Roughly 127,977, babies are killed each year through the process of in vitro fertilization -- at least if one accepts the definition that discarding a fertilized embryo amounts to abortion and murder. Pro-choice groups obviously don't see it that way....
I think the Vatican is a bit behind the times when it comes to IVF. Fertility specialists are much more responsible now when it comes to the number of embryos created than they were previously - partially because of increased success rates in creating sustainable embryos.
The Vatican also ignores what it doesn't know -- how many naturally conceived embryos are non-viable and naturally miscarried. In any given act of intercourse, a fertile woman has about a 25% chance of live birth. In comparison to my own experience this is about accurate. Of the 11 eggs removed, 8 fertilized, and 3 made it past the 5 day mark. 2 of which will be born in May and the third will be implanted in late 2011. 3 of 11 is a little more than 25%.
rollo1
January 2, 2009 4:09 PM
I think this article is fair, because it exposes the text of ''Dignitas Personae'' in a clear way, at least for people who have already read it.
I feel that this is good on the part of Beliefnet, because many of its articles relating to the Church are written by ''lapsed Catholics'', people that have left the Church, or who have almost no sympathy for it, or who don't really know her.
Charles Cosimano
January 2, 2009 6:08 PM
It seems that finding new battles to lose is a tradition in the Vatican.
Bill
January 2, 2009 6:39 PM
I would like to echo rollo1's comment and thank Mr. Waldman for his accurate post on this topic, and for posting the full text of the Vatican's document.
Gerard Nadal
January 3, 2009 10:50 AM
A note to Danielle. The Vatican ignores nothing, and is well aware of the natural rate of miscarried babies. Scientists such as myself (molecular biologist) are in regular communication with priests and bishops.
More to your point, there is all the difference in the world between a natural ending to a human life-such as a miscarriage-and a technician winnowing a group of embryos for those deemed most desirable, and killing the rest. I believe something similar was tried with humans deemed 'unfit' in Germany in the middle of the last century.
Then, there is the erosion of human dignity in IVF when children are no longer begotten by a married couple in a lover's embrace, but manufactured by technicians, as the parents are relegated to the status of sideline observer during the manufacturing process.
Our dignity exists on a continuum. We compartmentalize it at our own peril. Thirty years from today, many now in favor of IVF will see how forward looking the Vatican has been.
Mike
January 3, 2009 11:21 AM
I am a reproductive endocrinologist (fertility specialist). I perform IVF. Couples who have IVF are INFERTILE, and are usually desparate to have a child. These are not people having a cosmetic procedure on a whim, because it's trendy or fashionable. They have desparately tried to have children by natural means, the way nature intended. But it has not worked...in fact, it may have created much emotional discord in their lives, marriages, etc. In other words, IVF is a last resort. Patients often feel robbed of a god-given right to bear children...something that can be so easily accomplished by any careless teenager who doesn't want pregnancy. It hurts them at the core of their being, and is a very personal and often embarrassing problem for them to deal with. I would encourage some of you to put yourselves in their shoes before you pass any judgement...you might be surprised at the choices you would find yourself making.
IVF embryos grow and develop in the laboratory, and approximately 50% of them (at least) are genetically abnormal and never correctly develop. These would most likely not result in a viable pregnancy if implanted into the woman. Usually, they do not even result in pregnancy. Another factor is a woman's age...which also decreases the likelihood of pregnancy. Therefore, we save all embryos that we reasonably think will have a chance, and give every couple as many chances as possible. In addition, there is incredible care and attention given to embryos. There is respect for their disposition...if for no other reason, because they are so important to the couples who own them...but hopefully for higher reasons as well.
There is so much "dogma" surrounding sexuality and reproduction in our society...everyone is afraid to frankly discuss it or experience it. It is such a taboo for so many people. What a terrible shame! I am Catholic, and i respect the Catholic Church's positiion, but i frankly think that what is most important is to help the couples who experience infertility and show them compassion...as Jesus would do. In the bible there is the account of Abraham being promised that his infertile wife would bear children and his ofspring would be as numerous as the stars. Unfortunately, we do not have the luxury of God coming out of the clouds and directly promising anyone such a thing. In our times, we are given the technology of IVF...and like all things, it is a creation that God has given us, just as God has given us all things. As for our infertile couples, I'm sorry, but brushing them off with a bunch of rules and regulations, and threatening them with eternal damnation is just cruel in my opinion. And it comes from a group of men and women who "swore off" reproducing to be holy men and women. I can't see these holy people ever being able to place themselves in the shoes of an infertile couple.
Sharon
January 3, 2009 11:42 AM
No one is being judgmental for those desiring IVF ... just educating those who ignore God's laws (i.e., Thou Shalt Not Kill). Thirty-five years ago, I was ignorant of the fact that "life begins at conception." Now that (good) science has proven this fact of life ... IVF could possibily be another "deadly sin." PS: Don't shoot the messenger, please.
LoveAll
January 3, 2009 1:14 PM
Scientifically IVF embryo is fully human and alive. Thus, the moral question is: "Under what condition is it morally right to take the life of another human being?" Is it morally right to defend the lives of self or others when a terrorist is in the process of killing you? Is it morally right to take the life of others simply because another human being inconvenience you or simply to fulfill your emotional desire?
I know infertile couples who chose adoption as the last resort and others who chose to dedicate their lives to humanity as the last resort. Adoption is a compassionate option as it reduces the problem of unwanted babies. Dedicating self to the betterment of the world is also a compassionate action.
Do couples who undergo abortion or IVF understand that an embyo a living human being? Studies have shown that women with unwanted pregnancies often cancel the abortion once they see their embryo using sonogram.
May we all make the right choice based on sufficient truth?
Mike
January 3, 2009 10:04 PM
Well, it's a good thing there such righteous people as yourselves on this earth. Maybe you can come to my clinic sometime and console some of my patients by telling them your truth. Or better yet, maybe you could witness their joy and gratitude when the process works. I suppose once they've adopted, maybe they should stop having sexual relations too, since it is only good for procreation and they can't procreate.
Mike
January 3, 2009 11:28 PM
My apologies for the sarcasm of that last post.
I have IVF children, and love them with all my heart. I went through all of the decisions personally that couples make when deciding upon IVF. I went through all the guilt imposed by church, and also by people like yourselves who believe that your right and wrong is the only solution. In the end, i listened to my heart. Because no one else can know my life experience the way i do.
I have found in my life that sometimes the "rule book" does not work, as there are just no morally good outcomes for some situations. I think, in this case, one must follow their heart and "to thine own self be true", realizing that God loves us no matter what we do.
Let's give you an example: Let's assume you marry someone, then afterward you discover that they have a sexual dysfunction that makes them unable to have phsyical intimacy. In fact, they refuse to seek help, and it leads to bitter feelings, frustration, and damages your marriage. Such feelings, which are not loving feelings, could be considered sinful. You could choose to live the rest of your life as a married, bitter, celibate individual. For those who say that sexuality and intimacy are not important, or "tough it out", or "pray to the lord for guidance", i suspect you will still be bitter. You could obtain an annullment (a church-condoned divorce)which would potentially publicly embarrass your spouse. It would also send a message that they are only loved on the condition that they have sexual function. You could also decide to have an extramarital affair or obtain a divorce. Both of these would be considered sinful. For this individual, there are no good choices.
My point is: no one else can appreciate your experience of your life...and therefore, no one else should set YOUR RULES for YOUR LIFE. You should make your own decisions about your life instead of refusing to think for yourself and deferring to rules handed down by men in pointy hats, because they do not know or understand your experience, no matter how much they/believe they have the authority to do so.
I think that organized religions basically divide people by saying "i'm right and you're wrong"..."i'm better than you are because i live by the rules (most of the time) and you don't"..."i will pray for you, and you'll see the light (that i am right)". These are the same attitudes Jesus criticized in the Pharisees and scribes. Remember, Jesus himself went against the grain of his society by criticizing the rules of his religion (Judaism). I am of the opinion that this is a lesson from Jesus that should be applied in modern times too...that sometimes our organized religions can also be like scribes and pharisees.
Just my 2 cents...
Bob
January 4, 2009 9:29 AM
but i frankly think that what is most important is to help the couples who experience infertility and show them compassion...
Yes, but the point it, that this act of compassion toward the couple is an act of murder regarding the embryos (according to the RCC). You're saying think of the couple's emotional suffering. The Church is saying think of the innocent children who are dying.
Bob
January 4, 2009 9:38 AM
"Jesus himself went against the grain of his society by criticizing the rules of his religion (Judaism)."
No, he didn't criticize Mosaic Law, he criticized the hypocritical way in which it was being carried out. Pharisees paying tribute to God with their lips and their rituals, but without any true devotion, without any charity toward their neighbors.
Remember, Jesus said He came to fulfill the Law, not erase it. That Law that He came to fulfill includes "Thou Shall Not Kill".
Your Name
January 4, 2009 10:50 AM
It seems that the people who have been "officially" designated as the end-all-be-all decision-makers of society have continued their long and tired tradition of dictating how people will carry out their personal lives--all under the premise that a "person" exists within a embryonic cell. Indeed, the act of love that produces our children is a cherished moment in our lives. But, would not the ability for couples who are infertile to produce their children through IVF also be considered an "act of love"? I would think so. I would remind people of the role that the Church has played concerning the battle between science and superstitition. It was believed by some people many years ago that to fight a disease was actually against God's will. And yet, the medical breakthroughs of today have proven how vital our scientific understanding of the human body is to prolonging and improving our lives. This same type of scientific understanding of the human body is now improving the lives of those people who are not able to have children. What right does the Church and its pious followers have to take this opportunity away from innocent people; and furthermore, to accuss them of murder? This is a most pompous misuse of authority and religious influence ever to strike humanity. Many years from now, religious leaders who accept this out-dated and draconian viewpoint will be judged for their arrogance and abuse. With that point, I believe IVF offers a wonderful opportunity for couples who desire to have children.
Mike
January 4, 2009 1:37 PM
With all due respect to the Catholic Church, the Pope, and Christians around the world. I think everyone should do whatever gives them peace in their hearts. If the rules of the Church do this...great! If those rules do so for the posters on this IVF topic who believe IVF is murder...great!
Maybe we could spin this a different way...cigarette smokers and alcohol users are murderers too. They are slowly poisoning their systems with toxins that are PROVEN to cause illness and disease. Second hand smoke causes just as much illness as smoking yourself. Alcohol causes liver disease and hypertension. How about overeating and obesity...i wonder how many believers that IVF is murder are Obese, drink alcohol regularly, or smoke? Well, you are slowly murdering yourselves (and possibly others) with these habits...you are just doing it over 25 years rather than in an instant, as with suicide. But you probably will never nit-pick over those habits, if you enjoy alcohol, tobacco, and overeating.
I am only commenting that church laws do not give peace to all people (even many Catholics) who are following these laws due to fear in their hearts. God gives us all free will to live our lives. God also loves us beyond measure. However, what good is free will if we are not free to employ it? How can there be free will that comes with a price of damnation if we don't choose the choice that "the church wants"? In other words, how free are you choices if someone is looming over you with the threat of punishment...you can either choose "God's choice" (dictated by church) or make the choice to perish in hell. That is not a choice. Although an extremem example..that would be like being a prisoner of war and being forced to make the choice of the "enemy" or be tortured. I happen to believe that God allows you to be the creater of your own life..and God wants you to make the best choices to live your life to the fullest potential to be like the creator that he is. I think we are hypocritical to think that a discarded embryo does not somehow fit into God's plan as well, and that the soul that may/may not occupy that embryo didn't itself choose this destiny at the beginning of time to fulfill it's own purpose. I'm sorry, but i just don't think that you, or i, or the Church, or the Pope, have all the answers to the deep and complex mysteries of the universe. Believe whatever you want...but if it doesn't serve you well and give you peace in your heart, it is of no service to you. For many, IVF brings about the joy of having a family when all others said it was impossible.
Larry Parker
January 4, 2009 10:02 PM
http://community.beliefnet.com/doxieman122
**It is true that not all the losses of embryos in the process of in vitro fertilization have the same relationship to the will of those involved in the procedure. But it is also true that in many cases the abandonment, destruction and loss of embryos are foreseen and willed.**
The Church seems to make a distinction here between embryos that are killed with malice and embryos that die accidentally -- as often happens immediately after intercourse (in fact, more often that in conceptions that proceed toward what we generally regard pregnancy).
But if life is life ... isn't the failed implantation of an embryo into the uterus -- let alone a miscarriage -- just as much of an "abortion" as a surgical procedure? Isn't this the reason the Church opposes abortion in cases of rape and incest? Will the Church be excommunicating faithful couples who come into a Catholic hospital reporting a miscarriage?
That's where the logical extension of the Church's standards leads to, IMO.
Katie Angel
January 5, 2009 8:35 AM
I understand the desire of couples to have children but I consider it to be very selfish to demand that those children be biologically connected to you - which is what IVF comes down to. It isn't that the couple simply wants a child/children - if that were the case then they could adopt. It is that the want a SPECIFIC child (the correct sex, the correct genes, etc) and therefore are willing to sacrifice other potential children in the process. The Church may not be able to convince people like Mike not to do it - but perhaps writings like this will at least convince us to consider what we are doing and make our choices more conscious.
Gerard Nadal
January 5, 2009 1:25 PM
It is not without full understanding of the longing married couples have for a baby, or the tragic impact of infertility on their lives that the Catholic Church bears solemn witness to universal truth.
We start with the understanding that even at the single-celled stage, that is the first stage of development of a human being. It is a stage that all of us have gone through. I say this as a Molecular Biologist. After fertilization, beginning with the single-celled stage we have a new human organism that is full and complete as such in that, and every subsequent stage of its development.
As we employ our technologies, we MUST adhere to the first principle of ethics-THE END DOES NOT JUSTIFY THE MEANS. We must use just means to achieve just ends.
The all too human and noble desire of couples for "a baby of their own" can never justify the winnowing of humans in their embryonic stage of development in the search for the most viable candidates. Some bloggers have suggested a moral equivalence between natural miscarriage and the intentional killing of humans in their embryonic stage of development. How absurd.
Finally, IVF treats these nascent humans as property. The freezing and storage of embryonic humans violates the first and most fundamental charge for parents-to facilitate the growth and development of their children. Molesting and arresting the development of those children by submersing them in liquid nitrogen until it is convenient for the parents to further their children's development shows the complete lack of understanding all involved have of human nature.
Our human nature is a shared nature. We don't all have a different human nature. The institutionalization of IVF comes complete with its manufacturing approach to humans, complete with quality control-by discarding rejects-and cold storage (as though the children were mink coats). Such an institution tears at the very fabric of our shared human nature. Therefore, the argument that this decision should only be made by the infertile and those who stand to profit from their infertility is a lie. Our human dignity, our shared human nature is at stake. Inasmuch as that nature is shared, we all have a voice in this debate.
Marc-Alain
January 6, 2009 4:03 PM
I agree with Gerald. We must use just means to achieve just ends.
I am perplexed at the divide on such an issue. It is extremely sad and troublesome.
Many people view the Church as some great evil despot that seeks to control people's minds and actions. That is unfortunate. I think the Church (among others) can be a great source of guidance and wisdom on extremely complex moral issues. After all, these matters are what they discern and deliberate continuously.
Has the Church made mistakes in the past? Of course. Have there and are there bad people within the organization? For sure. Is there any organization within the history of man without such corruption? No. Not unless they were aliens.
The Church is supposed to proclaim the good news and message of Jesus Christ. Some people feel that when the ugliness of humanity surfaces from within the Church (i.e. priest scandal), it is a license to discredit the entire institution. Not so. If a son is born to a father who commits murder, is the son subject to the same destiny? Of course not. Many people believe that George W. Bush is a terrible person. Does this mean that America is terrible? That would be absurd.
One does not have to be a Christian to recognize that given two choices, one is ultimately better, as is the case here. I had a friend who was raised in the south and was brought up to dispise blacks. He said to me that one night, as a teenager, he spent some time in prayer meditating racism. At age 15, he was able to conclude by himself that racism was wrong. I feel that most people can reach the same conclusion (truth) for themselves if only they give themselves a chance.
Regardless of what the media tells us, our lives are not just about us as individuals. Life is not about self indulgence. We have an obligation to protect the environment for future generations. We must fight to champion equality among men. We must sacrifice ourselves so that we benefit as a planet and as a race.
When I contemplate these very serious issues, I imagine two separate Earths existing at the same time with the same components independent of one another. As they are set in motion, which one will depict a more favorable picture of humanity over time? Which planet will last longer, be happier, more peaceful, more prosperous and more glorious? The Earth whose inhabitants seek to feed one another or the Earth whose people strive to feed themselves as individuals?
There is always a better choice and there is always one truth.
Post a Comment
By submitting these comments, I agree to the beliefnet.com terms of service, rules of conduct and privacy policy (the "agreements"). I understand and agree that any content I post is licensed to beliefnet.com and may be used by beliefnet.com in accordance with the agreements.
I think the Vatican is a bit behind the times when it comes to IVF. Fertility specialists are much more responsible now when it comes to the number of embryos created than they were previously - partially because of increased success rates in creating sustainable embryos.
The Vatican also ignores what it doesn't know -- how many naturally conceived embryos are non-viable and naturally miscarried. In any given act of intercourse, a fertile woman has about a 25% chance of live birth. In comparison to my own experience this is about accurate. Of the 11 eggs removed, 8 fertilized, and 3 made it past the 5 day mark. 2 of which will be born in May and the third will be implanted in late 2011. 3 of 11 is a little more than 25%.
I think this article is fair, because it exposes the text of ''Dignitas Personae'' in a clear way, at least for people who have already read it.
I feel that this is good on the part of Beliefnet, because many of its articles relating to the Church are written by ''lapsed Catholics'', people that have left the Church, or who have almost no sympathy for it, or who don't really know her.
It seems that finding new battles to lose is a tradition in the Vatican.
I would like to echo rollo1's comment and thank Mr. Waldman for his accurate post on this topic, and for posting the full text of the Vatican's document.
A note to Danielle. The Vatican ignores nothing, and is well aware of the natural rate of miscarried babies. Scientists such as myself (molecular biologist) are in regular communication with priests and bishops.
More to your point, there is all the difference in the world between a natural ending to a human life-such as a miscarriage-and a technician winnowing a group of embryos for those deemed most desirable, and killing the rest. I believe something similar was tried with humans deemed 'unfit' in Germany in the middle of the last century.
Then, there is the erosion of human dignity in IVF when children are no longer begotten by a married couple in a lover's embrace, but manufactured by technicians, as the parents are relegated to the status of sideline observer during the manufacturing process.
Our dignity exists on a continuum. We compartmentalize it at our own peril. Thirty years from today, many now in favor of IVF will see how forward looking the Vatican has been.
I am a reproductive endocrinologist (fertility specialist). I perform IVF. Couples who have IVF are INFERTILE, and are usually desparate to have a child. These are not people having a cosmetic procedure on a whim, because it's trendy or fashionable. They have desparately tried to have children by natural means, the way nature intended. But it has not worked...in fact, it may have created much emotional discord in their lives, marriages, etc. In other words, IVF is a last resort. Patients often feel robbed of a god-given right to bear children...something that can be so easily accomplished by any careless teenager who doesn't want pregnancy. It hurts them at the core of their being, and is a very personal and often embarrassing problem for them to deal with. I would encourage some of you to put yourselves in their shoes before you pass any judgement...you might be surprised at the choices you would find yourself making.
IVF embryos grow and develop in the laboratory, and approximately 50% of them (at least) are genetically abnormal and never correctly develop. These would most likely not result in a viable pregnancy if implanted into the woman. Usually, they do not even result in pregnancy. Another factor is a woman's age...which also decreases the likelihood of pregnancy. Therefore, we save all embryos that we reasonably think will have a chance, and give every couple as many chances as possible. In addition, there is incredible care and attention given to embryos. There is respect for their disposition...if for no other reason, because they are so important to the couples who own them...but hopefully for higher reasons as well.
There is so much "dogma" surrounding sexuality and reproduction in our society...everyone is afraid to frankly discuss it or experience it. It is such a taboo for so many people. What a terrible shame! I am Catholic, and i respect the Catholic Church's positiion, but i frankly think that what is most important is to help the couples who experience infertility and show them compassion...as Jesus would do. In the bible there is the account of Abraham being promised that his infertile wife would bear children and his ofspring would be as numerous as the stars. Unfortunately, we do not have the luxury of God coming out of the clouds and directly promising anyone such a thing. In our times, we are given the technology of IVF...and like all things, it is a creation that God has given us, just as God has given us all things. As for our infertile couples, I'm sorry, but brushing them off with a bunch of rules and regulations, and threatening them with eternal damnation is just cruel in my opinion. And it comes from a group of men and women who "swore off" reproducing to be holy men and women. I can't see these holy people ever being able to place themselves in the shoes of an infertile couple.
No one is being judgmental for those desiring IVF ... just educating those who ignore God's laws (i.e., Thou Shalt Not Kill). Thirty-five years ago, I was ignorant of the fact that "life begins at conception." Now that (good) science has proven this fact of life ... IVF could possibily be another "deadly sin." PS: Don't shoot the messenger, please.
Scientifically IVF embryo is fully human and alive. Thus, the moral question is: "Under what condition is it morally right to take the life of another human being?" Is it morally right to defend the lives of self or others when a terrorist is in the process of killing you? Is it morally right to take the life of others simply because another human being inconvenience you or simply to fulfill your emotional desire?
I know infertile couples who chose adoption as the last resort and others who chose to dedicate their lives to humanity as the last resort. Adoption is a compassionate option as it reduces the problem of unwanted babies. Dedicating self to the betterment of the world is also a compassionate action.
Do couples who undergo abortion or IVF understand that an embyo a living human being? Studies have shown that women with unwanted pregnancies often cancel the abortion once they see their embryo using sonogram.
May we all make the right choice based on sufficient truth?
Well, it's a good thing there such righteous people as yourselves on this earth. Maybe you can come to my clinic sometime and console some of my patients by telling them your truth. Or better yet, maybe you could witness their joy and gratitude when the process works. I suppose once they've adopted, maybe they should stop having sexual relations too, since it is only good for procreation and they can't procreate.
My apologies for the sarcasm of that last post.
I have IVF children, and love them with all my heart. I went through all of the decisions personally that couples make when deciding upon IVF. I went through all the guilt imposed by church, and also by people like yourselves who believe that your right and wrong is the only solution. In the end, i listened to my heart. Because no one else can know my life experience the way i do.
I have found in my life that sometimes the "rule book" does not work, as there are just no morally good outcomes for some situations. I think, in this case, one must follow their heart and "to thine own self be true", realizing that God loves us no matter what we do.
Let's give you an example: Let's assume you marry someone, then afterward you discover that they have a sexual dysfunction that makes them unable to have phsyical intimacy. In fact, they refuse to seek help, and it leads to bitter feelings, frustration, and damages your marriage. Such feelings, which are not loving feelings, could be considered sinful. You could choose to live the rest of your life as a married, bitter, celibate individual. For those who say that sexuality and intimacy are not important, or "tough it out", or "pray to the lord for guidance", i suspect you will still be bitter. You could obtain an annullment (a church-condoned divorce)which would potentially publicly embarrass your spouse. It would also send a message that they are only loved on the condition that they have sexual function. You could also decide to have an extramarital affair or obtain a divorce. Both of these would be considered sinful. For this individual, there are no good choices.
My point is: no one else can appreciate your experience of your life...and therefore, no one else should set YOUR RULES for YOUR LIFE. You should make your own decisions about your life instead of refusing to think for yourself and deferring to rules handed down by men in pointy hats, because they do not know or understand your experience, no matter how much they/believe they have the authority to do so.
I think that organized religions basically divide people by saying "i'm right and you're wrong"..."i'm better than you are because i live by the rules (most of the time) and you don't"..."i will pray for you, and you'll see the light (that i am right)". These are the same attitudes Jesus criticized in the Pharisees and scribes. Remember, Jesus himself went against the grain of his society by criticizing the rules of his religion (Judaism). I am of the opinion that this is a lesson from Jesus that should be applied in modern times too...that sometimes our organized religions can also be like scribes and pharisees.
Just my 2 cents...
but i frankly think that what is most important is to help the couples who experience infertility and show them compassion...
Yes, but the point it, that this act of compassion toward the couple is an act of murder regarding the embryos (according to the RCC). You're saying think of the couple's emotional suffering. The Church is saying think of the innocent children who are dying.
"Jesus himself went against the grain of his society by criticizing the rules of his religion (Judaism)."
No, he didn't criticize Mosaic Law, he criticized the hypocritical way in which it was being carried out. Pharisees paying tribute to God with their lips and their rituals, but without any true devotion, without any charity toward their neighbors.
Remember, Jesus said He came to fulfill the Law, not erase it. That Law that He came to fulfill includes "Thou Shall Not Kill".
It seems that the people who have been "officially" designated as the end-all-be-all decision-makers of society have continued their long and tired tradition of dictating how people will carry out their personal lives--all under the premise that a "person" exists within a embryonic cell. Indeed, the act of love that produces our children is a cherished moment in our lives. But, would not the ability for couples who are infertile to produce their children through IVF also be considered an "act of love"? I would think so. I would remind people of the role that the Church has played concerning the battle between science and superstitition. It was believed by some people many years ago that to fight a disease was actually against God's will. And yet, the medical breakthroughs of today have proven how vital our scientific understanding of the human body is to prolonging and improving our lives. This same type of scientific understanding of the human body is now improving the lives of those people who are not able to have children. What right does the Church and its pious followers have to take this opportunity away from innocent people; and furthermore, to accuss them of murder? This is a most pompous misuse of authority and religious influence ever to strike humanity. Many years from now, religious leaders who accept this out-dated and draconian viewpoint will be judged for their arrogance and abuse. With that point, I believe IVF offers a wonderful opportunity for couples who desire to have children.
With all due respect to the Catholic Church, the Pope, and Christians around the world. I think everyone should do whatever gives them peace in their hearts. If the rules of the Church do this...great! If those rules do so for the posters on this IVF topic who believe IVF is murder...great!
Maybe we could spin this a different way...cigarette smokers and alcohol users are murderers too. They are slowly poisoning their systems with toxins that are PROVEN to cause illness and disease. Second hand smoke causes just as much illness as smoking yourself. Alcohol causes liver disease and hypertension. How about overeating and obesity...i wonder how many believers that IVF is murder are Obese, drink alcohol regularly, or smoke? Well, you are slowly murdering yourselves (and possibly others) with these habits...you are just doing it over 25 years rather than in an instant, as with suicide. But you probably will never nit-pick over those habits, if you enjoy alcohol, tobacco, and overeating.
I am only commenting that church laws do not give peace to all people (even many Catholics) who are following these laws due to fear in their hearts. God gives us all free will to live our lives. God also loves us beyond measure. However, what good is free will if we are not free to employ it? How can there be free will that comes with a price of damnation if we don't choose the choice that "the church wants"? In other words, how free are you choices if someone is looming over you with the threat of punishment...you can either choose "God's choice" (dictated by church) or make the choice to perish in hell. That is not a choice. Although an extremem example..that would be like being a prisoner of war and being forced to make the choice of the "enemy" or be tortured. I happen to believe that God allows you to be the creater of your own life..and God wants you to make the best choices to live your life to the fullest potential to be like the creator that he is. I think we are hypocritical to think that a discarded embryo does not somehow fit into God's plan as well, and that the soul that may/may not occupy that embryo didn't itself choose this destiny at the beginning of time to fulfill it's own purpose. I'm sorry, but i just don't think that you, or i, or the Church, or the Pope, have all the answers to the deep and complex mysteries of the universe. Believe whatever you want...but if it doesn't serve you well and give you peace in your heart, it is of no service to you. For many, IVF brings about the joy of having a family when all others said it was impossible.
**It is true that not all the losses of embryos in the process of in vitro fertilization have the same relationship to the will of those involved in the procedure. But it is also true that in many cases the abandonment, destruction and loss of embryos are foreseen and willed.**
The Church seems to make a distinction here between embryos that are killed with malice and embryos that die accidentally -- as often happens immediately after intercourse (in fact, more often that in conceptions that proceed toward what we generally regard pregnancy).
But if life is life ... isn't the failed implantation of an embryo into the uterus -- let alone a miscarriage -- just as much of an "abortion" as a surgical procedure? Isn't this the reason the Church opposes abortion in cases of rape and incest? Will the Church be excommunicating faithful couples who come into a Catholic hospital reporting a miscarriage?
That's where the logical extension of the Church's standards leads to, IMO.
I understand the desire of couples to have children but I consider it to be very selfish to demand that those children be biologically connected to you - which is what IVF comes down to. It isn't that the couple simply wants a child/children - if that were the case then they could adopt. It is that the want a SPECIFIC child (the correct sex, the correct genes, etc) and therefore are willing to sacrifice other potential children in the process. The Church may not be able to convince people like Mike not to do it - but perhaps writings like this will at least convince us to consider what we are doing and make our choices more conscious.
It is not without full understanding of the longing married couples have for a baby, or the tragic impact of infertility on their lives that the Catholic Church bears solemn witness to universal truth.
We start with the understanding that even at the single-celled stage, that is the first stage of development of a human being. It is a stage that all of us have gone through. I say this as a Molecular Biologist. After fertilization, beginning with the single-celled stage we have a new human organism that is full and complete as such in that, and every subsequent stage of its development.
As we employ our technologies, we MUST adhere to the first principle of ethics-THE END DOES NOT JUSTIFY THE MEANS. We must use just means to achieve just ends.
The all too human and noble desire of couples for "a baby of their own" can never justify the winnowing of humans in their embryonic stage of development in the search for the most viable candidates. Some bloggers have suggested a moral equivalence between natural miscarriage and the intentional killing of humans in their embryonic stage of development. How absurd.
Finally, IVF treats these nascent humans as property. The freezing and storage of embryonic humans violates the first and most fundamental charge for parents-to facilitate the growth and development of their children. Molesting and arresting the development of those children by submersing them in liquid nitrogen until it is convenient for the parents to further their children's development shows the complete lack of understanding all involved have of human nature.
Our human nature is a shared nature. We don't all have a different human nature. The institutionalization of IVF comes complete with its manufacturing approach to humans, complete with quality control-by discarding rejects-and cold storage (as though the children were mink coats). Such an institution tears at the very fabric of our shared human nature. Therefore, the argument that this decision should only be made by the infertile and those who stand to profit from their infertility is a lie. Our human dignity, our shared human nature is at stake. Inasmuch as that nature is shared, we all have a voice in this debate.
I agree with Gerald. We must use just means to achieve just ends.
I am perplexed at the divide on such an issue. It is extremely sad and troublesome.
Many people view the Church as some great evil despot that seeks to control people's minds and actions. That is unfortunate. I think the Church (among others) can be a great source of guidance and wisdom on extremely complex moral issues. After all, these matters are what they discern and deliberate continuously.
Has the Church made mistakes in the past? Of course. Have there and are there bad people within the organization? For sure. Is there any organization within the history of man without such corruption? No. Not unless they were aliens.
The Church is supposed to proclaim the good news and message of Jesus Christ. Some people feel that when the ugliness of humanity surfaces from within the Church (i.e. priest scandal), it is a license to discredit the entire institution. Not so. If a son is born to a father who commits murder, is the son subject to the same destiny? Of course not. Many people believe that George W. Bush is a terrible person. Does this mean that America is terrible? That would be absurd.
One does not have to be a Christian to recognize that given two choices, one is ultimately better, as is the case here. I had a friend who was raised in the south and was brought up to dispise blacks. He said to me that one night, as a teenager, he spent some time in prayer meditating racism. At age 15, he was able to conclude by himself that racism was wrong. I feel that most people can reach the same conclusion (truth) for themselves if only they give themselves a chance.
Regardless of what the media tells us, our lives are not just about us as individuals. Life is not about self indulgence. We have an obligation to protect the environment for future generations. We must fight to champion equality among men. We must sacrifice ourselves so that we benefit as a planet and as a race.
When I contemplate these very serious issues, I imagine two separate Earths existing at the same time with the same components independent of one another. As they are set in motion, which one will depict a more favorable picture of humanity over time? Which planet will last longer, be happier, more peaceful, more prosperous and more glorious? The Earth whose inhabitants seek to feed one another or the Earth whose people strive to feed themselves as individuals?
There is always a better choice and there is always one truth.
Post a Comment
By submitting these comments, I agree to the beliefnet.com terms of service, rules of conduct and privacy policy (the "agreements"). I understand and agree that any content I post is licensed to beliefnet.com and may be used by beliefnet.com in accordance with the agreements.