|
Previous Posts
My Blog Has Moved
Dear Readers,
After a year with Beliefnet, I've decided to move to my own domain for my blogging. It's been a fine year -- some things worked, other things didn't. But in the end, I'll be a better blogger on my own. My thanks to the Bnet editorial staff; they've been very supportive.
Ple
posted 12:13:57pm Nov. 13, 2009 |
read full post
»
The Most Important Cartoon of the Year
By Steve Breen, San Diego Tribune, October 18, 2009
posted 8:51:22am Oct. 25, 2009 |
read full post
»
Social Media for Pastors
Following up on Christianity21, we at JoPa Productions are developing a series of boot camps for pastors who want to learn about and utilize social media tools like blogging, Twitter, and Facebook. These are one-day, hands-on learning experiences, currently offered in the Twin Cities and soon
posted 10:45:52am Oct. 22, 2009 |
read full post
»
Ending Christian Euphemisms: "Fundamentalist"
I've taken some heat in the comment section for using yesterday's post on "unbiblical" and a "higher view of scripture" as a thin foil for my own disregard of biblical standards. To the contrary, I was pointing to the use of the word unbiblical as a stand-in for a particularly thin hermeneutic. Ther
posted 10:15:41am Oct. 21, 2009 |
read full post
»
Why You Should Get GENERATE
Last week at Christianity21, GENERATE Magazine debuted. With the tag line, "an artifact of the emergence conversation," it fit perfectly at the gathering. When I actually got around to reading it last weekend, I was truly surprised at how good it is.There have been several efforts to begin a paper j
posted 3:14:37pm Oct. 20, 2009 |
read full post
»
|
posted March 5, 2009 at 8:23 am
Angela: “I’ve come to believe that instead, turn the other cheek meant to surrender, to lay down your life, to present yourself to be crucified, if that’s the way of love.”
I disagree. Too many times the ideas of “turning the other cheek” and “presenting onself to be cricified” do more harm than good. We shouldn’t turn the other cheek to a physically abusive person. We shouldn’t turn the other cheek to someone who is emotionally abusive. We shouldn’t turn the other cheek to a rapist. We shouldn’t turn the other cheek to a nation who is causing genocide. The list could go on and on. Obviously, Angela didn’t explicity suggest these things. But the ideas do have an impact in the lives of many Christians. In my experience as a councelor and chaplain, I have seen them at work. Pastors and other church leaders need to be very careful when promoting these ideas and using this language. It’s the councelors and chaplains that have to help people get over the damage that these theologies do. So I urge caution and mindfulness. We need to think about the ethical implications of the theologies we teach. The following is one article that I have written on this topic:
http://ephphatha-poetry.blogspot.com/2009/03/lies-my-preacher-told-me-during-lent.html
posted March 5, 2009 at 11:35 am
Brian, you are mistaking “turn the other cheek” with “do nothing”.
posted March 5, 2009 at 1:44 pm
Amen. It is called Pacifism, not Passivism. Nonviolence MUST be active…it is a way of engagement, not the absence of engagement. I recommend you read Kurlansky’s “Nonviolence” as an excellent overview of how folks have actively employed nonviolence.
posted March 5, 2009 at 2:42 pm
We need to be actively anti-violent. There is much we have to learn from the Quakers.
posted March 5, 2009 at 2:43 pm
My link above is another resource along those same lines.
posted March 7, 2009 at 6:57 am
All for being active against violence. The early comment ‘within reason’…. mmmmmmm, nothing like taking a text and making it fit your own image instead of God’s image.
Slavery, Capital Punishment….. does it look familiar?