The Board of Education for the State of Texas enters the second of a three-day meeting devoted to the state’s social studies curriculum which includes U.S. history, government and much more. As the nation’s second largest purchaser of public school textbooks, what gets decided in Texas actually effects many of the rest of us, regardless of the state in which we live. A big percentage of what is being debated is how much the curricula and the text books which are used should reflect the “Christian roots” of our nation and the Christian faith of our nation’s majority.
The effort to move things in that direction is being led by advocates who not only want to see a greater appreciation of the role faith played in the story of our nation’s founding, and many important moments since. It seems they want nothing less than curricula which tell students who God is, which side “He” is on and how we are all doomed if we don’t subscribe to particular beliefs. Forget crossing over the line; these folks don’t even acknowledge that the line exists.
But I really don’t blame religious zealots like Rev. Peter Marshall and David Barton, both of whom sat on the state’s curriculum advisory panel. They are only doing what they think is best from the perspective of their particular theologies. They are evangelists and they are evangelizing — that’s what they do.
I blame the public officials who invited the participation of evangelists in a process which is meant to respect the ideas and needs of the larger public. These officials abandoned the public they are charged with serving, to advocate for their own religious world views and that is a complete failure of leadership for which they should be held accountable.
The issue is not whether they are entitled to their views or to advocate for them. But when public officials knowingly choose polarizing pastors to participate in setting public policy, they are worse than the pastors behind whom they hide. They willfully create havoc from which little good can emerge other than the thrashing of any citizens who oppose them. And, ironically, that is precisely what they believe a previous generation of secularists did to them, and to public school curricula, so they should know better!
I am also concerned about political advocacy groups like the Liberty Institute, which poisons the debate with purposefully provocative language which needlessly inflames an already combustible situation.
It’s not that I mind controversy, but is anyone really well-served by the kind of comments made by Liberty’s legislative director, who said, “Texas teachers and parents have had enough of liberal fringe groups trying to radically change and rewrite American history. This liberal effort to infiltrate, indoctrinate, and saturate our students’ schools with extreme liberal ideology will fail.”
They may win this round with that kind of language, but in the end, we will all lose when decisions are reached because one side was more effective at fanning the public’s fears and resentments. Most Americans are somewhere in the middle on this issue, as we are on most of the so-called hot button issues.
We know, even if we are believers, that there is a difference between teaching about the history of religion in America and preaching the Gospel to a captive audience of children in our nation’s classrooms. Most people would like to see the former and reject the latter. But they need leaders who will advocate for that sane middle ground which neither turns teachers into preachers nor ignores the role of religion in general or Christianity in particular, as crucial to our shared history.
That history should be explored in the classroom as just that, history, not theology or religious practice. Students should know that among the founding fathers there were men of deeply traditional faith and that without their faith they would have accomplished far less. There were also deists who had no use for organized religion at all. There were people who believed that God ordained the keeping of slaves and the oppression of women, and others who understood that such actions were truly sinful.
Religion has animated many causes in our nation’s history and our children are entitled to hear the entire story in all its complexity. That is what it means to study the history of religion and its influence in America, which we should do, and not teach either theology or devotional religion in our public schools — which, the last time I checked, was against the law.



Author, radio and TV talk show host, and President of CLAL-The National Jewish Center for Learning and Leadership, Brad Hirschfield is the author of 



posted March 11, 2010 at 12:28 pm
“But I really don’t blame religious zealots like Rev. Peter Marshall and David Barton, both of whom sat on the state’s curriculum advisory panel. They are only doing what they think is best from the perspective of their particular theologies. They are evangelists and they are evangelizing — that’s what they do.”
But you really should be “blaming [these] religious zealots” – exactly BECAUSE they are “evangelizing”! Explain why their ‘beliefs’ should be imposed into school texts and curricula? What on earth has religion to do with public (i.e. secular) schools.
You let them off way too easy.
You are right to “blame the public officials who invited the participation of evangelists in a process which is meant to respect the ideas and needs of the larger public” though. Trouble is, you’ll hear a never-ending chorus of “Let the people decide”.
Help get people’s faith/beliefs out of the public education system.
posted March 11, 2010 at 12:41 pm
David Klinghoffer FULLY supports Marshall and Barton in asserting that
“text books which are used should reflect the “Christian roots” of our nation and the Christian faith of our nation’s majority.”
posted March 11, 2010 at 2:16 pm
All of this philosophy aside – the deeper problem is the continual use of textBOOKS. With the proliferation of the internet and all the resources it provides, bound paper tomes that threaten the health or students backs are soon to be ineffective and passe. It is time to realize that one central authority – in print or in life – is not on anyone;s best interests. Perhaps it is best to help teach the students to think and evaluate for themselves.
This is a call for a new educational paradigm! That of course means it will be ignored. But isn’t it sad to be exhausting all this time (and eventually all this money!) on a model that is more than a century old and no longer appropriate for the contemporary situation?
posted March 11, 2010 at 5:19 pm
Totally agree with you Rabbi, if only we had more level headed people making such decisions. The world needs more Rabbi Hirschfield’s.
posted March 12, 2010 at 11:09 am
I completely agree with you, Rabbi. Whatever happened to the separation of church and state that our founding fathers designed into the Constitution? I believe that these religious people (of any denomination, buy the way) need to stay out of the discussion of what is to be written into textbooks and taught to students. I believe we’ve gone through this issue several times before; for example, when other minority religious groups have brought lawsuits against their children being forced to accept another religion’s dogma and so on over their own.
The Constitution makes this very clear. Separation of church and state is firmly stated. But ever since the first Bush administration religion has been creeping over the line, and has now entered government in full force. Something must be done to prevent any one religion from dominating our government and its principles.
posted March 12, 2010 at 11:13 am
Thank you for sharing your thoughts on this issue.
I don’t have a problem with religious history being taught in schools. I myself have taught classes on religious diversity to high school students to foster an understanding of the different faiths that make up the American religious landscape, in hopes of promoting something closer to true tolerance and acceptance.
But as you’ve rightly pointed out, “There is a difference between teaching about the history of religion in America and preaching the Gospel to a captive audience of children in our nation’s classrooms.”
Has the Texas Board of Education forgotten about the separation of church and state? The first amendment protects freedom of religion — rather than freedom *from* religion — and unless Texas is prepared to include in their public classrooms religious instruction from every faith tradition, the Board might want to step back and re-think whether preaching has a place in public schools.
Religion is — and should — be a matter of personal and familial choice. If parents want their children to have religious instruction, that’s their responsibility, not the Texas Board of Education’s prerogative.
Or perhaps this is a deliberately provocative effort. Is the Texas board is spoiling for a fight, all the way to the Supreme Court?
posted March 12, 2010 at 11:16 am
On the one hand, I don’t think they should evangelize in textbooks, on the other hand, that is already being done in our classrooms from those on the left. There is a clear bias in most textbooks in the schools today. We can’t exclude the words of Thomas Jefferson (or any of the founding fathers) from history books, just because his words don’t fit the political agenda of those on education boards across the country. There needs to be a balance of some sort.
Also, religion played an important role in the founding of this country, and if that can’t be discussed then we are rewriting the history of this great country. The role it played may not be the role portrayed in the textbooks you are talking about, but it’s also not the role it played in the current textbooks. There must be some middle ground between the religious right who would paint this country as a christian theocracy and the liberal left who would paint it as a socialist / humanistic society.
Would you ever see these words of George Washinton’s farewell address in a liberal history book:
“Let it simply be asked where is the security for prosperity, for reputation, for life; if the sense of religious obligation desert the oaths, which are the instruments of investigation in the Courts of Justice? And let us with caution indulge the supposition, that morality can be maintained without religion”
– George Washington
[Farewell Address to the Nation, September 19, 1796]
Or these words:
“It is impossible to rightly govern the world without God and the Bible.
–George Washington
There are many other examples and we can’t just ignore them if we are going to paint a true picture of this country’s history.
posted March 12, 2010 at 2:55 pm
Would you ever see these words of George Washinton’s farewell address in a liberal history book: “”Let it simply be asked where is the security for prosperity, for reputation, for life; if the sense of religious obligation desert the oaths, which are the instruments of investigation in the Courts of Justice? And let us with caution indulge the supposition, that morality can be maintained without religion”
– George Washington
[Farewell Address to the Nation, September 19, 1796]”
Houghton-Mifflin has this in several of the history text books used in our school. Perhaps if you would actually get out and look at the books being used in school instead of sipping the kool-aid offered by the ignorant fools on the right you would find that many of their statements are demonstrably false.
But of course, that would spoil your meme that Christianity is under attack and actually force you to grow up and learn to live in a pluralistic society that does not bow the knee at the Republican God you worship.
posted March 12, 2010 at 10:41 pm
“I blame the public officials who invited the participation of evangelists in a process which is meant to respect the ideas and needs of the larger public.”
This comment made me think of Roger Williams, who believed that Christians had a role to play in civic life as being just one of many voices that need to be woven together to create public policy. The key point here is “one of many”: we Christians should present our views and then try to find common ground with others — not to evangelize through government but to work for the common good of all the people in our communities.
Surely Christians can see the value in many of the civil rights movements of the past 60 years? Surely Christians can work with minority groups to ensure that the struggles of African Americans, Latinas/os, Asian Americans and Native Americans are preserved in our histories? Why is that so difficult? And are Phyllis Schlafley and the NRA really more important than Thurgood Marshall and Cesar Chavez?
posted March 12, 2010 at 11:17 pm
Let it simply be asked where is the security for property, for reputation, for life, if the sense of religious obligation desert the oaths, which are the instruments of investigation in courts of justice? And let us with caution indulge the supposition that morality can be maintained without religion.
Whatever may be conceded to the influence
of refined education on minds of peculiar
structure, reason and experience both forbid us to
expect that national morality can prevail in exclusion
of religious principle.
posted March 12, 2010 at 11:20 pm
“Surely Christians can see the value in many of the civil rights movements of the past 60 years? Surely Christians can work with minority groups to ensure that the struggles of African Americans, Latinas/os, Asian Americans and Native Americans are preserved in our histories? Why is that so difficult?”
It undermines the theme of American triumphalism that resonates through the nationalistic religion practiced by these people. Such sputtering usually marks the beginning of the decline of a nation or society. I sincerely hope that the ravings of these folks is not a similar bellwether.
“And are Phyllis Schlafley and the NRA really more important than Thurgood Marshall and Cesar Chavez?”
To these folks…yes.
posted March 13, 2010 at 11:25 am
So these Bible thumpers are doing what is right from their perspective. Fine. So is Osama bin Laden, and so were the Christians of 500 years ago who burned and tortured Jews, Moslems, and “heretics.” One of the heretics threatened with a horrible death was Galileo, who dared to report that the earth revolves around the sun, not vice-versa.
Many of the founders of this nation were devout Christians, but many were not, and they wisely prohibited the introduction of religion into law. Those who believe that religion should be taught in public schools might have liked living in Spain under Franco or living in present-day Iran or Saudi Arabia.
“Radical clerics” are enemies of genuine faith, whether they’re called sheik or reverend, whether their names are something like Raheeshnishfomunjuru or Robertson and Huckabee.
posted March 13, 2010 at 4:38 pm
hlvanburen,
Did I ever say I was a Republican? I’m actually an independent who intends to vote for the Democrat candidate in my states election for Governor. Ummm… and you shouldn’t go around judging what G-d people worship. I don’t fall in line with the Democrats or the Republicans on many issues, which is why I am an independent. Both parties are so riddled with corruption that it’s hard for a G-d fearing person to be happy with either party.
In this case I think they are taking things too far, but I also think that some school books take things too far to the left. It’s easy to criticize the side you are against without listening to them and that’s the problem with our society, everybody is talking and nobody wants to listen. That’s why we have such a huge divide in this country. Let’s take a quick look at one of the things they want to change in the textbooks:
Curriculum standards also will describe the U.S. government as a “constitutional republic,” rather than “democratic”
Ummm… our government is a constitutional republic, not a democracy. Some people would like it to be a democracy, but it’s not. That’s just one example of a completely valid change.
posted March 13, 2010 at 11:12 pm
Oh, and if you are Jewish and think the Democrats are pro-Israel, then you should take a look at what their biggest campaign funders think of Jews and Israel. For that matter, see what the Administration thinks of Israel:
http://news.yahoo.com/s/nm/us_palestinians_israel
I’m not saying Republicans are perfect (obviously not since I am voting for a Democrat for Governor), but the Democrats have some serious issues that you can’t ignore as well.
posted March 25, 2010 at 1:06 am
The so-called secularists have no problem with the teaching of Greek and Roman gods and goddesses in public school. Just as long as it is God.
posted March 25, 2010 at 3:47 am
CORRECTION
Just as long as it is God. — – > Just as long as it isn’t God.
posted July 26, 2010 at 9:33 pm
blog.beliefnet.com is great! Same day payday loans are the best option if you are in dire need of instant money before you receive your net paycheck This loan offers you a completely hassle free solution for your emergency financial crisis especially when you do not want
posted August 28, 2010 at 7:07 pm
Great concepts on this website. It’s rare these days to find websites with data you are seeking. I am happy I chanced on this webpage. I will certainly bookmark it or even register for your rss feeds simply to be updated on your new posts. Keep up the nice job and I’m sure some other folks researching valued information will actually stop by and benefit from your website for resources.
posted September 8, 2010 at 4:06 am
I will submit a link to this blog on my website. I’m sure my readers will find this info really amazing. ahvfghodircqxgmwiqvlymncbiwksknzixh
Mr. Payday Easy Loans Inc.
posted September 22, 2010 at 8:07 pm
A highly nice niche blog, and a beneficial design there sparks Simplicity yet complex algorithm of the web. Thank You. whspykaurax
posted September 25, 2010 at 8:23 pm
Hi buddy, very informative post. Please keep them coming.
posted September 26, 2010 at 6:08 am
I am doing something of the same interest and will be taking note on this .Thanks.
posted September 26, 2010 at 6:57 pm
This article gives the light in which we can observe the reality. This is very nice one and gives in-depth information. Thanks for this nice article.
posted September 27, 2010 at 7:35 pm
Thanks for such a remarkable publish and the overview, I’m completely impressed! Maintain stuff like this coming.
posted September 28, 2010 at 9:35 am
Thanks for sharing your thoughts. Take care.
posted September 28, 2010 at 8:36 pm
Usually I do not write on blogs, but I would like to say that this article really convinced me to do so! Congratulations, especially nice post.
posted September 29, 2010 at 10:23 pm
Thanks for good news! Your webpage is particularly useful for me. I bookmarked your web site!
posted September 30, 2010 at 10:33 pm
Easily, the post is really the greatest on this laudable topic. I concur with your conclusions and will thirstily look forward to your future updates. Saying thanks will not just be sufficient, for the great lucidity in your writing. I will instantly grab your rss feed to stay privy of any updates. Solid work and much success in your business enterprise!
posted October 2, 2010 at 6:54 am
Hi webmaster, commencers and everybody else !!! The blog was absolutely fantastic! Lots of awesome information and inspiration, both of which we all need! Maintain them coming… You all do such a remarkable job at such Concepts… can’t tell you how much I, for one appreciate all you do!
posted October 3, 2010 at 9:54 pm
Pretty high quality submit. I just stumbled upon your blog and wanted to say that I have really enjoyed reading your blog posts. Any way I’ll be subscribing to your feed and I hope you publish again soon.
posted October 4, 2010 at 4:55 am
Thanks for such a impressive publish as well as the review, I am completely impressed! Maintain stuff like this coming.
posted October 6, 2010 at 12:45 pm
This web-site is a complete web resource for this. You’ll find all you wanted or needed to know, here.
posted December 18, 2010 at 1:25 am
This website is the most effective online site. mqnjrfbj
posted December 18, 2010 at 8:25 pm
This website is the top web portal. pyvxwrwa
posted December 22, 2010 at 7:27 am
This website is the leading internet sites. qhvkxuyk
posted December 24, 2010 at 11:44 am
I am looking for watch football online tv review. How can I find it?
posted January 12, 2011 at 11:17 am
Excellent read about Texas Showdown about God and History
- Windows & Doors!
posted January 13, 2011 at 10:33 am
Huge blogpost all-around Texas Showdown about God and History
- Windows & Doors!
posted February 17, 2011 at 5:13 am
I like your bloge very much. Great job author of blog.beliefnet.com
posted March 13, 2011 at 5:05 pm
This design is spectacular! You definitely know how to keep a reader entertained. Between your wit and your videos, I was almost moved to start my own blog (well, almost…HaHa!) Wonderful job. I really enjoyed what you had to say, and more than that, how you presented it. Too cool!