Steven Waldman

Steven Waldman

“Good for the Nation’s Soul”? Religious Liberals Wrestle with the Rick Warren Decision

posted by swaldman | 2:15pm Friday December 19, 2008

Over at Progressive Revival, there’s some fascinating (and wise) disagreement breaking out over the Rick Warren selection:
Marianne Williamson is sharply critical:

“The person who leads the nation in prayer on January 20th should be someone asking God to forgive us our sins, not someone who dresses up one of our baser national instincts in pseudo-religious packaging.”

Brian McLaren, a liberal evangelical who’se taken his lumps from his conservative brethren, refers to Warren, Rich Cizik and Obama as “ideologically homeless:”

“As we near Christmas, let’s remember that the one whose birthday we’re celebrating was homeless, wandered around, couldn’t be tamed or contained by conventional categories, accepted and extended invitations to the wrong people, and had a boatload of critics.”

And, most interestingly, Diana Butler Bass describes this as a spiritual challenge:

“I don’t really want to pray with Rick Warren. But being the post-partisan progressive pilgrim that I am, I am willing to accept President-elect Obama’s challenge that it may be good for the nation’s soul if I–if we–do. It is a much better option than casting those with whom we disagree into the darkness. We’ve had too much of that in the last eight years.”

UDPATE: And this powerful statement from Renita Weems:

Rick Warren’s smiling, right wing, socially conservative, anti-gay, anti-women’s rights biblical preaching has been deemed to be not as divisive as the blistering prophetic denunciations of American imperalism by his former pastor Jeremiah Wright. Reaching out to Warren reaps more political capital for Obama than does reaching out to Wright. The pro-gay rights man whose fiery preaching nurtured Obama into becoming the community organizer he is at heart remains a pariah, banished from the inaugural platform and the American public. The man whose anti-gay message is overshadowed by the fact that he represents the face of millions of conservative voters gets to pray for the country.



Previous Posts

Good Bye
Today is my last day at Beliefnet (which I co-founded in 1999). The swirling emotions: sadness, relief, love, humility, pride, anxiety. But mostly deep, deep gratitude. How many people get to come up with an idea and have rich people invest money to make it a reality? How many people get to create

posted 8:37:24am Nov. 20, 2009 | read full post »

"Steven Waldman Named To Lead Commission Effort on Future of Media In a Changing Technological Landscape" (FCC Press Release)
STEVEN WALDMAN NAMED TO LEAD COMMISSION EFFORT ON FUTURE OF MEDIA IN A CHANGING TECHNOLOGICAL LANDSCAPE FCC chairman Julius Genachowski announced today the appointment of Steven Waldman, a highly respected internet entrepreneur and journalist, to lead an agency-wide initiative to assess the state o

posted 11:46:42am Oct. 29, 2009 | read full post »

My Big News
Dear Readers, This is the most difficult (and surreal) post I've had to write. I'm leaving Beliefnet, the company I co-founded in 1999. In mid November, I'll be stepping down as President and Editor in Chief to lead a project on the future of the media for the Federal Communications Commission, the

posted 1:10:11pm Oct. 28, 2009 | read full post »

"Beliefnet Co-Founder and Editor-in-Chief Steps Down to Lead FCC Future of the Media Initiative" (Beliefnet Press Release)
October 28, 2009 BELIEFNET CO-FOUNDER AND EDITOR-IN-CHIEF STEPS DOWN TO LEAD FCC FUTURE OF THE MEDIA INITIATIVE New York, NY - October 28, 2009 - Beliefnet, the leading online community for inspiration and faith, announced today that Steven Waldman, co-founder, president and editor-in-chief, will re

posted 1:05:43pm Oct. 28, 2009 | read full post »

Secularizing the Cross (Christian Activists: Be Careful What You Wish For)
The Supreme Court heard oral arguments this week, in Buono v. Salazar, about whether a white 6 1/2 foot cross can be displayed in a national park as a tribute to World War I soldiers. Though it's depicted as a classic clash of the secular and the religious, it actually illustrates why Christian act

posted 1:15:51pm Oct. 08, 2009 | read full post »

Advertisement
Comments read comments(12)
post a comment
Your Name

posted December 19, 2008 at 5:48 pm


I think it is a little more than disagreeing with Warren. He has disparaged and insulted the GLBT, and their Mothers, Fathers, Sisters, Brothers, Aunts, Uncles, Cousins, Grandparents, and friends. Any one who would hurt so many families does not come and stand on the “citizens porch”, and give a prayer. He should apologize to all the people he has hurt over all his years, and then pray. If he doesn’t, what good are his prayers in the benediction?



report abuse
 

Steve Real

posted December 19, 2008 at 5:52 pm


They’re Only Jews Anyways
Who cares if Rick Warren is a member of the NAZI party?
What’s it matter to you?
They are only Jews anyways…
Do you know what I mean?
We’re racially superior to them
and I doubt that all this “Adolf talk” will amount to anything anyways…
I see no reason why Barack Obama should worry about the Jews.
The Jews only make up a fraction of the population
and I think it’s about time to put them in their rightful place.
There’s only one solution to Rick Warren’s “Jewish Problem”
and that’s the final solution.



report abuse
 

Henrietta22

posted December 19, 2008 at 5:53 pm


Forgot, again.



report abuse
 

Husband

posted December 19, 2008 at 6:26 pm


Sam, it doesn’t matter if the Bible is “God’s word” or not when it comes to secular laws governing civil marriage. Not in a land that ‘promises’ freedom of religion to all citizens. We don’t have to believe what you believe to be treated equally before the law.
“we are able to believe this way and still love gay people.
Sorry Sam, but comparing gay marriage to pedophilia is not loving – far from it. It’s a vile, hateful lie – aka, the bearing of false witness about God’s gay and lesbian chldren – aka, a sin.
“In fact, we are not the hate-mongers that people have made us out to be.”
I disagree. Your side always makes comparisons like incest and pedophilia, not to mention “marrying a plant” (or an “orange” or a “rock” or a “bicycle” or a “child”), “worse than terrorists”, “cannibals”, “beastialists”, “necrophilacs”, “rapists”, a “cancer”, “Satan’s minons”, Sons of Molech”.
Literally, ALL of these things have been said, continue to be said, are allowed/encouraged to be said on many blogs, even right here on Beliefnet (much to its eternal shame).
These are NOT ‘loving’ things, Sam. They are hateful lies. They are un-charitable untruths, spread to vilify, diminish, demean, debase and denigrate gay American citizens. If they aren’t perfect examples of hate-mongering, I do not know what is.
“We just believe marriage has a certain definition, and we are trying to protect it.”
You seem to be wanting to “protect” a definition and seem to care little about the actual institution of marriage itself. Christ said divorce was not to be permitted, yet you allow it.
If you want to “protect” marriage, go “protect” it from Britney Spears and her type of 55-hour “marriage”. Go “protect” it from Darva Conger and Rick Rockwell who turned marriage into a TV game show prize. Go “protect” it from Mickey Rooney and his eight “marriages”. Go “protect” it from drunks in Las Vegas who get “married” to a stranger (albeit still legally) on a whim.
I would assure you (but it seems your side can’t be assured) that marriage is not under attack from committed, loving, human (awful that we have to even bother to include that on this site), consenting, adult, same-sex couples.



report abuse
 

Kevin

posted December 19, 2008 at 7:56 pm


Here’s something Christians may not disagree on. Jesus condemns divorce. It’s a sin against God to bear false witness against one’s neighbor. Rick Warren not only bears false witness by labeling same-sex married couples as “pedophiles”, but is now one who seeks to have the State of California forcefully annul 18,000 marriages – many, if not most, of these marriages were performed in a religious ceremony as a covenant before God. Not only has Warren and his self-identified “Christian” cohorts committed grave sins against God, but they revel in the fact that they are able to hurt families and persecute lesbian and gay Christians in the name of Christ. God makes the rain fall on the just and unjust alike, and we are to pray for and love our enemies. But the gravity with which Warren and his ilk has sullied the name of God must be considered by all true followers of Jesus. Those who do not speak out against this evil or who excuse the sins of Warren, will be judged by God as if they themselves had committed the sins. I pray that God has mercy on them.



report abuse
 

Marie Burns

posted December 19, 2008 at 8:25 pm


Jesus sat down with sinners and Pharisees — and he condemned them. He didn’t put them on pedestals, and he certainly didn’t do it at the expense of the faithful. Obama is no Jesus. He has raised up the Pharisee and trampled the believers. Shame on him.
The Constant Weader at http://www.RealityChex.com



report abuse
 

non-metaphysical stephen

posted December 19, 2008 at 10:02 pm


Perhaps we need to keep a God’s-eye view on this. After all, as much as we may disagree with Warren on this issue, he is still part of the same Kingdom of God that we belong to. There is room in God’s kingdom for all the reactions we are having to this issue. And none of this has derailed Christ from his reconciling work here on earth. Let’s not let it derail us either.



report abuse
 

Your Name

posted December 20, 2008 at 1:36 pm


President-Elect Obama is delivering on a promise: inclusion.
Inclusion is not limited to those with whom we agree, it is inclusive of us all. I am not gay and I am not a fundamentalist Christian, but welcome to them both.
And, inclusion accomplishes a most critical societal task of enabling dialogue, discussion and change. Obama can accelerate this natural, cultural and social evolution by focusing attention and creating “teachable moments.”
A long time ago, I stood up for equal rights for blacks. And, at the same time, I was not comfortable with interracial dating or marriage (I was just a teenager.) In the dialogue that was opened in the 1960s, I experienced my own “teachable moments” and evolved to my present view that the more everyone intermarries, the better for us all. “… content of character, not color…” and so forth.
With gay people, I have been experiencing a similar evolution, mostly at the proding of my kids. I presume to say that we all are moving in the right direction, equality, though such cultural and social changes sometimes seem to be glacial in their pace.
Obama’s inclusion of Rick Warren and those who follow Warren is a good step in the right direction. Inclusion and focus will bring inevitable progress.



report abuse
 

Your Name

posted December 27, 2008 at 5:47 pm


I fail to see what all the uproar is about. Christianity, Islam and Judaism says about the same thing about homosexual practice. I understand the point of view of those who do not believe in God; but from those who call themselves Christians, specifically the clergy, how do you interpret the scriptures pertaining to homosexuality and why? I would like to have where you are coming from as it pertains to scripture included with your opinion. This pertains to preachers and teachers. And to Renita Weems, sometimes it is the tone of the speech that detracts from the message.



report abuse
 

Whitney

posted January 1, 2009 at 10:31 pm


I personally don’t see what the big deal is. If I’m not mistaken, it is up to Obama to choose exactly who he wants to perform his inauguration. Frankly, as someone who is both pro-choice and pro-gay marriage, I don’t understand why these groups are wasting precious energy worrying about some pastor! Does the pro-choice community not realize that Bush has just made it legal for pro-life health practitioners not to provide information to pregnant women about abortion? Not only that, but they can extend the definition of abortion to include birth control – and refuse to distribute it or even refer a patient to someone who can provide them with birth control! Does the pro-gay marriage community not realize that there are people trying to annull legal gay marriages in California? And we’re worried about some pastor we don’t agree with? Obama ran on the premise of uniting America. His pick shouldn’t shock anyone.
There are bigger things to worry about than who Obama chooses to do his inauguration. Just sayin’.



report abuse
 

Your Name

posted January 5, 2009 at 4:58 pm


After all the smoke clears you either hold to what scripture says about homosexual behavior or you reject it and take guidance from your own moral compass.
Just remember “A human heart is more dishonest than anything else. It can’t be healed. Who can understand it?
Where is your moral compass?



report abuse
 

Carol Monroe

posted January 19, 2009 at 12:04 am


Hey, I personally think that Pastor Rick Warren is the greatest choice of spritual blessing that anyone could pick. I went to his church for years and have the highest respect for his wisdom, his fellowship and his relationship to God.



report abuse
 

Post a Comment

By submitting these comments, I agree to the beliefnet.com terms of service, rules of conduct and privacy policy (the "agreements"). I understand and agree that any content I post is licensed to beliefnet.com and may be used by beliefnet.com in accordance with the agreements.

Share this story


About Beliefnet

Our mission is to help people like you find, and walk, a spiritual path that will bring comfort, hope, clarity, strength, and happiness. More about Beliefnet.

Help

Media Kit

Subscribe

Legal

Copyright © Beliefnet, Inc. and/or its licensors. All rights reserved. Use of this site is subject to Terms of Service and to our Privacy Policy. Constructed by Beliefnet.

Advertisement

Report as Inappropriate

You are reporting this content because it violates the Terms of Service.

All reported content is logged for investigation.