RH Reality Check linked to a fascinating article on a site called "Science Notes" about the reasons for third trimester abortions. As regular readers know, I've been hunting for good stats so I was interested in the author's data about "What causes third trimester abortions?"
The author recounted a 1999 study that concluded:
- 40% of late term abortions happened because "an earlier test indicated that a defect existed but not how serious it was."
- In 37%, "an earlier test failed to find the serious defects that showed up later."
- In 18%, "a diagnosis for this kind of defect can't be made until the third trimester."
- And in 5%, "doctors or parents delayed the decision to abort."
Stunningly, all of the late term abortions seemed to have occurred due to fetal abnormalities, dramatically bolstering the case of pro-choicers that these rare procedures invariably occur because of horrifying fetal defects.
So I clicked on the footnote and looked at the original study.
It turns out the original report, conducted at Maternité Port Royal University Hospital, Paris, France, only looked at late-term abortions involving fetal abnormalities. That's right, 100% of the abortions showed defects because it was a study of fetuses with defects.
Add to Del.icio.us
Add to Technorati
Add to Digg
Add to Newsvine
Add to Facebook
Add to StumbleUpon
Subscribe
Panthera-- I'm adamantly pro-choice, but I think you attacked Dianne unfairly here. I think her main point was that it's unconscionable to have an abortion at 8 months for any reason that doesn't involve saving the mother's life, not that all rape victims should be forced to have their rapists' babies. (She may believe that, but did not state so here).
I think all people would draw a line somewhere. Despite the propaganda, pro-choicers don't believe in so called "partial birth abortion." Thinking about what cut-off for what reasons is appropriate for abortion is an important discussion.
I don't care if 100% of abortions are elective, it's my body. Mine, not yours and God help the person who tries to take it over.
Good Morning Panthera,
I know we disagree on this one, but I don't think Diane and Emily are the hate-filled pseudo-christians that you've had such difficulty with. You know that many genuine Christians are motivated by love; love of the baby, the mother and of motherhood, which has suffered terribly under abortion.
Among the fetal 'defects' involved in late term abortions is Down Syndrome. 90% of these babies are aborted at all stages of pregnancy. They don't deserve death. Even those relatives, whose developmental disabilities you've shared with me in the past have had great purpose here on earth. You and your husband have done much to work out your salvation by your extraordinary financial and emotional generosity and support. And if the developmentally disabled person's only purpose on earth is to call forth the better angels of our nature and aid us in our salvation, then ought they not be regarded more as angels?
We won't know God's purposes until we meet Him face to face. But I shudder to think how many people have short-circuited those Divine plans along the way through abortion. How many people who would have found cures to dread diseases, or served as peacemakers who could have prevented future wars and conflicts have had those promising lives cut short by abortion? Again, we'll never know until we meet God face to face.
I would love to use my skills as a molecular biologist to look for genetic markers for autism. What holds me back is the certain knowledge that my work would ultimately be perverted and used to screen autistic babies and mark them for abortion. My autistic son has been a light in the darkness of many lives and has made his little corner of the world a better place to be. How many Joseph's will be cut down before birth in the not-too-distant future? The disability resides not in the developmentally challenged child, but in the inability of the parent to see the possibilities for that life, or even the desire to try. In the end, abortion has eroded us the pillars of western civilization by catering to narcissism and fear.
My best to you and your husband.
God Bless.
Emily,
The problem I have with Dianne's comment is that she made accusations about Dr. Tiller that were already dealt with in court and were found to be false. I have no idea what ad she was referring to, but I cannot rely on her statements based on the other comments she had made that are not reliable.
Maybe if more women kept there legs closed and stayed off there backs, you wouldnt have to worry so much about it being "your body". Also, at 8 months that should be murder. Only SELFISH people would KILL a child because he or she has "defects" they cant deal with. Grow up people. If you dont want to have babies, dont have sex. Or maybe some condoms teamed up with birthcontrol could help.
Post a Comment
By submitting these comments, I agree to the beliefnet.com terms of service, rules of conduct and privacy policy (the "agreements"). I understand and agree that any content I post is licensed to beliefnet.com and may be used by beliefnet.com in accordance with the agreements.