Virtual Talmud

Piety, Polity, and Darwinism

Wednesday January 25, 2006

Thank God U.S. District Court Judge John Jones III ruled that intelligent design (ID) is not science and therefore has no place in the classroom. Thank God that the concerned parents in Dover, PA, had the courage to fight their school board on this issue. Our constitutional guarantees of separation of church and state and the disestablishment of religion are only as secure as we make them by our vigilance and participation in the political process.

That said, what are we, as Jews, to believe during this brouhaha about science, faith and evolution?

Ironically, the very science that is under attack by the “faithful” strengthens my own faith.

That a biblical story thousands of years old even loosely reflects the steps that science, in the form of Darwin’s theory of evolution, has uncovered, seems incredible, unless the biblical text was inspired by the very creator responsible for these events. (How else would an ancient people have conceived of such a thing?)

The whole six, 24-hour, day program, of course, seems clearly metaphoric: God’s sense of time is certainly not our own. I chalk up minor discrepancies between the evolutionary record and the biblical text to the way God needed to communicate in a simple manner to an ancient people. Nevertheless, to me, the seeds of evolutionary theory are there in the biblical text, as simple life forms are followed by more complex life forms. Darwin’s theory merely exposes how God’s hand worked behind the scenes throughout prehistory, as it so often has done throughout human history.

If that sounds like ID, in a way it is, because I believe in God as creator of the world. But that doesn’t mean I think ID belongs in the classroom. I believe there is a difference between personal piety and communal polity, between being an honest observer of the world while retaining one’s own personal faith and foisting one’s own faith upon others.

The most important point of the creation story, though, has nothing to do with science or the (pre)historical reliability of the biblical text. It has to do with the values that make the Bible eternally sacred and relevant.

In particular, these values are found in one little word that appears repeatedly in the Creation story: the word “good.” The physical world is good and was created for good.

Our lives here have a God-given value, meaning, purpose, and responsibility: to actualize that good in the world. That is the essence of the Jewish reading of Scripture. All the rest is commentary.
Advertisement
Comments
senlin
January 26, 2006 4:27 PM
HASH(0x212ff480)

Uh, Jim, most scientists do accept evolution as an extremely probable theory. I agree that science relies on faith, to an extent, and some people can even worship science in and of itself. But since evolution seems to make logical sense, as well as have scientific endorsement today, why not take R. Grossman's approach and say, "Wow, this really strengthens my faith and helps me appreciate the wonder of creation"??

Elizabeth
January 26, 2006 5:15 PM
HASH(0x212ff7bc)

Evolution is taught as a theory, based on observation, as are other sciences and mathmatics. A theory remains until it is either proved or disproved. I can live with that. The problem with presenting ID or any other form of "G-d made this" to a public school class, is...how do you answer the follow-up questions? Whose G-d? I personally believe in One, and only One, but others disagree. Public school is not the place to sort this out, as there would not be enough time remaining in the school day to cover the basics we send our children there to learn. Your home and place of worship is a much more appropriate venue for those discussions. Despite what others might say, I believe that parents have more influence over their children than schools, peers, or others. Children learn from what we say, and do. Every comment and action is recorded, including expressed intolerance of the opinion of others, and lack of respect for education. I believe that stronger faith is developed when it is questioned.

Walter
January 27, 2006 2:40 PM
HASH(0x21300660)

Elizabeth: You are completely correct. Once we permit I.D. to come into schools Hindu children will try to tell the class that not only were the species created by a god, but that after they were preserved for a certain length of time by another god they were destroyed by a third god. This follows the polyteistic view of Hinduism which puts all (or almost all) of their gods into three lineages, from Brahma, the Creator to Vishnu, the Preserver, to Shiva, the Destroyer. It may be best to leave religious ideas in religious places and not to force it into the places of secular education.

redleg
January 27, 2006 4:05 PM
HASH(0x212fcf68)

And if nothing comes from nothing, but only from an intelligent designer Then -- where does that designer come from? Who made the watchmaker? And if the design is so intelligent - why does Down's Syndrome exist (strictly speaking they are mutants with a different number of chromosomes than normal humans), or Tay-Sachs, or small pox? Or a host of other conditions like XYY genes? Even Behe admitted under oath that ID is not science. I believe in a design but not as an article of science, especially because ID is only invoked to avoid hard reasearch and tough questions.

Elan Netser
January 30, 2006 3:54 PM
HASH(0x21301810)

of all things I agree with your conclusion. If I may reitirate it in my own words: The different between inteligent disign and evolution is that God created the world and at the end of each day, at the end of each task he looked at the work done and saw good, thus imbedding a value into it. where Is evolution, like all science, sees nothing but fact. Simple, cold, with no spirit or value fact. what we do with this fact is left to us. where is if we follow biblical thought - according to my humble opinion - than what we have around us is good. is full of value and thus should be preserved. And when used, used only for good.

Read All Comments

Advertisement

Search This Blog

About Virtual Talmud

This blog is no longer updated and is closed for comments. We welcome your comments about Judaism in our Judaism forums.

Brad Hirschfield currently blogs on Windows and Doors.

brad.jpg Author, radio and TV talk show host, and President of CLAL-The National Jewish Center for Learning and Leadership, Brad Hirschfield is the author of You Don’t Have To Be Wrong For Me To Be Right: Finding Faith Without Fanaticism. Listed as one of the nation’s 50 most influential rabbis in Newsweek, and a regular commentator on Court TV, he is the creator of the popular series, Building Bridges, airing on Bridges TV, and the co-host of the weekly radio show, Hirschfield and Kula.

More About Brad

radio.jpg
IntelligentTalkRadio.com
  clal.jpg
clal.org

book_rule.jpg

buybook.gif
  book_rule.jpg

buybook.gif

Advertisement

Advertisement


About Beliefnet

Our mission is to help people like you find, and walk, a spiritual path that will bring comfort, hope, clarity, strength, and happiness. More about Beliefnet.

Legal

Copyright © Beliefnet, Inc. and/or its licensors. All rights reserved. Use of this site is subject to Terms of Service and to our Privacy Policy. Constructed by Beliefnet.

Advertisement

Report as Inappropriate

You are reporting this content because it violates the Terms of Service.

All reported content is logged for investigation.