Members of the National Socialist Movement, a neo-Nazi group, not only participate in the Missouri Department of Transportation's Adopt-a-Highway program, but have named a stretch of the road, which they spend a few hours each month cleaning, in honor of their group. And in recognition of their volunteer effort, the state put up a sign on the road which acknowledges the group and its effort in this area. It's not the first time this has been done, either.
In Kentucky, the National Alliance, another hate group adopted a highway and named it after William Pierce, author of the "The Turner Diaries", a perennial favorite among dangerous lunatics including Oklahoma City bomber, Timothy McVeigh. And in St. Louis, the Ku Klux Klan also adopted a stretch of road. In that case, after losing a court battle to end their sponsorship, the DOT renamed the Klan-adopted road, Rosa Parks Highway and put a sign to that effect alongside the one acknowledging the Klan.
Now the state is planning to rename the road adopted by the National Socialists in honor of Rabbi Abraham Joshua Heschel, the world renowned theologian and civil rights activist. Considering the money saved by the government because of the volunteer efforts of these hate groups, is it really fair to rename the highways they adopt after people whose life work they diametrically oppose?
Absolutely, it is. And for the same reason that these organizations have every right to adopt these highways and have their groups acknowledged for so doing.
The acknowledgment which the group gets is in direct proportion to the contribution which they make in time and energy to the entire public. That good work deserves to be acknowledged. They do not insist that the roads upon which they work serve only white people, for example, and to devalue their commitment and effort would be wrong.
Likewise, the state has a right to acknowledge the civic pride felt because of the efforts of brave women like Rosa Parks, and brilliant thinkers like Rabbi Heschel. If the hate groups object to having their names appear in conjunction with blacks and Jews, they are free to stop volunteering and just as free to give up the publicity which their volunteer work merits.
This balance works for at least three other important reasons. First, it undermines the notion that people we don't like are incapable of doing things that we do. The world is not simply divided between those whose thoughts and actions are good and those whose thoughts and actions are bad. It might make us comfortable to think this way but it isn't true and such thinking rarely makes us any safer no matter how much some people claim it does.
Second, the response to bad speech must be more speech, at least as much as possible. As long as the message they put on their signs is not overtly hateful, what we would lose by constraining the freedom of expression for groups like the ones already mentioned, is far greater than that which we would gain from so doing. If the thought and deeds of people like Parks and Heschel are truly good, and they are, their names will stand up well when placed alongside the names of groups like the Klan and the National Socialist Movement.
Third, there may be some real long-term benefit in having the members of groups which are deeply committed to the destruction of what most of us hold dear, engaged with public welfare work. By continuing to serve the state, the members of these groups create relationships with the very governments which they usually portray as "out to get them".
Whether they like it or not, whether they tell their kids that it's just the price they pay for the free publicity, the bottom line remains that they are serving the state which they claim to oppose. That kind of engagement makes it increasingly difficult to see one's self as disconnected from the larger culture. And given the role of alienation in nurturing the identity of hate-group members, that's a very good thing.
So we see them a bit more realistically, even if their views remain ugly and potentially dangerous, and they see the rest of us as more connected to them than they would ever care to admit. If that's the result of hate groups adopting highways, which are then named after heroes of racial and ethnic healing, it's actually not such a bad idea.
Add to Del.icio.us
Add to Technorati
Add to Digg
Add to Newsvine
Add to Facebook
Add to StumbleUpon
Subscribe
Author, radio and TV talk show host, and President of CLAL-The National Jewish Center for Learning and Leadership, Brad Hirschfield is the author of 
That's a new way of looking at the issue!
The first time I saw a KKK Adopt-a-Highway sign I did a double take. In was in northern Arkansas, home to many "tax protesters" and other conspiracy theorists. It's ironic really, seeing these people engaged in a society they claim to want no part of.
Rabbi, taking your position to ridiculous extremes, you no doubt would agree that is acceptable to name a road being maintained by Temple Beth XYZ "The Adolph Eichman Memorial Parkway".
It is always strange when a group dedicated to bigotry and hate does something good. Yet, many members of these groups acutually consider themselves good people. I have a friend who is honest, hard-working, kind to animals, and shockingly racist. She knows I am Jewish, but that does not seem to bother her, since I look "like a regular white person." The things she says about African-Americans or Latinos shock me. I've tried to point out some of the wonderful people we actually know who are members of those groups but she does not seem to "get it." It is so deeply ingrained in her that she acutally used the expression "Jew him down" while talking to me.
I hope that in participating in the community, and being exposed to others, some of these bigots' children develop different attitudes. That is our best hope.
Post a Comment
By submitting these comments, I agree to the beliefnet.com terms of service, rules of conduct and privacy policy (the "agreements"). I understand and agree that any content I post is licensed to beliefnet.com and may be used by beliefnet.com in accordance with the agreements.