Melanie Bettinelli has an excellent post - helpful not just in the links she provides, but in her perspective as one who has prayed the LIturgy of the Hours - with varying degrees of "success" - for years.
A good rule of thumb is not to get too stressed about it. If you only
have time to pray one psalm, pray just that. In the past few years as a
mother of small children I have learned how to pick up and put down my
prayer book as the demands of my children allow, how to pause in the
middle of a psalm to read The Big Red Barn five or six times and then
pick back up again where I left off when the toddler wanders off again
in the middle of the sixth read through.
It is very nice to wake up before the kids do to have some quiet prayer
and at certain seasons I manage it; but at other seasons (like in the
first trimester or as now when nursing a newborn) I listen to my body's
need to sleep and just pray when I can after breakfast. I'm much more
of a night owl anyway and do try to set aside some time for prayer
after the kids are in bed. Sometimes I involve Bella and Sophie,
reading the psalms and prayers out loud, singing the hymns with them,
getting them to recite the antiphons, etc. If you've got older kids,
you might try having them read the prayers with you or take turns
reading.
One thing I would stress is going slowly and being prepared for
failures. It can be hard to keep it up and over the almost ten years
I've been praying the Liturgy of the Hours I've fallen away from the
habit and then picked myself up and started again many, many, many
times. I always do find that when I fall away I miss it and it eats at
me until I pick back up again. But I try not to beat myself up over the
times that I am too tired or too distracted to pray. Likewise, don't
worry too much about praying the entire office if it is too much at
first. You might start off with just one psalm. Don't worry if you get
interrupted and have to stop in the middle. Especially if you're a busy
mom.
While I'm at it, let me give some props to
Melanie - there are a lot of very fine writers in the Catholic blogosphere and in the blogosphere, period of course. I do think that Melanie is one of the best - she taught English at the college level, is an avid reader and eloquent writer about books.
Every once in a while I dip into the world of "MommyBlogging" - not in terms of participation but in terms of..I don't know...a subculture? Because subcultures fascinate me? Because, aside from being a child development researcher I should have been an anthropologist? Up until recently (probably the "April Rose" scam a couple of months ago) I had no idea that MommyBlogging was
1) such a big, self-defined and even (for some) lucrative area of blogging
and
2) such a hot battleground of infighting and finger-pointing about fraud, greed and deception.
I mean - step back, people. You're gonna get hurt, definitely.
The big women's blogging convention -
BlogHer - was held in Chicago this past weekend, and already the stories are flying - the thing, I am gathering (man, I thought I was up on this Internet thing, but apparently not, and in a big way) is that marketers have discovered bloggers, escpecially mombloggers, as great assets, and so bloggers are regularly sent free stuff to review on their blogs - which, of course, none of us with stacks of books on the floor from Doubleday or Simon and Schuster or Ave Maria Press can criticize. But...it's a really big deal, and I had no idea. You've even got a little kerfuffle about a Crocs rep saying that he was threatened by a momblogger at Blogher - because she missed out on the Crocs giveaway and if
he didn't give her some, she'd badmouth the brand on her blog.(Pause to say....badmouthing
Crocs? Gee, I can't imagine why...they're so
pretty....)
As far as I can say, the two major MommyBlogging subcultures are:
1) The Christians
and
2) The Don't-Give-A-F***- MommyBloggers who are in turn either
a) of the "Martini Play Date" cadre
or
b) some version of really green/punk/boho/unschooling visionaries.
Some combination of (1) and 2(b) is certainly possibly, but (1) and 2 (a) rarely intersect, even, you might be surprised to learn, among Catholics.
All are valued for their presumed honesty, either about their faith and (often) children's health problems or their conflicted emotions about parenthood.
I don't say this to mock - at all - way too often people take my mere descriptions as some kind of criticism. It's not. I really don't care, except to the extent that it interests me and tells me something about human nature, even my own. I'm into observing and describing and figuring stuff out, that's all.
I'm mostly interested because it reveals to me, in my own little bubble, how small that bubble is, with bubble walls that are more opaque than I thought.
I mean..until a month or so ago, I had never even
heard of
Dooce, aka Heather Armstrong, but now I understand she's on
Forbes' list of 30 most influential women in media. (Although I have to take that back a bit - I do recall reading about her firing from her job for blogging...yeah, I remember that.)
My ignorance says nothing about Dooce or anyone else , but, I think, something about the fractured nature of our culture, which is all about the niche - and again, let me jump in and say - I don't think the niche thing is a bad thing - it's just the way it is. Personally, I'd rather have a couple hundred channels rather than 3, and it's perfectly fine with me that Walter Cronkite has not been replaced as The Most Trusted Man In America or whatever people said he was. I'm not into media gurus or a monolithic culture.
It's just
interesting to me, that I, in my little world of blog and Internet-perusing that is mainly limited to religion, politics and culture, can be so totally ignorant of another part of the culture that is apparently really absorbing and interesting and heated.
So how did I get here from the beginning of this post?