Steven Waldman

Steven Waldman

Torturing The Guilty vs. Abusing the Innocent

posted by swaldman

Most attention these days has focused on revelations that administration officials sanctioned torture for “high value” Al Qaeda operatives.
That’s important but another moral issue is as crucial, and in some ways more morally clear-cut: As part of the war on terror, the U.S. government routinely detained people for years without knowing if they were guilty of anything.
Lawrence Wilkerson, Colin Powell’s former chief of staff, explained that American officials embraced a view that if they gathered up enough people, and kept them around long enough, some were bound to have some useful information: “as many people as possible had to be kept in detention for as long as possible to allow this philosophy of intelligence gathering to work. The detainees’ innocence was inconsequential.”
Please ponder that line from a very high level Bush administration insider: “the detainees’ innocence was inconsequential.”
According to a report by several human rights groups, “of the more than 770 individuals known to
have been incarcerated for some period at Guantánamo, the U.S. government has charged only 23 with war crimes as of October 2008.”
In other words, 97% of people detained — sometimes for years, sometimes under cruel conditions — were not deemed to have done anything wrong.
If there’s going to be an investigation, it should be as much about figuring out how someone’s innocence became “inconsequential.”



Previous Posts

More Blogs To Enjoy!
Thank you for visiting this page. This blog is no longer being updated. Please enjoy the archives. Here are some other blogs you may also enjoy: Top Religious News Most Recent Inspiration Post Happy Reading!

posted 6:00:22pm Apr. 20, 2012 | read full post »

Good Bye
Today is my last day at Beliefnet (which I co-founded in 1999). The swirling emotions: sadness, relief, love, humility, pride, anxiety. But mostly deep, deep gratitude. How many people get to come up with an idea and have rich people invest money to make it a reality? How many people get to create

posted 8:37:24am Nov. 20, 2009 | read full post »

"Steven Waldman Named To Lead Commission Effort on Future of Media In a Changing Technological Landscape" (FCC Press Release)
STEVEN WALDMAN NAMED TO LEAD COMMISSION EFFORT ON FUTURE OF MEDIA IN A CHANGING TECHNOLOGICAL LANDSCAPE FCC chairman Julius Genachowski announced today the appointment of Steven Waldman, a highly respected internet entrepreneur and journalist, to lead an agency-wide initiative to assess the state o

posted 11:46:42am Oct. 29, 2009 | read full post »

My Big News
Dear Readers, This is the most difficult (and surreal) post I've had to write. I'm leaving Beliefnet, the company I co-founded in 1999. In mid November, I'll be stepping down as President and Editor in Chief to lead a project on the future of the media for the Federal Communications Commission, the

posted 1:10:11pm Oct. 28, 2009 | read full post »

"Beliefnet Co-Founder and Editor-in-Chief Steps Down to Lead FCC Future of the Media Initiative" (Beliefnet Press Release)
October 28, 2009 BELIEFNET CO-FOUNDER AND EDITOR-IN-CHIEF STEPS DOWN TO LEAD FCC FUTURE OF THE MEDIA INITIATIVE New York, NY - October 28, 2009 - Beliefnet, the leading online community for inspiration and faith, announced today that Steven Waldman, co-founder, president and editor-in-chief, will re

posted 1:05:43pm Oct. 28, 2009 | read full post »

Advertisement
Comments read comments(2)
post a comment
Marian

posted April 24, 2009 at 6:11 pm


I’m afraid that’s the law enforcement mentality gone amok. All too many cops and prosecutors believe that, (1) if you can’t be sure of convicting the right person, the next best thing is to convict the right KIND OF person, and (2) if the person you’re prosecuting isn’t guilty of what you’re prosecuting him for, he has probably gotten away with something just as bad. It’s a kind of statistical analysis of criminal law. Ultimately, it will result in a Bayesian formulation: if 86% of all criminal defendants, then it’s okay to convict ALL defendants and cut the maximum sentence by 14%.



report abuse
 

Marian

posted April 24, 2009 at 6:12 pm


Sorry, that should be “if 86% of all criminal defendants are guilty, then…etc.”



report abuse
 

Post a Comment

By submitting these comments, I agree to the beliefnet.com terms of service, rules of conduct and privacy policy (the "agreements"). I understand and agree that any content I post is licensed to beliefnet.com and may be used by beliefnet.com in accordance with the agreements.

Share this story


About Beliefnet

Our mission is to help people like you find, and walk, a spiritual path that will bring comfort, hope, clarity, strength, and happiness. More about Beliefnet.

Help

Media Kit

Subscribe

Legal

Copyright © Beliefnet, Inc. and/or its licensors. All rights reserved. Use of this site is subject to Terms of Service and to our Privacy Policy. Constructed by Beliefnet.

Advertisement

Report as Inappropriate

You are reporting this content because it violates the Terms of Service.

All reported content is logged for investigation.