
By submitting these comments, I agree to the beliefnet.com terms of service, rules of conduct and privacy policy (the "agreements"). I understand and agree that any content I post is licensed to beliefnet.com and may be used by beliefnet.com in accordance with the agreements.
A religious conservative being selectively outraged?? Couldn't be. If there were an anti torture constituency then Warren and other Christian leaders would have been all over it.
Well said, td. That there isn't an anti-torture constituency is a terrible indictment of the United States as it is today.
No anti-torture constituency? Sure there is!
Of course, they're not in his pews.
Excellent questions Mr. Waldman!
It is about time that people of faith begin to force church leaders to take a stand on all issues with leadership (both Democrats and Republicans) or remain silent on all of these issues.
Rick Warren sounds kind of pathetic here.
Typical inability of a religious leader with something to lose (access, influence, members) completely unable to speak Truth to Power. He clearly had plenty of opportunities to bring it up. He's just another celebrity who is a moral fraud and will be the last to admit it.
It's time we tossed the whole lot overboard. Rich People, Politicians, Pastors of Mega Churches, TV Experts, Pundits, Media collaborators and anyone whole continues to make excuses and do their bidding. We the people of the United States continue to elect and support a group of egomaniacs totally unsuitable and incompetent to provide leadership at a time of global peril. Rick Warren is just another one in a long line of dishonest attention seeking media hounds who hides behind his title of Pastor. He claims he's not a policy person. He's fully immersed in policy. That's what the faith based initiatives were all about. Getting religious people involved in policy. Now that there's an issue that requires actual critique of the government, he decides he doesn't know anything about policy. Please stop providing a forum for Rick Warren and his like until they come clean about their real agendas.
What moral failures and frauds!But dont forget keep that money comming!
Of course there should be "soul-searching going on among religious conservatives on this issue -- especially now that it's become clear that the administration they supporpted authorized, layed the groundwork for, and in some cases, directly encouraged torture?" I just read in Jerome's commentary on Isaiah 6 that the reason that the prophet Isaiah did not see a vision of the Lord until the year that King Uzziah died, and that Isaiah regarded himself as a man of unclean lips, living in the midst of a people of unclean lips, is that they cowardly failed to denounce the impiety of King Uzziah. Isaiah repented, went forward as a true prophet of God, and paid the ultimate price by being martyered (he was sawn in two). How many of us guilty bystanders are willing to do the same?
I believe everyone has a duty to speak out against torture, wars based on lies that killed thousands of innocent people.
Rev Wright spoke out about Bush's Iraq war. The media used the few second clips to say Wright was anti-American. I doubt many ever listened to the entire sermon.
I have heard James Dobson approve of Bush's unjust war that was against the teachings of Christ.
All religious people should have spoken out against the war
I would like to think that Warren was being sincere when he said that he was 'totally against torture'.
But his actions lead me to believe otherwise.
From the beginning, the so called "war on terror" had a decidedly anti-Muslim bent, and because of this, evangelicals not only tolerated, but tacitly approved said war, including some of its excesses. After all, some of Pres. Duh's phraseology, e.g. "axis of evil", "evildoers", "Operation Infinite Justice"(the original name of the Afghanistan war) wasn't exactly intended to rally the secular community, was it?
Not only that, but the evangelicals worked actively to secure Duh's reelection in 2004 notwithstanding the fact that torture allegations had already surfaced.
There will be no soul-searching as Mr. Waldman suggests, because anyone who condones torture, regardless of the reason, has no soul to search. Such people have already sold their soul for earthly ends.
Post a Comment
By submitting these comments, I agree to the beliefnet.com terms of service, rules of conduct and privacy policy (the "agreements"). I understand and agree that any content I post is licensed to beliefnet.com and may be used by beliefnet.com in accordance with the agreements.