The New Christians

Comment of the Day

Thursday January 8, 2009

Seth R., a practicing Mormon, weighs in on the Trinity and, in particular, my chosen trinitarian formulation:

Tony, it's interesting in the same article where you conclude that Mormons are not Christians, you admit that you yourself are a "Social Trinitarian" in bent.

You ought to check out Mormon scholars like Blake Ostler and David Paulsen. Their central argument and thesis is that Mormonism is actually social trinitarian. They make a pretty compelling case based on Mormon scripture in the Book of Mormon and Doctrine and Covenants. The idea is that there are three distinct individuals who are perfectly united in love. Perichoresis I believe is the term. A perfect unity of will and purpose such that each member of the godhead literally inhabits the mind of the others. To know one is to know the others.

I myself am an active Mormon and consider myself Social Trinitarian. I find it to be completely compatible with Mormon scripture and the statements of Joseph Smith and other LDS leaders. Most Mormons would not know the correct theological term for their beliefs. But I believe few would find much to criticize in the language of social trinitarianism. Some Mormons do tend to lean more tri-theist. But then again, I've found modalism to be pretty darn prevalent in Evangelical and Protestant circles - even the ministers are almost outright modalists (though they'd never admit it).

Problem is that both modalism and tri-theism are at least logically coherent statements about God. Classical trinitarianism tries to have it both ways and ultimately makes sense neither way. It's an utterly illogical and incoherent mess. Social Trinitarianism gets around the problem by making the unity of the three not one of "substance" (a purely philosophical innovation the theologians at Nicea beggared from the Neo-Platonists), but rather a profound unity of purpose, will, mind and love.

This same sort of unity or perichoresis is at the very heart of the highest aspirations of every Mormon. I ultimately seek the same sort of perichoresis with my wife. I hope ultimately to experience it with God as well. "If ye are not one, ye are not mine."

Anyway, Social Trinitarianism is very much a possibility for any Mormon, and indeed, I think various passages in the Book of Mormon about the unity of God all but demand a Social Trinitarian read on Mormon theology.

Anyway, I just found it rather odd that a professed Social Trinitarian would have a problem with Mormonism's views on trinity. We basically are social trinitarians, even if we don't know the correct term for it.

Advertisement
Comments
Irritable
January 8, 2009 12:46 PM

This just in: having grown weary of anathematizing the LGBT community, the defenders of orthodoxy commenting over at The New Christians have set their sites on Mormons. Film at eleven.

Irritable
January 8, 2009 1:00 PM
http://irritablereaching.blogspot.com/

Rats. I thought I provided my URL, which would explain my moniker and provide plenty of evidence to write me off as a liberal. So much for being smooth.

HiveRadical
January 8, 2009 2:50 PM
http://www.youtube.com/user/HiveRadical

I never understood how the Creedal view on the trinity could be ultimately defended. For example what happened to the homoousian trinity when, as Christ says (and regardless the fact that he's verbatim quoting OT scripture doesn't mean he means the words any less, or that the words are not applicable to his condition) "My God My God why hast thou forsaken me?"

Had the Father forsaken the Son? How can something of the same substance forsake itself? Why did Christ say "Touch me not, for I have not ascended to my Father"?

There was a clear and complete separation if we take Christ at his words. And if we're not taking him at His words then I think there are bigger issues than mere ontology that we have to address. If you think there was some mystery meaning in why Christ said those things then you've got some clever explaining to do.

Anywho. That's one of the biggest befuddlements I have about trying to figure out why everyone is ready to trust an extra-biblical council on the final word on the nature of God when it's in such stark contrast to actual events and statements in the Bible given by Christ himself.

HiveRadical
January 8, 2009 3:33 PM
http://www.youtube.com/user/HiveRadical

Chris you are in error. You say--

"These doctrines fly directly in the face of what the ONE TRUE God has revealed.

Isaiah 43:10 “You are my witnesses,” declares the LORD,
“and my servant whom I have chosen,
that you may know and believe me
and understand that I am he.
Before me no god was formed,
nor shall there be any after me.

Mormons ARE NOT Christians by any stretch of the imagination. "

The problem is that you do not understand LDS doctrine, if you did you'd see that there is no conflict with that scripture.


You see we believe that all humans are co-eternal with Christ and God. The doctrine of gnolaum

"these two spirits, notwithstanding one is more intelligent than the other, have no beginning; they existed before, they shall have no end, they shall exist after, for they are gnolaum, or eternal."

--Abraham 3:19

You see just as--

"Jesus increased in wisdom and stature, and in favour with God and man."

--Luke 5:52

So, too, can we. I believe that Christ's Atonement covers us to the point of rendering us as though we had never sinned, that's why-

"Till we all come in the unity of the faith, and of the knowledge of the Son of God, unto a perfect man, unto the measure of the stature of the fulness of Christ:"

Ephesians 4:13

is possible and why

"The Spirit itself beareth witness with our spirit, that we are the children of God: And if children, then heirs; heirs of God, and joint-heirs with Christ; if so be that we suffer with him, that we may be also glorified together."

Romans 8:16-17

is also possible. Just as Jesus was not formed before the Father neither were we. Just because Christ grew in knowledge and stature does not mean that he was at any point insufficient. And when Christ purges us of our sins he does so to such a completeness that it is as though we'd never sinned. Sharing thusly both perfection and the co-eternal attributes of Christ we become "joint-heirs" and we come to the fullness of the stature of Christ.

We take Christ at his word more literally and completely than any other faith I've ever seen.

HiveRadical
January 8, 2009 3:56 PM

If we take those mentioned by Eric from revelations and consider--

"That they all may be one; as thou, Father, art in me, and I in thee, that they also may be one in us: that the world may believe that thou hast sent me."

John 17:21

We may have more than a mere 9.

Read All Comments

Post a Comment

By submitting these comments, I agree to the beliefnet.com terms of service, rules of conduct and privacy policy (the "agreements"). I understand and agree that any content I post is licensed to beliefnet.com and may be used by beliefnet.com in accordance with the agreements.



Please type the text you see in the box below to verify your post and help us prevent spam. You have a limited time to type - you may wish to compose your comment in a separate document and paste it here upon completion.

Type the characters you see in the picture above.

Advertisement

Search This Blog

About The New Christians

Tony Jones is the author of many books, including The New Christians: Dispatches from the Emergent Frontier and The Sacred Way: Spiritual Practices for Everyday Life. He is a leader in the emergent church movement and a renowned expert on postmodern theology and the American church landscape.


Find out more about Tony, his books, and his speaking schedule at his website.

feed icon Subscribe

RSS Feed

Receive updates from The New Christians
Tony on Twitter:
My Amazon Favorites:


Social Networks:
Facebook
LinkedIn
Flickr
YouTube
Vimeo
Pandora

Calendar

Advertisement

Advertisement


About Beliefnet

Our mission is to help people like you find, and walk, a spiritual path that will bring comfort, hope, clarity, strength, and happiness. More about Beliefnet.

Legal

Copyright © Beliefnet, Inc. and/or its licensors. All rights reserved. Use of this site is subject to Terms of Service and to our Privacy Policy. Constructed by Beliefnet.

Advertisement

Report as Inappropriate

You are reporting this content because it violates the Terms of Service.

All reported content is logged for investigation.