Text Messages

Text Messages

Do Ed Young’s sex sermons speak to singles?

posted by Patton Dodd | 2:19pm Tuesday November 25, 2008

The most emailed article at the New York Times right now is about Ed Young of Fellowship Church in Texas and his much-discussed sermon series on sex. As part of the series, he challenged all the married couples in his church to have sex each day for seven days. 

I have lots of questions here, but I’ll restrict myself to just one: How do singles figure into Young’s sex sermon series? In every interview clip I’ve seen, Young emphasizes that the challenge is just for married people, and the Times says Young’s advice to singles has amounted to: “I don’t know, try eating chocolate cake.”
When I was a young, unmarried Christian, “try eating chocolate cake” is not far from the vision of sexuality I was given. When I married, I discovered a host of Christian teaching on sexuality, some of it quite beautiful, profound, and pragmatic. But in the years after I became a Christian and before I married, my experiences of Christian teaching on sex were much like what I worry singles at Fellowship Church are experiencing now: Sex is for married people, and if you’re not yet old enough or fortunate enough to be married…wow, that sucks. 
Lauren Winner’s Real Sex is the only Christian book I know of that explicitly and comprehensively addresses non-marital sexuality. There, she says that Christian teaching on sexuality ought to be part of a larger vision of embodiment–whether single or married, sexually active or chaste, we ought to be learning how to be in our bodies in ways that glorify God and fully express our createdness. That’s a nice start, but I wonder what else single Christians are hearing from their ministers? Does anyone know? Is Ed Young speaking to this during his series? Is anyone speaking to it? What is the Christian vision of sexuality for singles? 
Update: I wanted to highlight this comment posted below by Al Hsu. He helpfully mentions his book on Christian singlehood as an additional resource. 

This is a symptom of a larger (evangelical) problem of overemphasizing marriage to the exclusion of singles. In the early church, it was actually considered more spiritual to be single than to be married, because marriage was seen as “worldly” and a concession to the flesh. The Protestant Reformation flipped this and said that marriage and family was normative and elevated marriage over singleness. A more biblical balance is that marriage and singleness are equal gifts and equally valid ways of living. If Christians really understood this and believed this, it would help us have more constructive things to say than “eat chocolate cake.”

(My book Singles at the Crossroads has a chapter on singleness and sexuality. Not nearly as comprehensive as Lauren Winner’s Real Sex, but I hope it’s at least somewhat helpful!)



Previous Posts

The Last Text Message
Today is my last day with Beliefnet, and my last day as the author of this blog. The Text Messages archives will remain live at this location, but posting will cease. If that sounds gloomy, it's an accurate reflection of my mind this afternoon. I've chosen to pursue new opportunities, but I'm n

posted 3:47:12pm Feb. 04, 2009 | read full post »

Quitting Church: A Q&A with Julia Duin
Why do people stop going to church? This big question is the subject of Julia Duin's small book, Quitting Church: Why teh Faithful are Fleeing and What To Do About It. Duin is not a disinterested observer of the phenomenon of church-dropping; rather, she's a churchgoer who wants churches to work wel

posted 4:03:51pm Feb. 03, 2009 | read full post »

Rob Stennett vs. Marilynne Robinson
I'm overjoyed that my good friend Rob Stennett has won the Award of Merit from Christianity Today for his novel The Almost True Story of Ryan Fisher. (Here's CT's review of the book.) Stennett's hilarious book is about a real estate agent who joins a suburban church in order to reach the Christian h

posted 2:36:44pm Jan. 30, 2009 | read full post »

What is spiritual restoration?
Slate asked for an essay on Ted Haggard's spiritual restoration. I'm okay with what I came up with for now, but the more I think about it, the more I think we need better thinking on what restoration looks like for very public, outspoken, influential men and women like Haggard:Most people who fail n

posted 9:00:56am Jan. 29, 2009 | read full post »

It's Not TV; it's Ted TV
A blog might not be the best medium for an essay like this. But I want to offer some more considered thoughts on Ted Haggard and his HBO documentary; I hope this performs some kind of service in a story that I hope will end--in its public iteration--very soon. This was written as a stand-alone essay

posted 3:57:44am Jan. 28, 2009 | read full post »

Advertisement
Comments read comments(7)
post a comment
Emily

posted November 25, 2008 at 7:13 pm


I so appreciate this post. My church does very little to address the lives of singles at all, because I think, it doesn’t really know how. Marriage is rightly honored and the roles of husbands and wives discussed regularly, but the single life is difficult to address, particularly for young adults who have not yet married. I think they are viewed with suspicion by the church, because they may be (and probably are) having sex. It takes a brave person to discuss the sexual nature of people as separate from sexual activity and marriage, but is something we Christians desperately need to do. If we wonder why young adults are not excited about church, this may be a reason.



report abuse
 

everydayjoe

posted November 25, 2008 at 9:21 pm


I waited. and waited. and waited. and exploded. not sure our social structure is conducive to the abstinence ideal. sure, messages pour in, but the hormones that are made to respond. i don’t know that there is a “christian” answer that is practical. the social consequences of disease, pregnancy, and “hard knocks” are probably a greater deterrent than religious guilt.



report abuse
 

Becky

posted November 25, 2008 at 9:52 pm


This is exactly the dilemma I encountered when I sat through a service at Mars Hill Church in Seattle – Mark Driscoll went on and on and on and and on about sexual sins and offering some rather explicit suggestions for what marrieds can do about these sins (have sex with each other a lot) but nothing for the singles except a cold shower.



report abuse
 

Al Hsu

posted November 26, 2008 at 7:54 am


This is a symptom of a larger (evangelical) problem of overemphasizing marriage to the exclusion of singles. In the early church, it was actually considered more spiritual to be single than to be married, because marriage was seen as “worldly” and a concession to the flesh. The Protestant Reformation flipped this and said that marriage and family was normative and elevated marriage over singleness. A more biblical balance is that marriage and singleness are equal gifts and equally valid ways of living. If Christians really understood this and believed this, it would help us have more constructive things to say than “eat chocolate cake.”
(My book Singles at the Crossroads has a chapter on singleness and sexuality. Not nearly as comprehensive as Lauren Winner’s Real Sex, but I hope it’s at least somewhat helpful!)



report abuse
 

Your Name

posted November 28, 2008 at 12:12 am


I can’t stand it when pastors preach on marriage or parenting during church services, as there are usually a lot of people in the congregation to whom these topics don’t apply (e.g., kids, teenagers, and never-married and divorced singles). Why couldn’t Pastor Young have held a seminar apart from the church service for those who were interested instead?
Also, Young’s advice to singles, “try eating chocolate cake,” is crass and insensitive. Given that he married at the age of 21, he obviously has no clue of what it is like to be single into one’s late 20s, 30s, etc., having to fight nature and abstain for years on end (that is, if biblical teachings on premarital sex are adhered to). Many singles shy away from attending church because it is rightly perceived as being unfriendly to singles and too marriage- and kids-focused, and this comment only fuels the perception. And come to think of it, Young’s whole sermon fueled the perception of churches’ being obsessed with married couples at the expense of singles, not just the comment he made to the New York Times.



report abuse
 

Your Name

posted February 28, 2009 at 7:35 pm


Agreed. I’m a big fan of Winner’s book. I also wanted to recommend Loves Me, Loves Me Not: The Ethics of Unrequited Love, by Laura Smit. Her focus is more on how we treat one another as people (not married people and single people, male and female, black and white) and less on sex, but it has a lot to say about the singles, non-singles, and the church, and has been very helpful to me.



report abuse
 

Your Name

posted September 9, 2009 at 10:00 pm


“Try eating chocolate cake” is a meaningless platitude, as is “singleness is a gift, equal to marriage”, as Al Hsu tries to tell us. The only way to support singles who feel left out when sermons turn to sex and marriage is not only offer its hearty endorsement, but to work together in removing the obstacles to marriage that exist in churches today — such as indifferent messages about marriage and singleness that prescribe a kind of studied indifference, as if it shouldn’t matter to you which “gift” you get, and that if you are anything less than content, well, that’s “making an idol out of marriage”. Celibacy, a la Winner, is not supposed to be a consolation prize for the unchosen, and we need not risk offending those who have chosen that path with sermons on marriage. Read Candice Watter’s articles on marriage at Boundless.com.



report abuse
 

Post a Comment

By submitting these comments, I agree to the beliefnet.com terms of service, rules of conduct and privacy policy (the "agreements"). I understand and agree that any content I post is licensed to beliefnet.com and may be used by beliefnet.com in accordance with the agreements.

Share this story


About Beliefnet

Our mission is to help people like you find, and walk, a spiritual path that will bring comfort, hope, clarity, strength, and happiness. More about Beliefnet.

Help

Media Kit

Subscribe

Legal

Copyright © Beliefnet, Inc. and/or its licensors. All rights reserved. Use of this site is subject to Terms of Service and to our Privacy Policy. Constructed by Beliefnet.

Advertisement

Report as Inappropriate

You are reporting this content because it violates the Terms of Service.

All reported content is logged for investigation.