Steven Waldman

Inaugural Prayers Through History -- The Ultimate Archive

Monday January 12, 2009

Here are the texts of invocations and benedictions at presidential inaugurals since 1937 when the practice began. I'm still searching for the full texts for some of the earlier ones, and will update this space as I get them. 2005...
Advertisement
Comments
rc
January 13, 2009 8:46 AM

Prayer should be a private conversation between a person and God, not a public test of faith. Government should be a secular institute that takes its directives from the people not from a single particular theology.

Richard S. Gilbert
January 13, 2009 3:26 PM

I confess to opposing the use of prayer at presidential inaugurations in the first place. It was Jesus of Nazareth who suggested people go into their "closets" and pray in private. Public prayer, of course, is appropriate in church, synagogue, mosque and in other houses of worship. However, I recognize it has become part of our "civil religion" and no words of mine will change that. All I would ask is that those who pray recognize the religious diversity of this "congregation" and not use religious formulations that may offend others. There are more varieties of religion than Christian, Jew, Muslim, Hindu, etc. etc., including those of no faith. Why do clergy think they have the right to invoke sectarian prayers in public occasions of state? I find that insensitive.

Your Name
January 13, 2009 8:01 PM

Obviously, President Elect Obama has no issue with prayer being made at his inauguration. According to another article I read the new president will be sworn in with the same Bible that President Lincoln was sworn in with; very cool. So if President Elect Obama believes in the God of the Bible, as he has professed, then it his God that should be prayed to by men who have the same beliefs. Not to be an offense to others with different beliefs but because it is in harmony with his personal faith and convictions. No man is bound to believe the same, for each of us has been given this liberty as proclaimed in our Declaration of Independence according to the endowment of our Creator. Yet, persons of different persuasion seek to quench the liberty of voicing one's faith publically, even the President of the USA, why? It burdens no citizen, it binds no stranger, nor does it clash with the history of our country's young life and the men who have served in the office of the presidency. None have been ordered to bow to the God & Savior that our new president believes in, so why do some find reason to complain? You do not have to agree with the prayer anymore than you do with my words. It is self evident that God has given you the liberty.
Prayer is private but also public. Jesus in fact prayed publicly himself. As for other words of Jesus, it was he that also said, "I am the way, the truth and the life, no one comes to the Father but by me."

B. Ybarra
January 14, 2009 4:56 PM

I wrote the last post but failed to leave my name.

Your Name
January 17, 2009 1:13 AM

Just because a Christian denomination is not Roman Catholic, doesn't automatically make it Protestant. You repeatedly make this mistake. The United Church of Christ is not Protestant, neither is Saddleback, nor are Southern Baptists. Lutherans are Protestant. Evangelicals are not. If you don't care, I guess it doesn't matter, like calling everyone West of California "Oriental". Do you do that?

Sesquiculus
January 18, 2009 2:10 PM

Inaugural prayers have been (and still are) a colossal waste of time and effort that clergy could have spent more productively. All the prayer in the world would not have made Richard Nixon into an honest man, dissuaded Bill Clinton from lechery, or endowed George W. Bush with even minimal aptitude for the presidency. If, indeed, there IS a God who listens to these windbags I'm surprised that He hasn't loosed a few well-aimed thunderbolts at their lecterns.

Your Name
January 19, 2009 2:06 PM

Why did the president-elect only appear AFTER Bishop Robinson's prayer? This should be a time of such inspiration and joy, considering all that needs doing. Obama has thrown us under the bus and it hurts.

Grupetti
January 22, 2009 3:23 AM

Your Name wrote:

"Just because a Christian denomination is not Roman Catholic, doesn't automatically make it Protestant."

That is correct...there are several varieties of Orthodox churches. But you continue with your own repeated mistakes. Everything else you stated is absolutely false. The United Church of Christ, Southern Baptists (of which Saddleback is a member congregation), and all Evangelicals are all Protestants. So are Methodists and Episcopalians - they are pretty closely related, in case you didn't know. You have been misinformed. Or uninformed.

Grupetti
January 22, 2009 3:41 AM

Oops...forgot the Coptics. Christian...NOT Protestant.

Allie
January 22, 2009 9:47 PM

Um, actually, by their definition evangelicals are Protestant... Yes... anything that isn't Catholic IS protestant. Catholic means universal. When Luther led the reformation it was against that "universal" church. If you are not part of that church, then you are part of the protest, and are thus Protestant. Read your church history.

Your Name
January 22, 2009 9:50 PM

That's because the Coptics are Catholic. They are Eastern Rite (the Roman's are Western Rite) but are still Catholic.

Linda Tokar
February 1, 2009 5:19 PM

Hi!
What an incredible work of research you've done here. I did the same project in December... and quickly realized what I"m sure you've found... it hadn't really been done and published in any findable way. This is Awesome. I sure wish your site had been up in December... it would have saved me tons of time. :-) Once clarification. The 1985 inauguration actually took place in two pieces. The first inauguration was a small practically private swearing in indoors because of frigid weather. The second piece of the inauguration was a make-up event where President Reagan repeated his oath of office for the public. That is the event where all the prayers were offered. The first event is quoted in the newspaper as being barely 2 minutes in length and it is called "his inauguration". I guess it's the difference between getting married at the justice of the peace and then doing a make-up ceremony for people to feel like they're a part of it. Thanks again for compiling this incredible body of research.

Blessings to you!!

Post a Comment

By submitting these comments, I agree to the beliefnet.com terms of service, rules of conduct and privacy policy (the "agreements"). I understand and agree that any content I post is licensed to beliefnet.com and may be used by beliefnet.com in accordance with the agreements.



Please type the text you see in the box below to verify your post and help us prevent spam. You have a limited time to type - you may wish to compose your comment in a separate document and paste it here upon completion.

Type the characters you see in the picture above.

Advertisement

Search This Blog

feed icon Subscribe

RSS Feed

Receive updates from Steven Waldman

Calendar

Advertisement

Advertisement


About Beliefnet

Our mission is to help people like you find, and walk, a spiritual path that will bring comfort, hope, clarity, strength, and happiness. More about Beliefnet.

Legal

Copyright © Beliefnet, Inc. and/or its licensors. All rights reserved. Use of this site is subject to Terms of Service and to our Privacy Policy. Constructed by Beliefnet.

Advertisement

Report as Inappropriate

You are reporting this content because it violates the Terms of Service.

All reported content is logged for investigation.