Some of my colleagues and I have been following the discussion about how some Christians believe that (or have wondered if) Barack Obama is the Anti-Christ. While we think about putting together something on that story, in Other Anti-Christ News, the RNS reported this week on a farmer named Michael White who believes that rules restricting seed exchanges and replanting are not just bad agriculture, but a sign of the End of Days:
“The Anti-Christ will use seed to control nations and people,” White writes in the book he published in May, ‘The 666′s Are in the Seed.’ … “He will also use seed to create food shortages. Pantented seed will become the most prized possession of the Antichrist.”
I first got angry about the rules governing seed patents while reading Barbara Kingsolver’s engrossing Animal, Vegetable, Miracle. It’s a nerve-wrecking shame, and I number myself among those who are waking up to the problems of big agriculture and trying in myriad small ways to affect change.
In other words, eschatology aside, three cheers for Michael White. Read the whole RNS story after the jump.
Farmer links seed patents to the Antichrist
By KAY CAMPBELL
c. 2008 Religion News Service
DUTTON, Ala. — Michael White keeps a Mason jar full of wheat grains
next to his well-worn Bible.
The jar was filled by his great-grandfather decades before anyone
dreamed of genetically altering plants or animals. The jar reminds him
of what he considers God’s first earthly gift to humanity: seeds.
It’s a gift that is in danger of being eradicated, White says,
through increased genetic manipulation of plants, hybridization and the
patenting of genes by large corporations. God’s gift of seeds, given the
day after he separated dry land from water, according to Genesis, is not
something that should be taken away from a farmer. To forbid a farmer or
gardener from gathering his own seed to replant the next year is
something White sees as one of the signs of the end of time.
“The Antichrist will use seed to control nations and people,” White
writes in the book he published in May, “The 666′s Are in the Seed,” a
title that refers to the traditional number of the Antichrist of
Revelation. “He will also use seed to create food shortages. Patented
seed will become the most prized possession of the Antichrist.”
Like many Christians, White, who farms near Scottsboro, Ala.,
believes the years before Jesus returns to Earth will be a “time of
trouble,” filled with the chaos predicted in Matthew and Revelation:
war, famine, pestilence, plagues and a world-wide totalitarian
government. Many Christians believe a globally idolized figure, the
Antichrist, will rule the world.
White has been through his own “time of trouble” over seeds. A few
years ago he and his father were sued by Monsanto for patent violation
– it is illegal to save seed from patented plants for re-planting. At
the time of the lawsuit, he said, his retired father hadn’t farmed in
years.
The lawsuit against his 85-year-old father was dropped in the spring
of 2006, shortly before White agreed to settle out of court with
Monsanto. White will not comment on the details of that settlement. The
consent injunction and judgment in the case states that White had
planted, saved, cleaned and sold patented seed.
Who won or lost in the legal tussles he had, White says, is
immaterial. What matters is that people understand that seed patents,
non-reproducing hybrids and plants engineered to produce seeds that
terminate a germinating seedling are part of what he considers an
immoral corporate and legal control of one of God’s first gifts to
humankind.
Most seed scientists claim that genetically modified plants are the
key to future bounty. Monsanto and other agri-corporations argue that
protecting their patents through their Seed Stewardship programs enables
their scientists to make more discoveries and ultimately to benefit all.
In fact, patents “facilitate technology innovation which benefits
all farmers, including the most resource-poor,” says John Combest, an
issues manager for Monsanto, who commented about criticism of seed
patents and genetic engineering by e-mail. Monsanto, he said, is helping
to develop seeds to produce plants that tolerate drought and increase
yields. Those seeds will be licensed to the African Agriculture
Technology Foundation for distribution without royalties to farmers,
Combest wrote.
Many religious thinkers, however, have warned against the practical
and long-term effects of tinkering with a system God put into place at
creation. Statements of concern over genetic engineering and patenting
of seeds have been issued by Methodists, Presbyterians, Catholics,
Baptists, Muslims, the National Council of Churches and others.
One of the most recent was circulated by the International Catholic
Rural Association, signed by some 250 religious leaders and faith
groups, and presented to a United Nations’ meeting on food security in
June. The goal of these groups, says Jaydee Hanson, who worked on
bioethics issues for the United Methodist Church and now works at the
Center for Food Safety, is to make sure farmers are not restricted from
saving or exchanging seeds. That saving or exchanging is currently
prohibited by Trade-Related Aspects of Intellectual Property Rights.
“TRIPS … hinder farmers’ innovations,” Hanson wrote in a recent
e-mail. “Plants, seeds and genes (should be) part of creation which
cannot be claimed by intellectual property rights.”
Michael White sees a blessing in his own troubles, although, he
says, the three-year legal fight over seed patents cost him his
business, his first marriage, his health and nearly killed his father.
The shed at White’s seed-cleaning business was shuttered for four years
when his customers quit coming after they received query letters from
Monsanto’s lawyers, he said. The shed is now stacked with bags of the
foundation seed he bought from Auburn University.
These seeds, he says, are like his great-grandfather’s wheat. They
will germinate plants that produce seeds that anyone can save and
replant for the next year’s harvest.
White is now getting orders for the heritage seed from farmers who
haven’t planted conventional seeds in eight or nine years.
“I hope there’s some good news in this picture,” White said this
week. “It’s a monster, but people are waking up. The trend is finally
turning around and going back to conventional. I hope I can wake some
people up and get back to growing their own food.”
Even more important, White says, he hopes his book points out one of
the ways people can see that the end of earthly time is at hand.
“Unsaved reader, it’s altar call again,” White writes in his book’s
conclusion. “The food shortages have begun. … The 666′s are in the
seed.”
posted December 4, 2008 at 3:34 pm
This is what I posted at Crunchy Con about this issue, when Rod Dreher picked up on this story:
I’ve been wondering when this blog would finally get around to the issue of genetically modified crops and control of seeds.
Forget this guy’s view on the Antichrist. This is Monsanto’s attempt to CONTROL WORLD FOOD PRODUCTION.
They have developed a seed that is popularly referred to as a “terminator seed.” You can’t reuse it because it’s ENGINEERED TO BE STERILE. Farmers who use Monsanto seeds have to buy them year after year. I’m pretty sure they do this in developing countries as well. They like to portray themselves as being oh-so-benevolent in this. What they are actually doing is attempting to create a total dependence on their garish products.
This is why it is so important to develop and store heirloom seed stocks and nurture biodiversity. Relying on genetically modified crops to feed us forever is like relying on Frankenstein’s monster to keep the human race going.
Forget the Antichrist angle and the rustic everybody likes to mock. The man’s story goes far beyond that.
posted December 4, 2008 at 3:55 pm
Authentic conservatism should be dead set against any concentration of power, especially that which seeks to control food production. Around the world the agribusiness giants have met with resistance to their plans, from genetic engineering to attempts to patent strains of plants which have been in use thousands of years. Only in the US do these corporations seem to have free reign to “engineer” as they please, suppress attempts to label their products as having been genetically modified, and patent life at will.
I had hoped that with Obama things might change, but his selection of Vilsac as secretary of agriculture all but guarantees the continuation of agribusiness as usual.
Liberals and conservatives can and must unite on this issue. Pope Benedict XVI recently added genetic engineering to the list of serious, or mortal, sins. Kudos to him – it’s time to say enough is enough.
posted December 4, 2008 at 3:57 pm
I am less worried about “terminator seed”, than I am about seed that spreads its engineered genetics to other plants. If it pollinates your crops with (lets call it viral seed) viral seed then you have a new problem. You now have their property on your property. I think there is a documentary called future of food. Think about it. Can anyone validate this?
posted December 4, 2008 at 4:37 pm
One question I have about this is whether orgs like Seed Savers Exchange (http://www.seedsavers.org/) are running afoul of the law. Does anyone know? What, exactly, constitutes a breaking of the rules pertaining to seed patents?
I agree with A. Prof that Michael White’s story is far larger than his eschatological views. Though I admit I felt a little snarky when I first read the article, in the end I realized that I really admire what he’s done for seed cultivation. That’s the real story.
posted December 4, 2008 at 8:24 pm
At least there is a seed conservancy on Svalbard just in case everything runs amuck from Agribusiness. Monsanto invented aspertame, just one molecule away from formaldehyde.
posted December 4, 2008 at 8:49 pm
Patton asks “One question I have about this is whether…Seed Savers Exchange… are running afoul of the law”
Heirloom seeds aren’t patented.
SSE doesn’t save Monsanto hybrids.
posted December 6, 2008 at 1:00 am
Although it may be outdated in some places now, Vandana Shiva’s book Stolen Harvest, from 2000, also has some really good analysis regarding seed patents and intellectual property rights. If I correctly remember what she argued, Monsanto’s specialty is to study specialized crop hybrids from primarily Third World agrarian communities (such as rice), eventually obtain patents for the hybrids, and then sue the agrarian community for intellectual property theft. IOW, neocolonialism. Nice guys.
Shiva’s style is about as subtle as an anvil dropped on a concrete floor, but she’s brilliant and fascinating to read/listen to. Challenging (in a good way) as well.
posted December 9, 2008 at 8:54 am
I only have one comment regarding the question of rather Barack Obama is the anti-christ it is my understanding that the anti-christ will be of European decent.