With Purim only a week away, Rabbis are coming out of the woodwork with rulings on a whole variety of issues relating to the full and proper observance of the day. But none have made the news as prominently as Israel’s (the world’s?) leading Sephardic jurist/halakhist, Rabbi Ovadia Yosef. When this sage, commonly known as Rav Ovadia, speaks, its news. This past Saturday night was no exception. That’s why his comments in a lecture about how to read the Megillah (Biblical Book of Esther) made all of the Israeli papers on Sunday.
What did he say that was so newsworthy? That Women, under limited circumstances, could read the scroll for both men and women, and that such a reading would allow both to fulfill their obligation to hear the scroll read on Purim. This ruling will surely have most people horrified that such a debate is even happening in the 21st century. And it will leave a minority of others equally horrified at what they deem to be the rabbi’s departure from the correct interpretation of the law which, in their eyes, prohibits women from taking such public religious leadership roles.
The debate among a group of my own friends mirrors that reality perfectly. And it points the way to considering how endless debate about doctrine divides people from each other at just the moments that they should be coming together. This trend in religion is hardly new or unique to Judaism. But in a world of increasing divisiveness, often using religious difference for cover, this story provides a good opportunity to heal what hurts so many people – the use of religion to prove ourselves right, instead of empowering us to be more caring and loving toward others.
One of the parties to the debate commented that the reason why it has taken so long for Orthodox authorities like Rabbi Yosef Karo, upon whom Rav Ovadia relies in on order to reach this conclusion, is that in general, Jewish law seeks to “keep its foot on women’s necks”.
And before anyone either cheers or jeers at that formulation, let’s ask why we need to make ugly assumptions about those with whom we disagree, in order to bolster our own position. That, more than any given conclusion which any community reaches, is what demeans the entire religious apparatus.
Let me be clear: I was not waiting for this Rabbis ruling, even though I am an Orthodox rabbi. In fact, our eldest daughter’s Bat Mitzvah, three Purims ago, was centered on her reading of the Megillah for both men and women. And in the interest of full disclosure, my own brother went to an earlier service before attending the Bat Mitzvah because he did not accept the permissibility of her reading for him.
Was it a problem? Not for us. That’s what it means to believe that good people can disagree about how to practice their faith without resorting to claims about either misogyny or the abandonment of the tradition. Why do we need to unfairly denigrate those who came before us, or currently differ from us, in order to shore up the positions we take?
Nobody wants to admit that we all go shopping for the footnotes we need to meet the religious posture with which we can live. That’s actually what binds us together and realizing that could provide incredible social and religious cohesion in the face of the widely divergent practices which are never going away. If everybody were honest about that and could maintain that honesty without becoming cynical about it, we would all be a great deal better off.
In other words, stop bickering, wish each other a happy Purim, tell the story, eat a good meal with friends, get a little wasted and take care of those w/o the means to accomplish those things (all practices associated with the full observance of the holiday). Everyone from Reform leader, Rabbi Eric Yoffe to Rav Ovadiah could live with that. So should we.



Author, radio and TV talk show host, and President of CLAL-The National Jewish Center for Learning and Leadership, Brad Hirschfield is the author of 



posted March 5, 2009 at 10:31 am
I am surprised at the “controversy”
for another reason. This matter appears to
be clearly explicated in Shulkhan Aruch.
Over there, we find that R. Yosef Karo
(whose ruling is almost always accepted as
definitive for Sephardic Jewry) appears to
be quite clear that a woman can “read
Megilla” for Men.
However, Rama (whose ruling is normally
considered definitive for Ashkenazic Jewry)
cites the opinion [aleady cited in Tosaphot
earlier] that there was an opinion dating
from the time of the B’hag that women can NOT
“read Megilla” for men.
Since Rav Ovadiah SHLI”TA is SEPHARDIC, it
should not be a surprise that he ruled in
accordance wth R. Karo. However, given
that you (Rabbi Brad) claim to be Orthodox
and (apparently) following Ashkenazic
Orthodoxy – it is pretty mystifying as to
the basis for permitting your daughter to
“read Megilla”… Your brother’s behavior
is certainly understandable. As an Ashkenazi
Jew, he seeks to follow Ashkenazi practice….
which questions (based upon B’hag) as to whether
a woman can “read Megilla” for men….
posted March 5, 2009 at 6:17 pm
Logic cringes. A text commemorating the heroic deeds of a selfless FEMALE should be read by only a man? A FEMALE who in essence held the fate of a people in her hands and the risk she took with her subsequent actions? As a Jewish woman I’m at a loss to understand the prohibition, other than that fear exists concerning a woman’s selflessness and courage in the face of overwhelming odds. She is a hero–a female hero of biblical proportions and as such deserves a female voice reading her story as well a males.
posted March 6, 2009 at 12:13 pm
Now we understand why your “cousins” are so extreme. You have come
out and modified most of your views on women, but some things are too much of a grit in the craw situation to modernize – even for you who have been, many times, trendsetters in everything else.
Let me get this straight, so you read the Book of Esther, who became the hero for the Israelites for saving them, and a woman (I suppose Esther was a woman, indeed), is not supposed to read to men? That is laughable.
posted March 8, 2009 at 3:48 pm
If women are discouraged from reading the religious scriptures in public and should refer to the men for that role, then how will the
next generation of Jews produce Esthers? Women can often have influence in situtions and circumstances that men cannot (as was the case with Esther). The sacred role of an agent to save the Jews at the time of Ester was not given to the highest Rabbi. The King would not have listened to a Rabbi’s argument. Given a women’s intuition
and beauty combined with an understanding of her divine role,
actually saved the nation! I understand 100% why women are discouraged from public roles of religious authority. Give them the
opportunity to voice their opinions publicly, (like here) and
if a few of them are of like mind, they might just organize, have an influence on the people, and divert the power from the “CHOSEN” authorities. I mean no disrespect to those of conservative views
or those who have spent thier lifetime studying the scriptures
for the purpose of the community service. I only wonder if what is in
the highest service to the community, is to offer women the opportunity to mentor other women and see themselves having an equally
divine role in the continuation and preservation of the religion & culture.