Steven Waldman

Steven Waldman

Iran Coverage — Social Media vs. MSM

posted by swaldman | 12:44pm Sunday June 14, 2009

Last night, I was trying to find out information about the horrifying situation and in Iran. I turned to CNN which had Larry King interviewing bikers. MSNBC had a documentary about prisons. FoxNews had the Huckabee show, talking about credit cards.
Then I went to HuffingtonPost, TalkingPointsmemo.com and AndrewSullivan, all of whom had real-time YouTube videos from the protests, Twitter-based reporting, pictures posted on Facebook, great analysis. All of that led to some crowing by the bloggers that the Iran debacle shows the bankruptcy of mainstream media.
To me, though, if you look at the whole picture,, we’re seeing the best of both styles of media. Look through this excellent compilation put together by Huffington Post and note the important contributions of The Wall Street Journal, The New York Times, CNN, BBC, Newsweek, Channel 4 of England, and other mainstream media outlets — most of it accessible on the internet. They’re using their own reporters and, increasingly, themselves using photos and videos from Iranian citizens. That combines with an extraordinary flow of user generated content, tweets, and independent bloggers, including some in iran.
If we can figure out how to tap into the best of both media forms, we’ll enter a golden age of journalism rather than the dark ages.



Previous Posts

Good Bye
Today is my last day at Beliefnet (which I co-founded in 1999). The swirling emotions: sadness, relief, love, humility, pride, anxiety. But mostly deep, deep gratitude. How many people get to come up with an idea and have rich people invest money to make it a reality? How many people get to create

posted 8:37:24am Nov. 20, 2009 | read full post »

"Steven Waldman Named To Lead Commission Effort on Future of Media In a Changing Technological Landscape" (FCC Press Release)
STEVEN WALDMAN NAMED TO LEAD COMMISSION EFFORT ON FUTURE OF MEDIA IN A CHANGING TECHNOLOGICAL LANDSCAPE FCC chairman Julius Genachowski announced today the appointment of Steven Waldman, a highly respected internet entrepreneur and journalist, to lead an agency-wide initiative to assess the state o

posted 11:46:42am Oct. 29, 2009 | read full post »

My Big News
Dear Readers, This is the most difficult (and surreal) post I've had to write. I'm leaving Beliefnet, the company I co-founded in 1999. In mid November, I'll be stepping down as President and Editor in Chief to lead a project on the future of the media for the Federal Communications Commission, the

posted 1:10:11pm Oct. 28, 2009 | read full post »

"Beliefnet Co-Founder and Editor-in-Chief Steps Down to Lead FCC Future of the Media Initiative" (Beliefnet Press Release)
October 28, 2009 BELIEFNET CO-FOUNDER AND EDITOR-IN-CHIEF STEPS DOWN TO LEAD FCC FUTURE OF THE MEDIA INITIATIVE New York, NY - October 28, 2009 - Beliefnet, the leading online community for inspiration and faith, announced today that Steven Waldman, co-founder, president and editor-in-chief, will re

posted 1:05:43pm Oct. 28, 2009 | read full post »

Secularizing the Cross (Christian Activists: Be Careful What You Wish For)
The Supreme Court heard oral arguments this week, in Buono v. Salazar, about whether a white 6 1/2 foot cross can be displayed in a national park as a tribute to World War I soldiers. Though it's depicted as a classic clash of the secular and the religious, it actually illustrates why Christian act

posted 1:15:51pm Oct. 08, 2009 | read full post »

Advertisement
Comments read comments(5)
post a comment
Markus

posted June 14, 2009 at 2:54 pm


“If we can figure out how to tap into the best of both media forms, we’ll enter a golden age of journalism rather than the dark ages.” That’s correct! As long as the rules of journalism will be enforced and misinformation will be eliminated.



report abuse
 

Emanera

posted June 14, 2009 at 5:21 pm

Aziz

posted June 15, 2009 at 1:56 am


I just created an aggregate of some of these new media feeds off twitter – follow @iranrevolution (or even better, see the real-time stream at http://friendfeed.com/iranrevolution)



report abuse
 

Julie

posted June 15, 2009 at 3:48 am


The HuffingtonPost frequently updated blog is great.
I am very angered by several Republicans and Joe Lieberman making public statements that Obama should be calling out Iran for a fraudulent election. There is no concrete evidence of fraud. Indianan Republican Rep. Mike Pence urged President Obama to speak out in favor of the forces of reform in the Middle Eastern country.
Lieberman issued a statement urging Obama and others to “speak out, loudly and clearly, about what is happening in Iran right now and unambiguously express their solidarity with the brave Iranians who went to the polls in the hope of change and who are now looking to the outside world for strength and support.” Lieberman follows McCain’s warmonger positions.
I think Mitt Romney is a complete idiot and jerk for saying on ABC’s “This Week:”
“The comments by the president last week, that there was a robust debate going on in Iran, was obviously entirely wrong-headed. What has occurred is the election is a fraud, the results are inaccurate, and you’re seeing a brutal repression of the people as they protest. … It’s very clear that the president’s policies of going around the world and apologizing for America aren’t working. … Look, just sweet talk and criticizing America is not going to enhance freedom in the world.”
Ahmadinejad would love for Obama to accuse him of fraud, which he would use to reduce Obama’s reputation with Muslims. It would give Ahmadinejad an excuse not to negotiate with the US.
I read two very interesting articles about the approach Obama would take.
Obama’s Iran Policy to Focus on Human Rights, Not Election – Administration Official Says President Will Not Drive Anti-Ahmadinejad Agenda
President Obama would offer support for human rights in Iran generally and would not back away from his diplomatic outreach to the longtime U.S. adversary, regardless of the ultimate outcome of the election. … But the administration’s [Obama] position has the support of Iranian human rights groups, which fear the clerical regime will exploit any perception of U.S. interference to slander the opposition as American puppets — a caustic charge in a nation with a deep memory of U.S. interference in its politics. … A senior Obama administration official who did not want to be identified or quoted explained that the president was deeply conscious of appearing not to favor any side in the election.
http://tinyurl.com/n6fq39
Why the White House Views Iran’s Election as a Diplomatic Coup
When Obama Administration Iran czar Dennis Ross and top U.S. Iran negotiator William Burns were planning the details of the President’s outreach to Tehran with senior European diplomats earlier this spring, they discussed a possible nightmare scenario for the June 12 presidential elections in Iran. It was not, however, the prospect that incumbent Mahmoud Ahmadinejad might win, or even that he might steal the election, as many are alleging he now has, that had them worried. Quite the opposite, it was the possibility that the provocative Iranian President might lose to a moderate challenger.
Despite all the attention paid to the office of the Iranian presidency, nuclear policy is set by the religious leaders of the country, and they have shown a determination to amass enriched uranium regardless of whether hard-liners or moderates have been President.
http://tinyurl.com/nyhv73



report abuse
 

Panthera

posted June 15, 2009 at 9:45 am


Fascinating. It is like watching 1978-9 all over again.
Never mind stopping to think or reflecting on the wisdom of not throwing gasoline onto a raging fire…or, even, not digging deeper when you’re already in a hole.
The Republicans have learned nothing.
The best thing to do right now is to pray and keep observing. With luck,we might be seeing the end of an evil-hearted era. With interference, we might just cement a fascist government into power for yet another generation.



report abuse
 

Post a Comment

By submitting these comments, I agree to the beliefnet.com terms of service, rules of conduct and privacy policy (the "agreements"). I understand and agree that any content I post is licensed to beliefnet.com and may be used by beliefnet.com in accordance with the agreements.

Share this story


About Beliefnet

Our mission is to help people like you find, and walk, a spiritual path that will bring comfort, hope, clarity, strength, and happiness. More about Beliefnet.

Help

Media Kit

Subscribe

Legal

Copyright © Beliefnet, Inc. and/or its licensors. All rights reserved. Use of this site is subject to Terms of Service and to our Privacy Policy. Constructed by Beliefnet.

Advertisement

Report as Inappropriate

You are reporting this content because it violates the Terms of Service.

All reported content is logged for investigation.