The New Christians

Death of Emergent Round-Up

Sunday June 7, 2009

Categories: Emergent Church
Nick Fiedler: We didn't want Emergent to become the new club, but we wanted it to organize so that through gatherings, cohorts, and online social networks it could create it's own grouping and lovingly force some voices out into the...
Advertisement
Comments
Mike Young
June 7, 2009 3:57 PM
http://field.wordpress.com

I find the drama rather amusing. I posted the following a good while ago during a similar flair up regarding emergent church. It still applies to me anyway...

emerge |iˈmərj| verb [ intrans. ] “move out of or away from something and come into view”

There was an interesting question that I ran across on the emergent village weblog several weeks ago. It actually arose on Andrew Jones’ blog, Tall Skinny Kiwi: “Emerging Church–does the hat still fit?” The responses range from yea to nay. (funny how that usually works) Some of the “nays” seem vaguely similar to fans of an underground band screaming “SELL-OUT” when “their band” makes the big-time. Sort of a “it-was-great-while-this-was-my-little-secret-club–but now-that-everybody-does-it-I’ll-trash-it…” kind of thing. Others seem a little more legit in that they are frustrated with the marketing of the term among many who simply misunderstand what’s going on as merely “the next big thing.”
I think as long as “emerging” was a verb, it was a helpful term for those of us whom it described. We were “moving out of or away from” institutions, cultures, religious structures, etc. that we were finding increasingly inadequate or problematic. What began to “come into view” was the number of people who shared our discomfort and relationships began to form. Where the word began to become uncomfortable was its evolution into a noun: “Emerging Church”, “Emergent Service”, and maybe even the early clamor heard when “emergent village” was formed and events, books and other product “emerged.” I do not necessarily have a problem with the “noun” expressions of emerging faith. I’ve bought many of the books and attended several of the events. Most of these nouns have broadened my spiritual imagination and provided new motivation to continue my journey following God in the way of Jesus. As long as the missional verbs continue to drive the institutional nouns, this will continue to be a helpful place, and a helpful term (at least for me).

Mr. T!
June 7, 2009 4:00 PM

I'm sure you're all familiar with that repetitive line about modern christianity being too oriented around personal salvation, a gospel of personal salvation and ONLY Personal Salvation, at the expense of the other things we read about in the NT. It's difficult for us to move beyond being "me"-centered and to act like our own perceptions, experiences, and opinions are as limited as they really are. We can become prisoners of living inside ourselves.

You've heard that lick about living in a crass consumerist culture and how damaging it is to feed this selfish materialism and consumption with no regard for the unseen negative effects on others. And, perhaps, how this spirit has infected the church, where we merely become consumers of religious goods and services. We might start to give everything our own little consumer rating. "Cater to me!"

How about the cult of personality? Remember that tune by Living Color and Vernon Reid's gnarly guitar riff? Yep.

I once heard a preacher say that if I were the only one to ever follow Jesus, he still would have died on the cross for just one person. When he was on the cross, I was on his mind. Interesting perspective.

The living Jesus has certainly delivered some serious personal salvation to me, and continues to do so. Nobody knows the trouble I've been... um, I mean "seen". But the emergent conversation has saved me from having to walk away from church. I am willing to wrestle with the teachings of Jesus, difficult as they may be, but the kakamamie messages I hear from christians in the public sphere... ugh! Give me a break. Christians could stand to be more Jesus-centered. Jesus is attractional. He should be lifted up in more ways than cheesy emotive worship tunes or boring, dusty liturgy and restrictive traditions, structures, and, Lord have mercy!, church politics.

After doing some time as a worship leader in a "seeker sensitive" church [ugh!], I wandered in the wilderness for a stretch... dreaming of a church [literal dreams; I'm an old man] that incarnated interpretive faith community in different ways than I had witnessed. Specific dreams and specific ways. And then I stumbled into Solomon's Porch and there were all of those dreams already in practice. Huh! I can only imagine.

If someone says something like emergent "fails to offer a truly different process to match their convictions. We can talk about "postmodern theological hegemony" all day but in reality you walk into a significant emerging/ent church/gathering you will (in the end) find the same process with a different aesthetic. That is about it.", they simply don't know of what they speak. I've been living the dream for 8 years now.

I'm sorry Solomon's Porch hasn't become a model and exported its practices and style throughout the U.S. and the world. No I'm NOT!!! That approach is ridiculous, outmoded, and dysfunctional. We do the difficult and messy work of becoming a theological, interpretive community where all are welcomed and encouraged to participate. We are more than a Sunday service, a statement of faith, a set of doctrinal distinctives, a worship style, some reasoned intellectual propositions, or followers of one "responsible" white male pastor. We are all responsible for being implicated by the bible narrative and the inspiration of brave forebears in the faith, and putting that inspiration and faith into action. The Porch is not flawless [by a long shot] or for everybody, but it is practicing the faith in different ways and with different underlying philosophies than I've encountered.

Every individual person and faith community has to be responsible for figuring these difficult things out for themselves, doing the hard, messy work, and allowing the Spirit of Jesus to mold and guide and inspire. The end result should be a community that's both greater than the sum of its parts and reflective, in some way, of the Kingdom I'm sure you've all read about. Not toxic and repressive and reflective of the dysfunctional aspects of the culture at large.

If emergent has failed, then at least it saved one person. And it was all worth it.

Mike L.
June 7, 2009 4:20 PM
http://www.faithprogression.com

The Buddha said, "If you find the Buddha, kill it". I think this can be applied to the Emergent conversation. If we ever find (define) Emergent, we should kill it too.

I think people starting "finding" Emergent or in other words, they began defining it, identifying with it, and noticing it as a thing unto itself rather than a change in our own larger communities. If Emergent yields fruit, it won't be seen under any Emergent banner. It will be seen by the changes it has on Christianity, and the world. If Emergent is successful in 20 years, it will be completely gone, and Christianity will be a little closer to the message of Jesus because of these conversations.

Tim
June 7, 2009 5:17 PM

I'm not disappointed in Emergent! Largely from a distance, I've benefited from the conversations, books, podcasts, blogs, etc. With the changes in context there has to be a place where, "We need to talk..." can happen. Thanks for making it happen. Salaam, peace, shalom.

Annie
June 7, 2009 8:46 PM

"We (the emerging church) have always accepted new guys into the fold,"

Can I just point out that I am totally excluded by this statement?

Yes, I'm obnoxious.

Mike Young
June 7, 2009 8:57 PM

Love it Annie

brian
June 7, 2009 9:03 PM

I first note that any failure either actual or perceived is mine and do to a lack of personal character, spiritual strength etc. I have not been part of "the conversation" or any conversation other then one or two blogs for years. For years I have asked questions, I E questions of origins, literal vs figurative, Christian vs non Christian etc. salvation, hope eternal life, Jesus, the atonement, etc. After many years of asking these questions in the faith community, I have come to learn Church is the very last place to discuss spiritual issues. I was listening to a very prominent Teacher and Pastor on youtube, then listened to his sermon in total. He was and is very eloquent and convincing on the surface. He spoke of how the Bible answers perfectly all scientific issues the scriptures discuss. I E The Water Cycle so we get Job 36:27-28 Isaiah 55:10-11 or Genesis 1:2-9, Psalm 104:6-9,describe plate tectonics or Leviticus 13:46 the nature of infectious diseases. Im sorry but I dont see it. I really do not. This fine pastor, and I mean that with deep respect, also spoke about a literal flood accounting for all the natural features we now observe. I may be wrong but I don’t see it.

Many of us struggle with the what we now know, but that we look to the emergent and other streams of the faith to try to find answers, the old streams are all dried up in many ways.

Stushie
June 7, 2009 11:42 PM
http://www.glenkirk.blogspot.com

This must be a Holy Spirit thing. I was led to write a post about this last night...:)

http://glenkirk.blogspot.com/2009/06/after-emergent-post-emergent-church.html

Your Name
June 8, 2009 1:53 PM

The Emergent conversation continues to be a valuable resource to me. I went through a period of evangelical, mega-church fall-out, questioning whether the Way of Jesus was really working. My experiences and conversations first with Up/Rooted in Chicago and now with the new Cobb Emergent Cohort in Atlanta have strengthened my faith, opened my mind, and allowed me to overcome prejudices that kept me from enjoying the fullness of God's grace. I am hopeful, emergence is ever changing. To keep moving forward we have to let go of what is behind. I look forward to what Spirit will do in shaping new emergences.

Ted Seeber
June 8, 2009 4:31 PM

Or Men Without Hats channeling Tony 20 years in the past:
I don't want to be a Messiah, Messiahs die young.

NIck
June 8, 2009 5:21 PM
http://thehopefulskeptic.com/blog

I don't think it's fizzling. My disappointment is my own.

Sorry to start something that ended in needing a roundup.

Thank you for all of you in the trenches.

I will always be in for conversating.

Tony do you respond in comments?

Becky R-P
June 9, 2009 11:20 AM

Young people can be awfully impatient, and I suppose all of us are tempted to want some instant gratification.

We have to remember how deep change happens - it does not move in a smooth trajectory like a rocket, but in jerks and fits and starts like a 74 Vega standard shift with a bad clutch trying to start on a hill.

I think that (unfavorably) comparing emergent/emergence/emerging to the 16th Century Reformation is ridiculous at this point, b/c both the "Reformation" label itself and its rock stars were finally settled on by history many, many years after the dust settled, not in the midst of everything. While in the midst of it, one can make great guesses as to who "started" something, but the perspective you need won't come until the shift has happened and you're into the post-shift phase.

In addition to the danger of being impatient is the danger of being parochial. In that regard, I don't know that I would start "emergent" with Brian, Doug and Tony anyway. What about the UK? The folks in the C of E and Methodist churches are 10 or 15 years "ahead" of us in this "conversation", and I'll bet many Americans can't name more than 3 people from over there.

If we have to name names in this country, why start w/ Brian et al.? Take a longer view of the post-industrial age historical movement and you come up with folks like Dorothy Day and N. Gordon Cosby and MLK, Jr. and THEIR current day heroes, including, of course, Gandhi. But here's the cool part - some of the people who worked very closely with these people, who carried on the revolution, DID have lives that involved normal things like homemaking and cleaning houses. Think Rosa Parks.

What we need to do is worry a lot less about whether Emergents are up to snuff as far as their place in history and remember why this "emergence" is happening at all: "Christian" modernity created the most polarizing, bloodthirsty culture since humans climbed out of the trees. In that regard, Brian is absolutely right about one thing: Everything MUST change.

stushie
June 9, 2009 2:11 PM
http://www.glenkirk.blogspot.com

Nice to see Dorothy Day getting a mention in the comments of this post. She is one of the most under-rated Christian movers of the 20th century...possibly because she wasn't holy or saintly enough for mainstreamers.

Geoff
June 9, 2009 7:22 PM
http://musingsonyouthministry.blogspot.com/

i might just not get the emergant movement, but to me, it seems like it is a lot bigger than just churches and movements and all that.

it seems like an aknowledgement that there has been a huge change in our society. it seems like affirming that there is a different way of thinking about god and how we see our faith lived out.

that is not a movement, it is not a way of holding a church service. there may be ways of adressing that, which come out of the shift, but to me emergence is the shift more than the response.

randy buist
June 10, 2009 2:53 PM

So I coach volleyball and not t-ball. But I have lots of friends who have no job, no money, and have sacrificed so much in the name of Jesus Christ, the kingdom of God as partially realized eschatology, as well as living as missional people. To say that people haven't sacrificed? I guess I can only say, "Welcome to the conversation."

And for those who still have $500 in their bank accounts and have been around for more than a few years, they've likely been labeled heretics by more than one reformed theologian in America.

From Grand Rapids. :)

Theresa Seeber
June 11, 2009 1:24 AM
http://eyesofhope.wordpress.com/2009/06/05/response-to-nick-fiedlers-great-disappointment/

Well, what about yours truly? :-) I too posted on this. And yes, I am attention-seeking. You thought I was kidding about being a groupie? LOL

Post a Comment

By submitting these comments, I agree to the beliefnet.com terms of service, rules of conduct and privacy policy (the "agreements"). I understand and agree that any content I post is licensed to beliefnet.com and may be used by beliefnet.com in accordance with the agreements.



Please type the text you see in the box below to verify your post and help us prevent spam. You have a limited time to type - you may wish to compose your comment in a separate document and paste it here upon completion.

Type the characters you see in the picture above.

Advertisement

Search This Blog

About The New Christians

Tony Jones is the author of many books, including The New Christians: Dispatches from the Emergent Frontier and The Sacred Way: Spiritual Practices for Everyday Life. He is a leader in the emergent church movement and a renowned expert on postmodern theology and the American church landscape.


Find out more about Tony, his books, and his speaking schedule at his website.

feed icon Subscribe

RSS Feed

Receive updates from The New Christians
Tony on Twitter:
My Amazon Favorites:


Social Networks:
Facebook
LinkedIn
Flickr
YouTube
Vimeo
Pandora

Calendar

Advertisement

Advertisement


About Beliefnet

Our mission is to help people like you find, and walk, a spiritual path that will bring comfort, hope, clarity, strength, and happiness. More about Beliefnet.

Legal

Copyright © Beliefnet, Inc. and/or its licensors. All rights reserved. Use of this site is subject to Terms of Service and to our Privacy Policy. Constructed by Beliefnet.

Advertisement

Report as Inappropriate

You are reporting this content because it violates the Terms of Service.

All reported content is logged for investigation.