I am not a fuss-budget…or I hope I am not, anyway…about kids and how easily we let them make holidays out of holy days. Making parties out of events is part of the magic of childhood, not to mention one of its great virtues. Beside, by definition, holy days are “Feasts” in the rhetoric of the Church, a naming that itself would seem to imply at least some degree of “party,” even for somber dates like the feast day of some poor saint or martyr. But fuss-budget or no, I had an attack of restiveness last week; and I have chewed on it ever since.
We were visiting out of town and in a church where we had never been before. The pastor did what is common practice in many formal services nowadays, and invited all the children in the congregation to come join him at the chancel steps for a few minutes of conversation and instruction. Afterward, they were all to go on downstairs to Children’s Church. Before they went downstairs, however, they were to have a few, special minutes of their own with him. The theory here is that, if nothing else, such a public time with senior clergy will help children gain some sense of ownership over the whole business of “real” church.
In theory, I think that approach is a sound idea. In actuality, it usually appalls me. That is, I am appalled by how the attendant adult congregation gets all wrapped up in whispering about how cute the children are, in tittering at their innocent responses to the pastor’s questions, and almost in patronizing the children for their innocence in scratching an inappropriate itch or smacking an annoying friend or simply getting up and wandering back toward the pew and mother from whence they had just come. My theory is, in other words, that we do this more for the amusement of the adults and the satisfaction of an abstract theory than we do it for the religious formation of our children. It’s a minor issue, perhaps, and it only bothers me passingly as a rule…except it bothered me far more than that last Sunday.
It bothered me because, it being Lent, the pastor asked the children gathered around him, what Lent was [they didn't know] and what it was we were waiting for. They, every single one of them, knew to answer to that one: We were waiting for Spring! When that answer proved to be, while correct, none the less not the desired one, they tried again. Finally, one little girl said, “Easter bunnies?” rather tentatively; and the whole two steps-full of children clapped and laughed and called out their approval of this solution to the problem. At this point, the pastor more or less gave up. Making no more than a cursory attempt at tying Jesus to bunnies, he patted two or three of them on their heads and shooed the whole crew on down to Children’s Church.
It has been said…biblically, in fact…that out of the mouths of babes and children shall the truth come. It came for me last Sunday. Sanctimonious kids programmed to spout religious doctrine on command are scary to me, because they usually make scary adults. Totally secularized kids, while generally more charming, can be scary as well; for they may never be tempered and seasoned by engagement with the holiness of life and creation. But the scariest of all, I decided last Sunday, are the children who, being reared without lived religious instruction, grow up thinking that the forms, rhythms, and patterns of religion are religion. They are the scariest because they can grow up to become adults who never, ever perceive their own souls’ sterility…much like many of the adults we all know, in fact.





posted February 26, 2008 at 11:09 am
Oh boy…there is way to much truth in this. I know exactly how the author feels. Happily, I don’t experience this often….but when I do, the floor beneth the pew looks really good to me!
posted February 26, 2008 at 12:16 pm
Dear Phyllis
Thank you for the word about children’s time with the pastor in worship. I am a pastor who takes this time in the worship seriously. In fact, I often talk with the children about praying and have even used THIS IS WHAT I PRAY TODAY as a tool in praying with the children. I m very concerned that children not be used as a side show to amuse and entertain the adults.
Oh, and I guess you know why I like the book! the editor is near and dear to me,
posted February 26, 2008 at 12:58 pm
Love the way you write… thanks… But about your last paragraph, about the children… “who grow up thinking that the forms, rhythms, and patterns of religion are religion.” Hmmm… seems to me that that is correct… forms, rhythms and patterns are in fact religion. What’s scary is when that religion becomes a substitute for The Relationship. Thanks, Jonathan at http://www.theproblemwithreligion.com
posted February 27, 2008 at 5:00 am
You know, I was with you until the last paragraph. While your disapproval was clear, your use of vocabulary was over my head, and I have a higher education degree in English! Mind you, I agree with the argument that the cutesy moments in church are more for entertainment than anything else. Also, I agree that the children seem to be part of a cycle in behavior; however, I don’t see much wrong with children growing-up with the notion that life is bright and optimistic. Furthermore, I don’t remember anything about Jesus laying the burdens of life on their shoulders as they gathered around them. I do remember he used their joy and faith to teach the adults. Perhaps that is what is missing (and I do agree that something is significantly askew). The lesson could be about the faith of a child to enter heaven. This message was intended for the observing adults, not the children really. If children can focus they can learn, the same may be said of adults. Maybe the focus is what is missing.
I enjoy your column, so keep writing and praying. Simple faith for troubled times.