Virtual Talmud

The Limits of Identity

Thursday August 31, 2006

My friend Jenny Moyers is not the most connected Jew ever to walk the earth. She doesn’t belong to a synagogue and does not celebrate any of the Jewish holidays in her home. She seems to regard my rabbinic career path with something bordering between amusement and disdain.

So it came as something of a shock to me when one day we were walking together in the Philadelphia subway and a yellow-shirted Jews for Jesus missionary approached us to offer some literature. Jenny went completely ballistic and started yelling at him at the top of her voice, screaming that he ought to be ashamed of himself for calling himself a Jew. “Jews do not believe in Jesus!” she yelled. “What you are doing is disgraceful!” Needless to say, Jenny’s outburst made quite an impression on me, and it got me thinking.

Jews for Jesus push a lot of people’s buttons–even people who would otherwise not really care about Jewish tradition or practice–because they reside at the messy little intersection of identity and belief. For the most part, you can believe (or not believe) and do (or not do) whatever you want and still be Jewish. That’s because being Jewish isn’t a function of a particular belief or set of actions so much as it is a cultural, historic, and spiritual identity into which you are born or choose to convert. You’re just Jewish and, like Jenny, you don’t really need to worry about the particulars.

Jews for Jesus messes that all up.

If you really can believe whatever you want as a Jew, couldn’t you be Jewish and believe in Jesus? The answer is no, and I think it has less to do with theological objections–although these certainly exist–than it does with identity issues. For 2,000 years, at least in the West, Christians are what Jews defined themselves against. Oppressed, victimized, expelled, and slaughtered simply for who they were, Jews had their identity and outsider status reinforced over and over again. They were Other, and the oppressors were Christians.

The symbol of Christianity par excellence, the defining element, is Jesus. So to hear the words “Jew” and “Jesus” strung together into the phrase “Jews for Jesus” hits a very raw nerve for many Jews today–I imagine something akin to what Jews for Allah(!) would do to Jews who were oppressed in Islamic societies.

It’s not out of hatred of Jesus, or of Christians, or of Christianity, but rather as a reaction to hundreds of years of oppression. And for the many Jews like Jenny who don’t participate in Jewish life in any way, rejecting Jews for Jesus affirms their own bona fide Jewish identity. But, perhaps just as revealingly, the forceful reaction also acknowledges an underlying insecurity and doubt about whether you really can do or believe whatever you want and still be Jewish. Because the truth is, you can’t–there are some lines that just can’t be crossed.
Advertisement
Comments
Freddie Fish
September 14, 2006 8:58 PM
HASH(0x2142b7c0)

Hmmmm... Jenny Moyers seems to be a pretty average American- all beliefs are good and acceptable, but when Jesus crosses the radar suddenly the eyes go red and we start frothing at the mouth. Isn't that interesting. Seems the Biblical prediction of him being "a stumbling block to the Jews" was pretty darn accurate.

shelly
September 18, 2006 6:05 AM
HASH(0x2142de48)

Dear Freddie, Perhaps it is not Jesus himself that causes the reaction, but the way his name has been used all these may generations, and all the death and suffering that has been caused in his name.

Karin
September 19, 2006 6:26 AM
HASH(0x2142f00c)

Freddie, Interesting you should say "the eyes go red and we start frothing at the mouth. Are you including yourself as "we" with that image? Messianic?

Annonymous
September 20, 2006 6:51 PM
HASH(0x2142f1ec)

Of course he's not... it's like saying, "Aren't WE cranky today?" or "Aren't WE touchy today?" when all the time "we" has nothing to do with it.
That would be called a euphemism and not necessarily "dishonest or misleading." Of course, you may call it what you want, depending on how much negativity you want to hang on to.

T.G.
August 4, 2007 6:57 AM

What does it mean to attach oneself so intrinsically to a cultural, historical, and spiritual background that any suggestion you're something other than what you believe yourself to be is like an act of destruction? And perhaps something you're willing to die for as well?

Read All Comments

Advertisement

Search This Blog

About Virtual Talmud

This blog is no longer updated and is closed for comments. We welcome your comments about Judaism in our Judaism forums.

Brad Hirschfield currently blogs on Windows and Doors.

brad.jpg Author, radio and TV talk show host, and President of CLAL-The National Jewish Center for Learning and Leadership, Brad Hirschfield is the author of You Don’t Have To Be Wrong For Me To Be Right: Finding Faith Without Fanaticism. Listed as one of the nation’s 50 most influential rabbis in Newsweek, and a regular commentator on Court TV, he is the creator of the popular series, Building Bridges, airing on Bridges TV, and the co-host of the weekly radio show, Hirschfield and Kula.

More About Brad

radio.jpg
IntelligentTalkRadio.com
  clal.jpg
clal.org

book_rule.jpg

buybook.gif
  book_rule.jpg

buybook.gif

Advertisement

Advertisement


About Beliefnet

Our mission is to help people like you find, and walk, a spiritual path that will bring comfort, hope, clarity, strength, and happiness. More about Beliefnet.

Legal

Copyright © Beliefnet, Inc. and/or its licensors. All rights reserved. Use of this site is subject to Terms of Service and to our Privacy Policy. Constructed by Beliefnet.

Advertisement

Report as Inappropriate

You are reporting this content because it violates the Terms of Service.

All reported content is logged for investigation.