Windows and Doors

Windows and Doors

Hamas Theologians Have a Point

posted by Brad Hirschfield | 12:44pm Friday January 9, 2009

While it makes some people uncomfortable, the fact is that according to some readings of Islam, Israel’s existence does violate foundations of the faith both morally and theologically. Of course, it’s not the only reading of that tradition, but it’s one that can find plenty of textual support. Just as some readings of Judaism find support for treating all gentiles living in Israel as second-class citizens or justify Jews killing Jews over the return of settlements. So what? The faithful of every tradition have always found footnotes to justify what many of us would call their worst actions.
So yes, Hamas theologians have a point. As do the rabbis of radical messianic settlers. Pretending they do not, or that it is a willful mis-reading of the tradition, is absurd. The endless debates about what is “true Islam” or “true Judaism” are arrogant exercises in self-serving theology, which “prove” that the faith says what the speaker wants every time. It’s actually as dogmatic when done to prove that the faith is about peace and love as when it is done in the name of hate and war.
In each case, we are told that the faith means one thing and that all people who depart from that one understanding are not “real Muslims” or “real Jews”. It’s a dangerous form of apologetics which keep the faithful from taking appropriate responsibility for the damage done by members of their community.
Worst of all, raising the issue of such damage is quickly branded as Islamophobic or anti-Jewish. Sometimes it may be, but often it is not. And it is those who love a faith most deeply that must critique it most seriously and listen most attentively to the critique offered by others. That doesn’t mean those who critique you are always right, but if you think they are always wrong, it’s you who probably is.
The real question is not which positions are within the tradition and which are not.


The real question is how many believers stake their lives on any given position, how does their choice affect the lives of those who disagree, and are they willing to pay the price for the choices that they have made.
Israel’s stated goal, one which makes perfect sense to most people, is to lessen (forget about ending) the steady rain of rockets on Israeli civilians. But since the range of weapons flying out of Gaza has only increased in recent days, and the number of dead civilians is going up more quickly than the number of Hamas fighters killed, one wonders if this is the best way to achieve that goal.
Israel needs to assess the gap between fighting a war which seems, to me and many others, to be justified and whether or not that justified war will actually lead to its ultimate security. What alternatives might exist to this war which seems as much punitive as it is defensive. The two are not necessarily mutually exclusive. But they may be. And whether they are or not, needs to be asked again and again.
Hamas’ stated objective is the destruction of the State of Israel, a goal no longer shared even by most in the Arab world, witness the response of most Arab heads of state. They blame Israel for the proportionality of its response but admit that Hamas ended the cease fire and provoked this war with their endless missiles.
Does Hamas really think that Israel is going to allow itself to be destroyed in any case? It’s not going to happen. They need to ask themselves what they expect from a neighbor to whose annihilation they have committed themselves.
Having a theology that supports this position, or any other one like it, on either side of this conflict, is not the point — it’s not even something new. The will of God has been used as the ultimate trump card by Christians, Muslims, and Jews for years. The amazing thing is that we keep doing it despite the fact that using God that way, almost always renders everyone a loser!
This is not about what any tradition says. Our traditions are as much mirrors as they are guides. This is, as it always is, about the desires of those following the tradition.



Previous Posts

Apple's "Jew or Not Jew" App -- Should It Be Legal?
An Apple application that let users guess which French politicians or celebrities are Jewish was pulled from France's App Store. but its American equivalent is still available. French activist groups said the "Jew or Not Jew?" app violated bans on compiling information on people's religion and rev

posted 1:18:48am Sep. 18, 2011 | read full post »

Is God A Christian?
R. Kirby Godsey’s new book, Is God A Christian?, challenges what the author describes as the commonly held belief among many religious people that the God in whom they believe is “one of them”.  People, Mr. Kirby observes, too often confuse God’s religious identity with their own, leading t

posted 11:59:56am Sep. 12, 2011 | read full post »

Remembering 9/11 - Part One
The tenth anniversary of 9/11 brings up many emotions and presents some very real challenges, among them how to remember the past without being imprisoned by it.  This video, filmed at St. Paul's, the church closest to the World Trade Center site, is a wonderful example of rising to that challen

posted 2:40:58pm Sep. 08, 2011 | read full post »

Gilad Shalit, Still A Prisoner After 1,900 Days
Below is a copy of the Statement I got from the White House, and while I appreciate the words, I can't help but also ask, "Is this the best we can do?"  United States Mission to the United Nations Office of Press and Public Diplomacy 799 United Nations Plaza New York, NY 10017 (212) 41

posted 9:04:17am Sep. 08, 2011 | read full post »

Is Realty TV Really Kosher? The Ethics Of Realty TV
I know, at first it seems that ethics and reality TV are about as connected as fire and water – one being the antidote for the other.  But perhaps it’s not as simple as that, a conclusion supported by the recent spate of articles arguing that reality TV producers need to create, and commit, to

posted 6:34:55pm Sep. 07, 2011 | read full post »

Advertisement
Comments read comments(21)
post a comment
Steve

posted January 10, 2009 at 9:30 am


shouldn’t some readings be out of bounds in the civilized discourse, is everything fair game and entitled to be heard, or are readings which deny other people life and liberty just wrong.



report abuse
 

LINDA

posted January 10, 2009 at 10:37 am


WHEN MAN REALIZES THAT THERE IS ONLY ONE GOD AND THUS ONLY ONE RELIGION WHICH MERGES US TOGETHER INTO SUBMISSION TO BEHOLDING HIS CREATION WHETHER IT BE LAND, HIS FELLOW MAN, THE ENVIRONMENT, THEN WE WILL HAVE PEACE…NATIONALISM SHOULD BE REPLACED WITH HILLARY CLINTON’S IDEA OF THE WORLD AS A VILLAGE…I HOPE THIS CAT AND MOUSE GAME BETWEEN THE ISRAELIS AND THE PALESTINIANS AND LEBANESE WILL END WITH BOTH SIDES ADMITTING THEIR MISTAKES.



report abuse
 

Sharron Gorju

posted January 10, 2009 at 10:51 am


When people stop looking at each other as black, white, jew, german and etc they will then and only then realize we are the human race not just where they are from and what is their race we are male and female and that should be that. We should learn to all love one another help one another only then will we achieve I believe what God is expecting from us all. Even the bible says love thy neighbor as thy self.



report abuse
 

Sharron Gorju

posted January 10, 2009 at 10:58 am


We should learn to love one another as we are black,white,german,jew, french,etc when we learn to love one another and stop looking at where we are from and weather or not we are black white or anything else then and only then will we achieve what God expects us to do and that is to love thy neighbor as thyself. (BIBLE) That is the number one rule that will help us to get to heaven but a lot of people look at the past instead of forgiving and yes forgiving is hard to do but when we realize what it can do for us then we can live for the future and not the past.



report abuse
 

Thomas Beck

posted January 10, 2009 at 11:30 am


For just about the first time, I agree with almost everything Rabbi Hirschfield writes!
The question is not (or is not only), Israel’s right to defend itself, which nearly everyone would agree is absolute. The questions are, how does Israel go about defending itself, what else could it do, what hasn’t it tried yet, and what are the likely results of its actions? That Hamas does awful things is not in doubt; but no matter how intolerable its attacks on Israeli civilians, is it just to punish every Gazan in response? Hamas’s criminal attacks, however abominable, are not an existential threat to all of Israel, whereas Israel’s current actions are a dreadful humanitarian threat to just about the entirety of the population of Gaza. As a Jew, that strikes me as a violation of what I value most about being Jewish: that we care for everyone and that we always do the right thing, no matter what.
Again, this is not to be taken as my not supporting Israel; I think what Israel is doing now, not only is wrong but also WON’T WORK – that is, it will not produce the desired results. Which does not mean I have a solution that WILL work. But if you try something and it clearly doesn’t work – should you keep it up (even if it makes things worse) until you find something better? Especially since, while this war is ongoing, it’s almost impossible to have a rational discussion about what else might be tried.



report abuse
 

Ruvain

posted January 10, 2009 at 11:43 am


Man invented G-d and religion in order to achieve certain mundane objectives. The main ones were (1) psychological comfort and (2) social control.
Psychological: A belief in a Super Daddy in the sky who would take care of one’s tribe was comforting and Faith in pie in the sky upheld people’s spirits when they saw no logical reason to push on. Marx referred to this aspect of religion when he called it the opiate of the masses.
Control: If people belief that Super Daddy will see what they do and will punish them, it is easier to enforce social control. Otherwise, human life would be anarchy.
Thus, men create the religion that satisfies their needs. If you suffer from a Paranoid Personality Disorder, you are likely to gravitate to a religion that re-enforces your feelings of grandiosity by saying that your alone has the One Truth.
Other people are centered on personal and societal improvements. Calvinists, for example, have a belief system that requires them to work hard to provide for their families while making significant contributions to society. The system is very similar to doing Mitzvot and Hillel’s Three Questions.



report abuse
 

Scott

posted January 10, 2009 at 2:12 pm


Israel was foolish to agree to these silly three hour cease fires without getting something in return. Israel should have demanded one missile launcher for each hour. If the humanitarian need is real, then Hamas would give over the missile launchers. Each missile launcher which Hamas gave up would be one less launcher for the IDF to find and that would reduce civilian and Hamas casualties. Hamas does not need any missile launchers as they serve not bona fide military purpose. They are solely items of terror.
I agree that Olmert is a weak man; we learned this fact 2 and 1/2 years ago. Without denying the problems with Hamas, Israel has far more serious internal problems, otherwise this dithering, ineffectual idiot would have been out of the government a long time ago. All Olmert knows is to talk loud and surrender.



report abuse
 

Scott

posted January 10, 2009 at 2:46 pm


From what I hear from young Israelis who have come to the US, the problem is not the Arabs, but the corruption and incompetence in Israeli society as exemplified by Olmert. They say they left Israel because the corruption and incompetence made it impossible for them.
The so-called Humanitarian problem in Gaza is not the fault of the Israelis as Hamas follows the tried and true tactic of Death by Israeli — force Israel to defend itself and then cause as many civilian casualties as possible — also lie about the number of injuries and pretend that dead terrorists were innocent civilians. We all know that the world loves this game where it exhibits its hypocritical moral righteousness knowing that the more it blames Israel for Hamas’ action, the more Arab deaths the West is creating.
Only an corrupt and incompetent government, however, would fail to prepare for the real war — which is as much military as public relations. In the public relations war, Olmert’s troika of incompetence gets a F-. Corruption and incompetence tend to go hand in hand. Corrupt people avoid merit preferring to select people on the basis of bribery and political favors. People who have the most to contribute based on natural talent and hard work are shut out and they go elsewhere, e.g. my young Israeli friends starting businesses in USA.
The incompetent Olmert regime has done nothing in the very real PR war. For example, since more Israelis died of natural heart attacks than died from Hamas rockets, why is Israel killing so many Palestinians? It would have been cheaper to distribute more heart defrib’s in southern Israel. Is an Israeli dead by a heart attack any less dead than an Israel dead by a rocket? Of course, there are answers, but Olmert surrendered in the PR war before it began.
The incompetent Olmert regime treats the reasons for the incursion a state secret. can anyone point to a rational connection between what the IDF has done and stopping the Hamas rockets? Of course, there are answers, but Olmert surrendered in the PR war before it began.
The incompetent Olmert regime’s perchance for surrender. Who can support Israel when at any moment Olmert may surrender? As we learned in 2006, Olmert is always ready to give up, under the delusion that people are too stupid to realize that what he calls a “cease fire” is actually a surrender.
The incompetent Olmert regime did not ask for a single missile launcher in return for the 3 hour cease fires. If he had asked, Hamas would have been forced to either refuse or produce a launcher. Instead Olmert acts as if Israel and Israel alone has caused a humanitarian disaster, and thus, Israel has to make 100% of the concessions to rectify the humanitarian disaster.
Israel could have offered to escort medical supplies medical supplies. Since Israel knows where it will bomb, it could avoid bombing itself. Also, it would have helped if Israel had made certain the world saw all the medical supplies waiting at the Rafa Crossing which Hamas was refusing to pick up in order to leave the hospitals without supplies for propaganda purposes.
The instances of the the Olmert regime’s incompetence equal the number of Hamas’ rockets and missile and Olmert is far more lethal to Israel’s existence than Hamas.
Why would any Israeli vote for Olmert II (Tzipi Livni) in the February 2009 elections? The colossal incompetence in the Gaza War shows why Olmert’s regime, whether it is headed by Olmert or Livni, is more deadly to Israel than to Hamas. The only factor that gives the Olmert regime any back bone is Bibi Netanyahu’s waiting in the wings.



report abuse
 

Leann

posted January 10, 2009 at 4:26 pm


What is a Hamas theologian?? It sounds oxymoronic to me.



report abuse
 

Pavvel

posted January 10, 2009 at 6:04 pm


Leann,
There is nothing oxymoronic about any type of theologian. Some theologians may show themselves as evil or as plain morons but never as “oxymorons.” Even the most immoral, the most unethical group will have its theologians to ground their immoral or unethical acts in their shared beliefs.
Peace,
Pavvel



report abuse
 

Joe

posted January 10, 2009 at 7:00 pm


B-H
How dare you term Jews in the “territories” as “Messianic settlers,” auotmatically labeling them as fanatics.
Israel never had plans to capture the terroritories, but was forced to go to war against massive army buildups in Egypt, Lebanon, Jordan and Syria in 1966-67. Rabid heads of state in those countries were screaming “Death to the Jews!” and “We will destroy Israel…”
Had they accepted the 1947 UN mandate, there never would have been a ’67 war. And, the territories captured included Jewish holy sites which Arabs had previously forbidden Jews to visit, including the Kotel, Hebron, etc.
The “messianic settlers” are sincere Jews who want to be able to live their lives in Jewish holy places, which does madden the Palestinians, whose leader spent part of WWII in Berlin planning deportation of Jews from the Holy Land to eastern Europe for extermination.
Jewish blood isn’t cheap any more, we have every right to our holy sites as Muslims and Christians, and they have no right to deny us access to our holy sites, or our lives.
Let them compromise half as much as Israel does, and there will be peace.



report abuse
 

Your Name

posted January 10, 2009 at 10:15 pm


I am a Christian Zionist and stand with Israel . I am amazed at the attitude of the nations. Who could possibly stand carelessly by while their citizens are constantly bonbarded and threatened with suicide murderers . It is not surprising that religionist can find an excuse to hate in whatever faith they propose. More people have been unjustly killed , tortured , and maimed in the name of G-D . In the case of Christianity and Jdudaism there is no doubt these people have not followed the teaching of Moses or Jesus , but their own lusts and desires. I would like a Muslim to condemm these acts of hate and tell me these terrorists do not follow their founder .



report abuse
 

Robert

posted January 11, 2009 at 1:43 am


“The ‘messianic settlers’ are sincere Jews who want to be able to live their lives in Jewish holy places, which does madden the Palestinians, whose leader spent part of WWII in Berlin planning deportation of Jews from the Holy Land to eastern Europe for extermination.”
Whoa. That Palestinian leader must be one really old man by now. I wonder how he keeps running fast enough to avoid getting hit by the rockets lately.
And that’s indicative of the problem. Israelis and Palestinians both can point to outrages. And their leaders have no way to lead except by invoking outrage and creating even more outrage. Both sides are utter masters at this, the Palestinian side, master of nothing else, but the same approach is used by both parties and it is far past time for the US to stop tolerating either of them.
Should Jews live in “holy places?” I cannot answer that question, but it does strike as odd that the deity could only make a certain few places holy and that maybe living by higher morality (we won’t go all Christian and call it “love,” but at least mercy, justice, and humility) might be what makes a land holy. Do you suppose?



report abuse
 

Robert

posted January 11, 2009 at 1:46 am


“I would like a Muslim to condemm these acts of hate and tell me these terrorists do not follow their founder.”
Really? Why? Are you considering converting to become a Mohammedan? Why impose your standards for a consistent theology on someone else? Isn’t it enough just to stop shooting the damned missiles at Israel? Call me an incrementalist.



report abuse
 

Your Name

posted January 11, 2009 at 9:57 am


I have a shop in a rural community, where there are very few Jews. Two years ago an Imam lived in the apartment above my shop. Again, very few Muslims live here: He was a rural prison chaplain. We conversed when business was slow, and agreed that the resolution of the Middle East conflict was so simple that none would ever choose to see it: The children of Abraham are Jews and Muslims, and should both be equally permitted to live and worship in Israel. Israel should remain under Jewish rule, but should be charged with the loving care and respect of its Muslim citizens. Of course, Muslims would be free to relocate if they so chose, and immigration would be restrictive. But as cousins, courtesy and hospitality would be appropriate. And, of course, no other countries are expected to return lands acquired through war: It is how the United States gained land, and inequitable rules should not be applied to Israel.



report abuse
 

Your Name

posted January 11, 2009 at 1:18 pm


Jews are losing the public relations war. I cannot believe the lack of savvy and acumen Jewish politicians are displaying in dealing with the media.
Where are the comparisons between Hamas’ Qassam rockets and the V-2s of the Nazis, or the comparisons between Hamas and the Nazis themselves? After all, which OTHER group dedicated itself to the destruction of Jews, and which OTHER group brought destruction upon its innocent citizens because of its aggression toward others? Just as the Nazis’ aggression prompted the fire bombing of Dresden, so does Hamas’ aggression prompt the shelling and bombing of Gaza.
You need to get off your asses and you need to give “what for” to those liberal Jews who are betraying their own ethnicity and homeland. If you lose against Hamas, it’s because you chose defeat over victory.



report abuse
 

J.Kravette

posted January 11, 2009 at 1:26 pm


Dear Ruvain,
I am curious as to what you actually believe in,as I don’t want to assume anything,but by your comments I take it you don’t believe in The Creator,which you refer to as “super daddy”. Before I start a dialogue with you I first must understand your thoughts on (1)The Bible and (2) the One who inspired it.
Looking forward to your response,
Jay



report abuse
 

Ruvain

posted January 11, 2009 at 5:48 pm


Dear J.Kravette,
I think my comments speak for themselves. If you want commentary, I point to the Shema.
Ruvain



report abuse
 

LEANN

posted January 12, 2009 at 11:59 am


What is a Hamas “theologian”?? That seems like an oxymoron to me!



report abuse
 

Alex Nodopaka

posted January 12, 2009 at 1:10 pm


It is an old well-known fact that an innocent individual can be convicted of any crime by a series of pre-arranged yes & no answer questions… which means any debate is inconclusive but by self-conviction.



report abuse
 

J.Kravette

posted January 12, 2009 at 5:02 pm


Dear Ruvain,
Thank you for your response, but please indulge me as I didn’t quite get your point. Are you referring to the” Shema Yisroal Adenoi Elohenu Adenoi Echad”?
J



report abuse
 

Post a Comment

By submitting these comments, I agree to the beliefnet.com terms of service, rules of conduct and privacy policy (the "agreements"). I understand and agree that any content I post is licensed to beliefnet.com and may be used by beliefnet.com in accordance with the agreements.

Share this story


About Beliefnet

Our mission is to help people like you find, and walk, a spiritual path that will bring comfort, hope, clarity, strength, and happiness. More about Beliefnet.

Help

Media Kit

Subscribe

Legal

Copyright © Beliefnet, Inc. and/or its licensors. All rights reserved. Use of this site is subject to Terms of Service and to our Privacy Policy. Constructed by Beliefnet.

Advertisement

Report as Inappropriate

You are reporting this content because it violates the Terms of Service.

All reported content is logged for investigation.