John Allen Muhammad, known as the D.C. Sniper, will be executed tonight in Virginia. Muhammad, along with his protégé Lee Boyd Malvo, murdered 10 and terrorized millions for weeks, until he was captured in the fall of 2004. And when he dies tonight, there will likely be those outside the prison cheering the fact that "he's getting what he deserves" and an equal number of people protesting his "murder" by the state.
Are either of them right? Is there a Jewish approach to the death penalty? The short answers are, respectively, no and yes.
From a Jewish perspective, those who cheer the justice that Mr. Muhammad will receive through the tip of a needle are potentially correct about this being what he deserves. They are however almost certainly wrong that he should get it. Jewish tradition is not shy about declaring that many transgressions are deserving of the death penalty, but is equally powerful in its stance against its being carried out.
Despite the Hebrew Bible's teaching that many acts (and I mention these, in this context, as examples for historical purposes only) ranging from murder to witchcraft, and adultery to homosexuality, merit death at the hands of the court, there is only one case of a person being executed in the entire Five Books of Moses. The rabbis of the Mishnah (Makkot 1:10) teach that a court which executes even once in seven years is a "terrorist court", and according to Rabbi Eliezer ben Azariah, the number is once in seventy years.
Even more interestingly, the rabbis teach in the tractate Sanhedrin, that a unanimous court can not impose the death penalty. That's right, the only court which is absolutely prohibited from carrying out a death sentence is the one which most of us assume is the one which should i.e. one in which all judges agree that it's the right thing to do.
The rabbis accept that there may be times when it has to happen, but can not accept that any decision so momentous and complex should be seen the same way by everybody. If that happens, the rabbis tell us, we must be missing something and therefore can not execute the offender. Moreover, the system described by the rabbis makes it impossible to hide behind popular opinion.
The judges who vote for execution stand alongside those who vote against it and, because they will continue to work together, must acknowledge that among those they respect are people who think that they were dead wrong about the conclusion which they reached. Can the same be said about either group which will be outside the prison tonight?
Will either group admit the partial truth, or potential truth, embedded in the ideas of the group they oppose? If not, we are likely to continue ping-pong'ing along as a nation divided between two opposing groups, neither of whom can address the real issues of justice and compassion and how a legal system must hold those values in relationship.
Overwhelmingly, Jewish tradition seems to value the idea of the death penalty as a moral statement, even as it resists its imposition on ethical grounds. While that might not be the position we should adopt as a nation, it's surely an interesting basis upon which to talk about what will happen to John Muhammad at nine tonight.
Add to Del.icio.us
Add to Technorati
Add to Digg
Add to Newsvine
Add to Facebook
Add to StumbleUpon
Subscribe
Author, radio and TV talk show host, and President of CLAL-The National Jewish Center for Learning and Leadership, Brad Hirschfield is the author of 
If there was ever a case for capital punishment it was his. To "execute" people for the thrill day in and day out. His victims were mothers and fathers, husbands and wifes, sons and daughters who did nothing but fill up at a gas station or walk in a park. I retired after 28 years in law enforcement and handled cases where boyfriends killed the girlfriends, husband killed wifes and a man killed his child and many more....All of those terrible murders that I handled were sad and a waste but other than the childs case they were crimes "of Passion" or drugs. The people who did those crimes paid with prision and some died in prison but I man like this guy does not deserve prison or rehab. He killed because he liked it.
We sometimes have to decide what is best to protect our children and our family and sad as it is to not us that put him to death.....he did..I dont judge him, thats up to god but we now longer have to fear him...maybe others but no him...
okay stupid page, let see if it will work this time.. and i did lose all my information on what I had Type.. THANKS..
I am not for the Death Penalty never have been, I dont think it is right for out country to even think about bringing back such a horrible crime and means of torture. Let the person Rott forever in jail this way it lets them think about the crime they have committed. And they can spend their miserible life in jail, although my belief is that no matter what the crime is that a person has done it not bad enough to take a person's life. Granted i do understand the many levels of a crime, but let them rott in jail and make their inmates lives worse or be punish by their inmates. I think the country should forbid the Dealth Penaly Forever and not for while and then bring it back, or only in some states allowed, which is not right. The Death Penalty Should Be BANNED From all 50 states for once and for all!
He should be dead and he is.
It should be noted that the dead do not kill again.
Gavriella
So then, what does this mean, "You shall live by them, but you shall not die because of them." (Babylonian Talmud, Yoma 85b)
Post a Comment
By submitting these comments, I agree to the beliefnet.com terms of service, rules of conduct and privacy policy (the "agreements"). I understand and agree that any content I post is licensed to beliefnet.com and may be used by beliefnet.com in accordance with the agreements.