After the George Tiller shooting I suggested that the Department of Homeland Security report about "right wing extremism" -- villified by conservatives -- may deserve some newfound respect. (I also questioned why on earth mainstream conservatives felt aggrieved in the first place).
Early reports are that the man who opened fire at the Holocaust Museum, James von Brunn, also was exactly the sort of person that report was warning about -- a white supremacist.
These nutcases are not mainstream conservatives. Liberals shouldn't imply they are; conservatives shouldn't defend them.

Add to Newsvine
Add to StumbleUpon
r. wainwright,
Always impressive to see a moderate Nazi posting online. Usually, Nazis are always screaming and ranting to promote their hatred. You, on the other hand, appear to be very calm and collected to try to make your hatred more palpable, I dare say?
Let's try to guess what you mean by your unsaid implications, shall we? Oh, I'll take a few random chances:
1) You think everyone is tired of hearing about the Holocaust. You probably really don't think it actually happened anyway, and if it did you really couldn't care less.
2) You like to have more "debate" and "inquiry" because you think the Holocaust is basically made up. Again, you are probably loathe to admit any of it - maybe you think a few thousand died and "that's about all".
3) You mention "war crimes" perpetrated by the Allies. I assume you mean more than Dresden, although that has probably been one of your biggest rallying cries for you and your buddies since a while. No, you want to "expose" more. My guess is that you think more declassified documents "prove" some sort of "Jewish cabal" which started a war against Hitler, or some such nonsense? They were fabricated, you say? "Must have been the Jews", I hear you thinking out loud.
So nice of you to try playing the reasonability game, little Nazi. Perhaps you'll have better luck next time.
1. At least the guards were armed and able to take down the man who has yet to be identified with any political party. Assume(ptions) make an A_ _ of U and ME. I'm deeply saddened by this guard's death. It is a stark reminder of certain factions of society that are willing to act upon their hatred. To lump this sort of person immediately in the "right winger" category worthy of DHS surveillance is nothing short of the profiling that the LEFT and the ACLU is vehemently opposed. Hello, you can't have it both ways.
2. The likely reason that the LA gangs are not targeted by DHS is that they are potential Democrat voters. Yes, I bet even gang bangers vote!! Especially for the party that is weakest on crime and everything else.
3. When will you people wake up to the the worst scenario that has ever befallen the greatest country on earth? Your president is destroying your country while you sit back and enjoy the ride in oblivious star struck awe. There will be much more of this and other hate crimes as Obama works his magic to unite this country and the rest of the world at our expense. Better buckle your seat belts because it's a rough and windy road ahead.
And there they are - Amber and r.wainwright. Defending the indefensible.
Amber, at the time your comment was posted, we already knew this man's political affiliations, his previous terrorist undertakings, his publications, and public statements.
Nobody was in doubt at the time of your posting which side of the political aisle he came from.
He was not shy about his purpose, and he made great use of modern technology to inform the world of his intent.
You simply don't want to accept it. A game you've played here before.
It works when the subject is the number of angels dancing on head's of pins. It doesn't when we have the footage of the guard being murdered in cold blood, preventing even worse.
r.wainright,
I have spoken to many Germans and Dutch who were alive during the era of 1933-1945. Many of them were and still are very much aligned with the general policies of the National Socialists. None of them, not one, denies the truth about the death camps. None of them denies the genocide committed upon the Jews. The imposed wearing of pink and yellow stars. The denunciations and subsequent summary executions of homosexuals. I personally knew a woman who was incarcerated in Dachau because of her deeply-felt Christian beliefs.
No one denies that the UK and the US let the NAZIs gain power in Germany because of a deeply held antisemitism. No one denies that the reparations demanded of Germany after WWI created an ideal breeding ground for the political extremest parties - Germany could just as easily have swung to the communists.
This has nothing to do with the fact, proved, documented, recorded that over six million Jews were murdered by the Nazis. At least 10 million people were put to death directly because of their race, ethnicity, sexual orientation or Christian beliefs. Because they suffered mental or physical impairments. Because their parents were not willing to cooperate and thus "examples" were needed.
If your motivations are those of a racial supremacist, by all means be open and honest about it. We have enough hateful people here pretending that denying gays the right to marriage is done out of "love". Instead of false witness, tell the truth.
Better yet, get thee over to crunchycon. Rod Dreher welcomes racists and white supremacists with open arms on his blog.
Holocaust or not, NO ONE has the right to go to a museum and start shooting people on sight. The old man is obviously insane and full of hatred AND would have killed children to enable his delusions. It was up to that brave Guard that saved all those he would have killed. The man lost his life and is a Hero in every sense of the word. There is too much hatred being taught in the airwaves, Rush Limbaugh comes to mind. Some feeble minds believe this caca. Shameful.
A nut is a nut and has every right to be a nut, but when you refuse to label a nut as such instead identifing them as victims, patriots, etc. you lose credibility whemn they do something nutty.
Post a Comment
By submitting these comments, I agree to the beliefnet.com terms of service, rules of conduct and privacy policy (the "agreements"). I understand and agree that any content I post is licensed to beliefnet.com and may be used by beliefnet.com in accordance with the agreements.