Should the Internet be used to publicize the names and alleged improprieties of alleged sexual predators? Is such use justified to protect victims and potential victims from sexual predators even if it runs roughshod over the requirement to protect innocent individuals from potentially false charges that can ruin their reputations and their careers?
According to Jewish tradition, a sexual predator is a rodef, a pursuer intending to harm another. As Jews we are obligated to not stand idly by, but to intervene to protect the victim. While we are not free to ignore the threat, nevertheless we are to use the minimum degree of force necessary to neutralize the threat posed by a perpetrator.
That is why I am uncomfortable with posting charges of sexual misconduct on Internet sites.
Jewish tradition teaches us that we are to protect the reputation of others: we are not to spread unconfirmed rumors (lashon hara, literally meaning evil talk), nor are we even to spread a bad name about others (motzi shem ra), even if true, to anyone who does not have a direct need to know for his or her own protection. In these ways, Judaism seeks to protect someone’s reputation and ability to support oneself.
The biblical story of Joseph (who winds up in jail for having spurned the advances of his boss’ wife) (Gen. 39:7-20) reminds us that mentally fragile or vindictive individuals can use a charge of sexual misconduct to get back at someone who is otherwise innocent. And sometimes one person’s kind act (for example, giving a congregant a hug in public) is inappropriately labeled by another as an act of sexual impropriety.
While I don’t agree with the use of the Internet to publicize unproven charges of sexual misconduct, I certainly understand why such postings happen: All too often victims find no support or redress in the organized Jewish world.
That is why it is our responsibility on every level of our community to establish protocols and procedures for dealing expeditiously and confidentially with charges of sexual misconduct, whether about rabbis, teachers, or other professionals and leaders, and in a way that is sensitive and fair to both parties.
In my synagogue we have a Personnel Committee staffed by volunteers with Equal Opportunity and human resource experience who regularly run training programs for all of our teachers and staff about sexual harassment and misconduct. Each of the major rabbinical organizations should have a similar procedure that ensures a fair hearing not just to the rabbi in question, but to the self-identified victim as well. I would also suggest that some of the national initiatives to train rabbis on issues of domestic violence could also include training in sexual harassment and impropriety so this growing number of concerned rabbis will know how to respond appropriately if someone comes to them for help.
Perhaps such steps, once in place, would vitiate the need for blogs that ultimately do more for the spread of lashon hara than the effective protection of potential victims of sexual misconduct.

Add to Newsvine
Add to StumbleUpon
Author, radio and TV talk show host, and President of CLAL-The National Jewish Center for Learning and Leadership, Brad Hirschfield is the author of 



I read the post of Rabbi Susan Grossman and all the comments with interest. I am an advocate for victims of rabbinic sexual misconduct and am actively working with several victims. I was a victim too and took my case to the CCAR. Of my experience with the Central Conference of American Rabbis (CCAR), the Committee on Ethic's and Appeals, chaired by Rabbi Rosalind Gold did a wonderful job with my case. They voted unanimously to censure my abuser, ordering him to undergo a complete psychological examination with therapy as appropriate. My abuser refused to go to a psychiatrist, appealed the censure and ultimately his friends on the Board of the CCAR reduced his censure to a letter of reprimand, that will sit in his file at the CCAR, unread by anyone. The letter of reprimand he was given protects no one. This is a "rabbi" who physically assaulted me when he discovered that I'd told another congregant, a friend of mine, what he'd done to me. This "rabbi", resigned from the shul where he abused me during the investigation of my case and started his own pastoral counseling practice, where he would have unlimited access to women - behind closed doors - with no supervision whatsoever. The Board of the CCAR, and then president Rabbi Janet Marder, miserably failed to uphold their sacred duty to keep the rabbinate safe. The CCAR Board makes every appearance of being a "Good Old Boys Club" whose primary objective is to protect the rabbi at the sacrifice of the victim, and all future victims of the abusive rabbi. There are some rabbi's who are trying to make a difference, among them, Rabbi Arthur Gross Schaefer, Rabbi Rosalind Gold and Rabbi Karen Fox - Reform - but they are few and far between. I decided to go to the press with my case and, Baruch Hashem, they published my story through the Jewish Telegraphic Agency - all over the U.S. and Europe, including Israel. I will never know if my stories prevented other women from being abused but I do know one thing - after the stories were published, my abuser stopped his pastoral counseling practice and is now concentrating on teaching. Baruch Hashem. The one reason why I went to the CCAR with my complaint in the first place was that I was told of another victim of his that sued, was paid off through the temple malpractice insurance and the victim was officially gagged as part of a settlement agreement. The shul's Board of Trustee's allowed the abusive rabbi to remain on the Bimah, where just 3 years later he abused me. I was able to say no to the affair he was pushing for, after groping me and emotionally abusing me but the damage to my spirituality was done. My soul was raped. I still cannot attend shul, 6 years later. My abuser touched me in inappropriate ways in front of my 7 year old daughter (who is now 13). She is now forever scarred by his abuse as well, and does not attend shul anymore either. She is still studying Hebrew with a private tutor but she will never have a temple ceremony for her Bat Mitzvah. Her memories of shul are now the memories of my abuse. Now you go ahead and tell me that when I share my story with other victims, I'm committing LaShon Hara? You tell me that by going to the press, and preventing my abuser to continue his pastoral "counseling", I committed LaShon Hara? You tell me that what I did was wrong. I did everything I could to prevent other victims. If my abusers victim that sued him had been allowed to go to the press, and if I'd read about this "rabbi", I most likely would not have become his next victim. I would have known what to look out for and I would NOT have trusted that man. So, you tell me I did the wrong thing - go ahead. Chavah | Homepage | 07.18.06 - 6:19 pm | # -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Name:
If there are any victim/survivors of rabbinic sexual misconduct reading this who need advocacy and support, please feel free to visit my blog and email me under my contact information. I will be there for you, just as others have been there for me. You are not alone. http://rabbinicsexualmisconductsurvivor.blogspot.com
I am so tired of the Jewish community using the prohibition against lashon hara to protect these most abhorrent criminals because, make no mistake about it, rabbis who commit acts of sexual misconduct with their congregants are criminals. Innocent people suffer and are traumatized while Jewish communities protect their clergy. So the message is to any sexually deviant Jewish man that the rabbinate offers the perfect career path because not only will he have unlimited access to vulnerable women and children but the Jewish community will sanction his behaviour and protect him, all under the guise of fear of lashon hara. Meanwhile they stand idly by while the victims suffer. What kind of an ethical standard is that? No wonder these men are so arrogant and convinced of their invincible power. They are given carte blanche to do what they will and their victims are re-victimized if they come forward. They are now accused of slander. Does anyone in the Jewish community care about the well-being of these vulnerable women and children, or is the image of the rabbinate all important? Must the show go on at all costs?
And what about the lashon hara committed by the rabbis and their supporters against the victims? No one seems to be too concerned about that. These men will do anything to prevent being exposed. This includes slandering and villifying their victims and trying to prevent them from attending their shuls. Once they have used up all the innocence and vulnerability they can in their victim, they want no reminders of their wrongdoing. So the victim is sent off into the proverbial wildnerness and the rabbi happily moves on to his next prey. Potential victims need to be warned about the red flags indicative of potential rabbi abusers. (1) If the rabbi seems too good to be true, he is. E.g., if he seems just unbelievably caring to vulnerable women (eg., those facing illness, grieving, divorce, single parenthood), it is not to be believed. This is not menschlekeit. This is not caring. This is stalking his prey. (2) If his past credentials include a lot of moves with no reasonable explanations for this, this is a red flag. Especially if his career track includes moves from high-paying, prestigious shuls in desirable geographic locales to lower paying, less prestigious shuls in less desirable locales. (3) If he held posts for long periods of time and left under mysterious circumstances (e.g., he says there was a difference of opinion but doesn't say exactly what it was), this is a warning sign that he is trying to hide something. (4) If he is knowledgeable about rabbinical sexual misconduct perpetrators but not about the victim advocacy network and who among his colleagues is an advocate, this is a danger signal. His interest is either because he is one of the perpetrators or because he wants to be an advocate. If he lacks awareness as to who among his colleagues is an advocate, this is not where his interest lies. May rabbinic sexual misconduct survivors move from strength to strength in supporting one another and in trying to help the perpetrators to do the right thing.
The internet can be utilized in order to attck in a kind of virtual terrorism against inoccent people too.