Steven Waldman

Steven Waldman

It’s The Pre-Existing Conditions, Stupid

posted by swaldman | 2:43pm Wednesday June 17, 2009

The health care discussion seems to assume that for most Americans the big issues are either lowering cost or covering the uninsured. But to me, the part of the health care system most people seem most bothered about is the common practice of denying coverage based on pre-existing condition. If you have cancer or diabetes or any other illness that’s either chronic or recurring, you are treated as a pariah by the health care system. A job loss goes from being damaging to devastating. Those most in need of insurance–the sick—are the least able to get it. It’s the most inhumane part of the system.
The biggest news of the debate so far is that the health insurers have pretty much agreed to eliminate this provision as part of a broader reform. In our focus on the issues that still divide, we should pause to reflect on that monumental development.



Previous Posts

Good Bye
Today is my last day at Beliefnet (which I co-founded in 1999). The swirling emotions: sadness, relief, love, humility, pride, anxiety. But mostly deep, deep gratitude. How many people get to come up with an idea and have rich people invest money to make it a reality? How many people get to create

posted 8:37:24am Nov. 20, 2009 | read full post »

"Steven Waldman Named To Lead Commission Effort on Future of Media In a Changing Technological Landscape" (FCC Press Release)
STEVEN WALDMAN NAMED TO LEAD COMMISSION EFFORT ON FUTURE OF MEDIA IN A CHANGING TECHNOLOGICAL LANDSCAPE FCC chairman Julius Genachowski announced today the appointment of Steven Waldman, a highly respected internet entrepreneur and journalist, to lead an agency-wide initiative to assess the state o

posted 11:46:42am Oct. 29, 2009 | read full post »

My Big News
Dear Readers, This is the most difficult (and surreal) post I've had to write. I'm leaving Beliefnet, the company I co-founded in 1999. In mid November, I'll be stepping down as President and Editor in Chief to lead a project on the future of the media for the Federal Communications Commission, the

posted 1:10:11pm Oct. 28, 2009 | read full post »

"Beliefnet Co-Founder and Editor-in-Chief Steps Down to Lead FCC Future of the Media Initiative" (Beliefnet Press Release)
October 28, 2009 BELIEFNET CO-FOUNDER AND EDITOR-IN-CHIEF STEPS DOWN TO LEAD FCC FUTURE OF THE MEDIA INITIATIVE New York, NY - October 28, 2009 - Beliefnet, the leading online community for inspiration and faith, announced today that Steven Waldman, co-founder, president and editor-in-chief, will re

posted 1:05:43pm Oct. 28, 2009 | read full post »

Secularizing the Cross (Christian Activists: Be Careful What You Wish For)
The Supreme Court heard oral arguments this week, in Buono v. Salazar, about whether a white 6 1/2 foot cross can be displayed in a national park as a tribute to World War I soldiers. Though it's depicted as a classic clash of the secular and the religious, it actually illustrates why Christian act

posted 1:15:51pm Oct. 08, 2009 | read full post »

Advertisement
Comments read comments(7)
post a comment
hootie1fan

posted June 17, 2009 at 4:50 pm


Big buiness, especially big health insurance business, is in the business of making as much $$ as they can. To that end the health insurance industry wants to sell you a policy that they will have to spend as little as possile supporting. Of course it’s in their self-interest to deny claims against anything they can.



report abuse
 

John

posted June 17, 2009 at 6:23 pm


This post got it absolutely right. For me and millions like me, the only hope right now for medical insurance is through a large group policy offered by an employer. Same goes for most life insurance, and sometimes long term care and other insurances also.
Insurance companies are indeed not in business to provide care. They are in business to lower costs and maximize profits. We’re the only industrialized western nation where entities with these interest have such influence on something that’s vital to the life and health of all citizens. In short, it’s insane.



report abuse
 

Your Name

posted June 17, 2009 at 6:23 pm


I often fantasize about what Dante would have done with the individuals who came up with the idea of denying insurance based on pre-existing conditions. Cancer for all eternity? Endless staph infections?



report abuse
 

Martin CT

posted June 17, 2009 at 9:06 pm


You have it right that it’s all about pre-existing conditions for many of us.
Even more basic, however, is the idea of insurance — pooling risk. That principle is disregarded when we allow medical underwriting — screening for pre-existing conditions and risk factors. Everyone who has been screened out (or placed in an expensive high-risk pool) will have a very negative opinion.
The flip side, of course, is that if all the “sick” people are included in the pool, rates will go up for everyone, especially the healthy and young.
The ethical necessity of this kind of “sharing the wealth” (risk) is not well accepted in this country. That’s what may sink health insurance reform.



report abuse
 

New Age Cowboy

posted June 17, 2009 at 11:43 pm


Mr. Waldman,
Here’s an interesting article with polling data:
http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/us_health_care_poll
I don’t understand why the pro-lifers aren’t raising hell over pre-existing conditions. Can’t prenatal and pregnancy issues fall under pre-existing conditions? I guess $$$ are more important to Blue Cross and Blue Shield than babies.



report abuse
 

cx

posted June 18, 2009 at 6:44 am


The health insurance companies are terrified that they’re going to lose their cash flow. As well they should – they are a stain upon a supposedly Christian nation.
However, just because they say they’ll eliminate pre-existing conditions doesn’t mean they actually will. Never underestimate the probability that corporations are lying through their spokespersons’ teeth.



report abuse
 

Patrick Abernathy

posted July 28, 2009 at 1:12 pm


It does not make business sense to insure people with pre-existing conditions. Does it make business sense for an insurer to provide coverage for a house on fire? Does it make good business sense to provide coverage to a pyromaniac? The only way insurance companies can provide full medical coverage for those with pre-existing conditions is to raise the premiums for all. This rush to provide full coverage for those with pre-existing conditions sounds very much like populist nonsense like the government mandating banks lend to people who cannot qualify for a loan. This is precisely the muddled thinking that contributed heavily to our current recession and housing slump.
Patrick



report abuse
 

Post a Comment

By submitting these comments, I agree to the beliefnet.com terms of service, rules of conduct and privacy policy (the "agreements"). I understand and agree that any content I post is licensed to beliefnet.com and may be used by beliefnet.com in accordance with the agreements.

Share this story


About Beliefnet

Our mission is to help people like you find, and walk, a spiritual path that will bring comfort, hope, clarity, strength, and happiness. More about Beliefnet.

Help

Media Kit

Subscribe

Legal

Copyright © Beliefnet, Inc. and/or its licensors. All rights reserved. Use of this site is subject to Terms of Service and to our Privacy Policy. Constructed by Beliefnet.

Advertisement

Report as Inappropriate

You are reporting this content because it violates the Terms of Service.

All reported content is logged for investigation.