I’m particularly excited about a project we’re working on about niche Bibles. Our feature will be a gallery of various Bibles, but it will be supplemented with an essay by Glenn Paauw, a longtime director at the International Bible Society. Paauw is a one-of-a-kind editor, reader, listener, and general force for good in his part of the world, and for years he’s been working on a dream of his called The Books of the Bible. Paauw’s dream came to life last year when IBS released the first edition of The Books, which is a Bible without additives–no verse numbers, no chapter numbers, no footnotes or gutters or much of anything save pure text. It’s also an attempt at reordering the actual books of the Bible to reflect other possibilities of reading and experiencing the text.
Here’s an excerpt from Paauw’s forthcoming essay:
Over the last few centuries, we’ve come to believe that the key to better Bible reading is to add more and more stuff to the text. Modern Bibles are cut into two columns and laced with cross references, footnotes, section headings, commentary and all manner of what-not and hooha. We’ve split books that were originally whole and severed natural connections within big sections. Our Bibles are a complicated mess.
Bible additives like these left philosopher John Locke complaining that the scriptures “are so chop’d and minc’d, and as they are now Printed, stand so broken and divided, that . . . the Common People take the Verses usually for distinct Aphorisms,” and “even Men of more advanc’d Knowledge in reading them, lose very much of the strength and force of the Coherence, and the Light that depends on it.” In other words: we’ve adapted the Bible to the point that it’s nearly impossible to understand.
Paauw suggests that if Bible literacy is down, and it is (along with all kinds of religious literacy), then part of the blame rests on the way we’ve been publishing the Bible. An organic Bible, he claims, might encourage actual reading of the text.
I’ll let you know when we publish Paauw’s essay. I think he raises all sorts of fascinating questions about how we read the Bible, how we don’t, and how we might change.
posted October 30, 2008 at 11:52 am
What exactly is an ‘organic bible’? I’m not familiar with that phrase.
posted October 30, 2008 at 1:09 pm
I think it’s just another way of saying a Bible “without additives.” Pure text, more or less.
posted October 31, 2008 at 10:40 am
A great idea. I have seen bibles before without the silly column thing and they are much more like a real book. I’ve also seen a bible that had the books in the order they are believed to have been written in, which puts the New Testament in particular into a different light.
I have long thought that the chapters and verses are divided up in the most unlikely and liguistically strange places and serve to obscure the plain meaning of some passages. Teh sub-headings that peole have added are a dangerous addition as they are rooted in individuals’ own interpretations. This new bible sounds like a great idea – and of course, it’s not a new bible really – it’s the way it was originally given.
posted November 9, 2008 at 9:43 pm
I have greatly enjoyed reading and using the Books of the Bible, and strongly recommend that everyone indulge themselves with at least one. It is a pleasure to read, and very accessible for those who do not have a high degree of familiarity with the Bible itself.
Pingback: De-versifying the Bible essay - Text Messages