The commercial brilliance of Pandora is that I'm is constantly introduced to songs I've not heard before, and with one click I can purchase any song on iTunes or Amazon.
The struggle for Pandora is music royalties. Record labels doubled the royalty rates they were charging Internet radio stations in 2007, requiring Internet radio stations to pay double what satellite radio stations pay. Pandora, and many other Internet music services and stations, almost collapsed. Congress called a time-out to study the issue.
It will really be a shame if Congress and the major record labels cannot adapt to the changing way that consumers enjoy music. Changes are, of course, inevitable. The only question is how these changes take place and who ends up as king-of-the-hill.
I'm just filling out my Pandora profile, but it does give a glimpse into what I'm listening to.

Add to Newsvine
Add to StumbleUpon
thanks for the recommendation. i like it better than lastfm for sure.
thank you!
Tony,
My problem with Pandora is the lack of "quality" measurement. I like Bruce Hornsby mainly because he is a skillful and articulate artist... the fact that I enjoy his overall sound/genre is secondary. There are tons of artists who's records sound similar to Hornsby, but... to be frank... many of them suck.
I suppose a quality measurement is, in a sense, subjective. Do you find this to be problematic in your stations?
Post a Comment
By submitting these comments, I agree to the beliefnet.com terms of service, rules of conduct and privacy policy (the "agreements"). I understand and agree that any content I post is licensed to beliefnet.com and may be used by beliefnet.com in accordance with the agreements.